Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Ohio by County

Prostate, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 16.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Ohio N/A No 19.3 (18.8, 19.8) N/A 1,216 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -0.2)
United States N/A No 19.0 (18.9, 19.1) N/A 32,351 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Carroll County Urban No 25.7 (16.0, 39.8) 5 (1, 77) 4 stable stable trend 24.9 (-2.1, 47.3)
Fairfield County Urban No 17.1 (13.2, 21.8) 57 (10, 77) 14 rising rising trend 24.6 (8.0, 43.4)
Portage County Urban Yes 16.7 (13.0, 21.1) 62 (12, 77) 15 stable stable trend 18.7 (-3.2, 33.7)
Montgomery County Urban No 22.3 (19.9, 24.9) 13 (5, 42) 66 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.6, 12.0)
Miami County Urban No 19.2 (14.6, 25.0) 34 (4, 75) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.3, 16.5)
Holmes County Rural No 39.6 (27.9, 54.4) 1 (1, 20) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.7)
Muskingum County Rural No 27.0 (20.5, 34.9) 4 (1, 54) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Lawrence County Urban No 28.3 (20.7, 38.0) 2 (1, 55) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.5)
Shelby County Rural No 18.0 (11.2, 27.4) 46 (3, 77) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.3)
Columbiana County Rural No 21.9 (17.0, 27.9) 14 (2, 68) 14 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
Pickaway County Urban No 20.2 (13.4, 29.2) 26 (2, 77) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.5, 0.6)
Coshocton County Rural No 21.2 (13.4, 32.0) 18 (1, 77) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.4)
Huron County Rural No 17.3 (11.2, 25.5) 55 (3, 77) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.3)
Erie County Urban Yes 15.3 (11.1, 20.9) 70 (14, 77) 9 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -0.9)
Greene County Urban No 19.5 (15.6, 24.1) 31 (6, 72) 18 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -0.8)
Lucas County Urban No 21.8 (19.0, 24.9) 15 (5, 50) 47 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.7)
Williams County Rural No 22.5 (14.3, 33.8) 11 (1, 77) 5 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.6)
Ashland County Rural No 18.6 (12.5, 26.8) 40 (3, 77) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.7)
Auglaize County Rural No 22.6 (15.1, 32.5) 10 (1, 76) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -0.2)
Cuyahoga County Urban No 23.2 (21.7, 24.9) 8 (5, 27) 165 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Lake County Urban No 19.7 (16.6, 23.3) 29 (8, 67) 29 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.2)
Ross County Rural No 17.0 (11.3, 24.6) 58 (5, 77) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.7)
Seneca County Rural No 18.1 (11.8, 26.7) 45 (3, 77) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.7)
Darke County Rural No 20.5 (14.1, 29.0) 23 (2, 76) 7 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.8)
Defiance County Rural Yes 15.3 (8.6, 25.2) 71 (4, 77) 3 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.3)
Guernsey County Rural No 20.5 (13.1, 30.9) 22 (2, 77) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.9)
Highland County Rural No 18.3 (11.6, 27.7) 43 (2, 77) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.7)
Wood County Urban No 19.7 (14.9, 25.4) 30 (4, 75) 12 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.2)
Scioto County Rural No 17.4 (12.1, 24.3) 54 (6, 77) 7 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.3)
Butler County Urban No 17.5 (14.8, 20.6) 53 (17, 73) 31 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -1.9)
Licking County Urban Yes 16.8 (13.1, 21.3) 59 (12, 76) 15 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.5)
Medina County Urban Yes 16.7 (13.3, 20.7) 61 (15, 76) 18 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.0)
Hamilton County Urban No 20.4 (18.5, 22.6) 24 (9, 51) 80 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.3, -2.2)
Hancock County Rural No 18.8 (13.2, 26.0) 38 (3, 77) 8 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.2)
Knox County Rural No 20.1 (13.9, 28.1) 28 (2, 76) 7 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.1)
Mahoning County Urban No 18.4 (15.4, 21.9) 42 (12, 72) 27 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.4, -2.1)
Richland County Urban No 19.1 (15.0, 24.0) 35 (6, 74) 15 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.6)
