Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Ohio by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio *** 5.7 (5.5, 5.8) N/A 849 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.8, -2.2)
United States *** 5.1 (5.1, 5.2) N/A 20,291 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.3, -2.1)
Adams County *** 10.7 (6.3, 17.0) 1 (1, 66) 4
*
*
Fulton County *** 9.5 (6.3, 14.0) 2 (1, 61) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.3)
Guernsey County *** 9.0 (5.8, 13.7) 3 (1, 64) 5
*
*
Madison County *** 8.2 (5.1, 12.7) 4 (1, 67) 4
*
*
Carroll County *** 8.2 (4.8, 13.5) 5 (1, 67) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.5)
Seneca County *** 8.1 (5.4, 11.9) 6 (1, 65) 6
*
*
Darke County *** 8.0 (5.4, 11.7) 7 (1, 63) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Lawrence County *** 8.0 (5.5, 11.5) 8 (1, 65) 6 stable stable trend -25.4 (-50.0, 11.3)
Holmes County *** 7.8 (4.6, 12.3) 9 (1, 67) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.8)
Highland County *** 7.6 (4.7, 11.7) 10 (1, 67) 4
*
*
Scioto County *** 7.2 (5.1, 10.1) 11 (1, 65) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Clinton County *** 7.2 (4.4, 11.3) 12 (1, 67) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
Ashland County *** 7.2 (4.8, 10.6) 13 (1, 67) 6
*
*
Brown County *** 7.1 (4.4, 11.2) 14 (1, 67) 4
*
*
Knox County *** 7.0 (4.7, 10.3) 15 (1, 67) 6
*
*
Logan County *** 7.0 (4.3, 11.0) 16 (1, 67) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.4)
Williams County *** 7.0 (4.1, 11.4) 17 (1, 67) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.2)
Miami County *** 6.9 (5.2, 9.2) 18 (2, 64) 10 stable stable trend 6.3 (-2.5, 15.8)
Portage County *** 6.9 (5.3, 8.8) 19 (3, 62) 14 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Hancock County *** 6.9 (4.7, 9.7) 20 (2, 66) 7 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Geauga County *** 6.9 (5.0, 9.4) 21 (2, 64) 9 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.2)
Wayne County *** 6.9 (5.1, 9.1) 22 (2, 64) 10 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.3)
Columbiana County *** 6.8 (5.1, 9.0) 23 (2, 64) 11 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.0, -1.7)
Coshocton County *** 6.8 (4.0, 11.1) 24 (1, 67) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.6)
Defiance County *** 6.8 (4.0, 11.0) 25 (1, 67) 4
*
*
Union County *** 6.6 (3.9, 10.6) 26 (1, 67) 4
*
*
Sandusky County *** 6.6 (4.3, 9.9) 27 (1, 67) 6 falling falling trend -6.9 (-12.0, -1.6)
Mercer County *** 6.6 (3.8, 10.7) 28 (1, 67) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.3)
Belmont County *** 6.5 (4.4, 9.3) 29 (2, 67) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Shelby County *** 6.4 (4.0, 10.0) 30 (1, 67) 4
*
*
Jefferson County *** 6.3 (4.3, 9.1) 31 (2, 67) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.1)
Ottawa County *** 6.3 (4.0, 9.9) 32 (1, 67) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Lorain County *** 6.2 (5.2, 7.4) 33 (10, 59) 26 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Allen County *** 6.1 (4.3, 8.4) 34 (4, 67) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.2)
Fairfield County *** 6.0 (4.5, 7.9) 35 (6, 66) 11 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.5)
Tuscarawas County *** 6.0 (4.2, 8.3) 36 (4, 67) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Butler County *** 6.0 (5.0, 7.1) 37 (12, 63) 26 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Summit County *** 5.9 (5.2, 6.8) 38 (16, 59) 42 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Lucas County *** 5.9 (5.0, 7.0) 39 (13, 61) 32 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Ashtabula County *** 5.9 (4.1, 8.3) 40 (5, 67) 7 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.2)
Warren County *** 5.9 (4.6, 7.4) 41 (9, 65) 15 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.1)
Crawford County *** 5.9 (3.5, 9.5) 42 (2, 67) 4
*
*
Pickaway County *** 5.8 (3.6, 9.1) 43 (2, 67) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.5)
Medina County *** 5.8 (4.5, 7.4) 44 (9, 66) 14 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Richland County *** 5.8 (4.3, 7.7) 45 (7, 67) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Cuyahoga County *** 5.7 (5.1, 6.2) 46 (23, 57) 97 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -2.0)
Muskingum County *** 5.6 (3.8, 8.1) 47 (5, 67) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.3, 0.1)
Marion County *** 5.6 (3.6, 8.4) 48 (4, 67) 5 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.1, -1.4)
Greene County *** 5.6 (4.2, 7.2) 49 (9, 67) 12 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.8, -1.8)
Montgomery County *** 5.5 (4.8, 6.4) 50 (20, 63) 41 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Wood County *** 5.4 (3.8, 7.5) 51 (9, 67) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.2)
Huron County *** 5.3 (3.2, 8.3) 52 (4, 67) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.9, 0.0)
Washington County *** 5.2 (3.3, 8.0) 53 (5, 67) 5 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.1)
Clark County *** 5.2 (3.8, 7.0) 54 (12, 67) 9 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.6)
Erie County *** 5.2 (3.5, 7.6) 55 (8, 67) 6 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Auglaize County *** 5.2 (2.9, 8.7) 56 (4, 67) 3
*
*
Lake County *** 5.1 (4.1, 6.4) 57 (21, 67) 18 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -2.0)
Ross County *** 5.1 (3.2, 7.7) 58 (7, 67) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Athens County *** 5.1 (3.0, 8.3) 59 (5, 67) 4
*
*
Licking County *** 5.0 (3.8, 6.6) 60 (14, 67) 11 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.5)
Franklin County *** 5.0 (4.4, 5.6) 61 (34, 65) 60 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.5)
Stark County *** 5.0 (4.2, 5.9) 62 (28, 67) 28 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.5)
Mahoning County *** 4.9 (3.9, 6.1) 63 (22, 67) 18 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.6)
Hamilton County *** 4.7 (4.0, 5.3) 64 (40, 67) 44 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -2.0)
Trumbull County *** 4.6 (3.5, 5.8) 65 (29, 67) 14 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.6, -2.1)
Clermont County *** 4.5 (3.4, 5.9) 66 (26, 67) 12 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -1.0)
Delaware County *** 3.8 (2.7, 5.3) 67 (36, 67) 7
*
*
Champaign County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallia County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hocking County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrow County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Paulding County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Preble County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Wert County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyandot County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 4:08 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top