Stark County Urban No 19.1 (16.6, 21.8) 36 (12, 66) 43 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.4, -2.1)
Allen County Urban No 21.6 (16.4, 27.9) 16 (2, 70) 12 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.9, -1.8)
Delaware County Urban No 19.4 (15.5, 24.0) 32 (6, 72) 18 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.8, -1.4)
Belmont County Urban No 17.8 (12.5, 24.9) 49 (4, 77) 8 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.5)
Clinton County Rural No 24.2 (15.7, 35.7) 7 (1, 77) 5 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.1)
Franklin County Urban No 18.2 (16.4, 20.0) 44 (21, 63) 88 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.3, -2.5)
Summit County Urban No 20.6 (18.3, 23.1) 21 (9, 54) 63 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.3)
Athens County Rural No 20.9 (13.0, 31.5) 19 (1, 77) 5 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.7)
Fulton County Urban Yes 16.8 (10.3, 26.2) 60 (3, 77) 4 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.6)
Geauga County Urban Yes 14.8 (10.9, 19.8) 74 (16, 77) 10 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.2, -1.9)
Jefferson County Urban Yes 15.8 (10.9, 22.4) 68 (7, 77) 7 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -2.0)
Logan County Rural Yes 14.8 (8.8, 23.4) 73 (6, 77) 4 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.3, -1.4)
Marion County Rural No 17.7 (12.1, 25.1) 52 (4, 77) 7 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.8, -1.8)
Trumbull County Urban Yes 13.6 (11.0, 16.8) 76 (40, 77) 19 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.1, -2.4)
Ashtabula County Urban No 17.9 (13.4, 23.5) 48 (7, 76) 11 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.5, -2.3)
Clark County Urban Yes 16.3 (12.7, 20.8) 63 (13, 77) 14 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.4, -2.4)
Tuscarawas County Rural No 17.8 (13.2, 23.6) 50 (8, 77) 10 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.7, -2.0)
Union County Urban No 20.2 (12.9, 30.0) 27 (2, 77) 5 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.3, -1.2)
Washington County Rural Yes 16.2 (11.0, 23.1) 66 (7, 77) 7 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.7, -2.1)
Lorain County Urban Yes 16.3 (13.7, 19.3) 64 (24, 75) 29 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.5, -2.4)
Wayne County Rural No 18.9 (14.4, 24.3) 37 (5, 74) 13 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.0, -2.4)
Brown County Urban Yes 15.0 (9.0, 23.6) 72 (5, 77) 4 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.9, -1.9)
Clermont County Urban Yes 15.5 (12.2, 19.4) 69 (21, 77) 16 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.0, -2.4)
Warren County Urban Yes 16.3 (13.0, 20.1) 65 (19, 76) 18 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.0, -2.6)
Champaign County Rural No 17.8 (10.7, 27.9) 51 (2, 77) 4 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.1, -2.8)
Crawford County Rural No 18.0 (11.4, 27.2) 47 (3, 77) 5 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.0, -3.0)
Sandusky County Rural Yes 14.4 (9.2, 21.6) 75 (11, 77) 5 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.0, -3.0)
Ottawa County Urban No 25.4 (18.0, 35.5) 6 (1, 72) 8 falling falling trend -23.1 (-38.8, -9.7)
Fayette County Rural No 23.2 (13.2, 37.7) 9 (1, 77) 3
*
*
Gallia County Rural No 18.4 (10.3, 30.6) 41 (2, 77) 3
*
*
Hardin County Rural No 27.5 (16.4, 42.9) 3 (1, 77) 4
*
*
Henry County Rural No 18.6 (10.5, 31.0) 39 (2, 77) 3
*
*
Jackson County Rural No 20.2 (11.2, 33.4) 25 (1, 77) 3
*
*
Madison County Urban No 17.3 (10.3, 27.2) 56 (2, 77) 4
*
*
Meigs County Rural No 22.3 (12.6, 37.3) 12 (1, 77) 3
*
*
Mercer County Rural Yes 13.2 (7.7, 21.5) 77 (10, 77) 4
*
*
Morrow County Urban Yes 16.0 (9.1, 26.3) 67 (3, 77) 3
*
*
Perry County Urban No 19.3 (10.5, 32.1) 33 (1, 77) 3
*
*
Pike County Rural No 21.2 (12.2, 34.6) 17 (1, 77) 3
*
*
Preble County Rural No 20.8 (13.6, 30.7) 20 (2, 77) 6
*
*
Adams County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hocking County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Paulding County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Wert County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyandot County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/06/2024 12:43 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top