Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Ohio by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Ohio *** 6.0 (5.9, 6.2) N/A 879 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.9, -2.2)
United States *** 5.4 (5.3, 5.4) N/A 20,311 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.3, -2.1)
Lawrence County *** 10.6 (7.6, 14.5) 2 (1, 40) 8 stable stable trend 14.2 (-0.2, 30.6)
Pickaway County *** 7.6 (4.9, 11.3) 14 (1, 66) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.1)
Coshocton County *** 7.9 (4.7, 12.5) 11 (1, 66) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.3)
Darke County *** 8.1 (5.4, 11.8) 9 (1, 64) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Jefferson County *** 7.3 (5.0, 10.3) 20 (2, 65) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.7)
Williams County *** 7.3 (4.3, 11.8) 17 (1, 66) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 2.0)
Clinton County *** 8.4 (5.2, 12.8) 5 (1, 65) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.8)
Carroll County *** 10.5 (6.5, 16.4) 3 (1, 62) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.8)
Mercer County *** 7.3 (4.2, 11.8) 18 (1, 66) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.4, 2.0)
Ross County *** 5.8 (3.7, 8.5) 47 (5, 66) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Tuscarawas County *** 6.7 (4.8, 9.2) 26 (4, 65) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.2)
Holmes County *** 9.3 (5.8, 14.2) 4 (1, 65) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.4)
Muskingum County *** 6.5 (4.5, 9.2) 31 (4, 66) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Scioto County *** 5.0 (3.3, 7.5) 60 (9, 66) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.9)
Erie County *** 5.9 (4.1, 8.4) 45 (6, 66) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Logan County *** 6.7 (4.0, 10.6) 27 (2, 66) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 1.1)
Hancock County *** 8.1 (5.7, 11.2) 8 (1, 62) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Belmont County *** 7.3 (5.1, 10.2) 19 (2, 65) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Ottawa County *** 4.8 (2.8, 8.2) 63 (7, 66) 3 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Portage County *** 7.2 (5.6, 9.2) 21 (3, 60) 14 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Lorain County *** 6.0 (5.0, 7.3) 41 (12, 62) 24 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.7)
Medina County *** 7.1 (5.6, 9.0) 22 (4, 58) 15 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Montgomery County *** 5.8 (5.1, 6.7) 46 (20, 61) 41 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Butler County *** 5.6 (4.6, 6.7) 50 (18, 65) 23 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Clermont County *** 5.6 (4.3, 7.1) 49 (13, 66) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Lucas County *** 6.5 (5.5, 7.5) 33 (11, 57) 35 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Richland County *** 6.2 (4.6, 8.2) 37 (7, 65) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Wayne County *** 7.0 (5.1, 9.3) 23 (3, 64) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
Defiance County *** 8.2 (5.0, 12.8) 6 (1, 66) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.8, 0.1)
Summit County *** 6.4 (5.6, 7.3) 35 (13, 56) 44 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Warren County *** 6.6 (5.2, 8.3) 28 (6, 62) 16 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Franklin County *** 5.7 (5.1, 6.4) 48 (24, 60) 66 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Stark County *** 6.2 (5.3, 7.3) 36 (13, 59) 33 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Wood County *** 4.4 (3.0, 6.3) 65 (21, 66) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.2)
Ashtabula County *** 6.9 (4.9, 9.5) 24 (3, 65) 9 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Fulton County *** 8.0 (5.0, 12.3) 10 (1, 66) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.3, 0.0)
Mahoning County *** 5.4 (4.4, 6.6) 55 (19, 66) 20 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.4)
Huron County *** 5.5 (3.4, 8.7) 52 (4, 66) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.6, 0.1)
Allen County *** 6.9 (5.0, 9.4) 25 (3, 65) 9 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.0)
Hamilton County *** 5.1 (4.5, 5.9) 59 (32, 64) 48 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.8)
Geauga County *** 6.5 (4.6, 9.0) 32 (4, 66) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.1)
Clark County *** 5.4 (4.0, 7.2) 54 (13, 66) 10 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.4)
Cuyahoga County *** 6.1 (5.6, 6.7) 39 (21, 54) 105 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -1.9)
Fairfield County *** 5.3 (3.9, 7.2) 57 (13, 66) 9 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.5)
Lake County *** 5.5 (4.4, 6.8) 53 (17, 65) 19 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -1.7)
Licking County *** 5.9 (4.5, 7.6) 44 (10, 65) 13 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.5)
Trumbull County *** 5.0 (3.9, 6.3) 61 (22, 66) 16 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.6, -1.9)
Marion County *** 5.9 (3.9, 8.9) 43 (4, 66) 5 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.9, -0.8)
Greene County *** 5.5 (4.2, 7.2) 51 (12, 66) 12 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.1, -2.0)
Washington County *** 4.2 (2.5, 6.8) 66 (16, 66) 4 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.2, -1.2)
Columbiana County *** 5.2 (3.6, 7.2) 58 (13, 66) 8 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.1, -2.7)
Miami County *** 6.1 (4.4, 8.3) 38 (6, 66) 9 falling falling trend -6.0 (-10.1, -1.8)
Sandusky County *** 7.5 (5.1, 10.8) 15 (1, 65) 6 stable stable trend -6.2 (-13.6, 1.8)
Adams County *** 12.3 (7.6, 19.1) 1 (1, 58) 4
*
*
Ashland County *** 6.0 (3.8, 9.3) 42 (3, 66) 5
*
*
Athens County *** 4.9 (2.8, 8.1) 62 (6, 66) 3
*
*
Brown County *** 6.4 (3.8, 10.2) 34 (2, 66) 4
*
*
Champaign County *** 7.7 (4.6, 12.3) 13 (1, 66) 4
*
*
Crawford County *** 6.5 (4.0, 10.3) 30 (2, 66) 4
*
*
Delaware County *** 4.5 (3.2, 6.1) 64 (22, 66) 8
*
*
Guernsey County *** 8.1 (5.0, 12.6) 7 (1, 66) 4
*
*
Highland County *** 6.6 (4.0, 10.5) 29 (1, 66) 4
*
*
Knox County *** 6.1 (3.9, 9.2) 40 (3, 66) 5
*
*
Seneca County *** 7.8 (5.1, 11.5) 12 (1, 65) 6
*
*
Shelby County *** 5.3 (3.0, 8.8) 56 (4, 66) 3
*
*
Union County *** 7.4 (4.3, 11.7) 16 (1, 66) 4
*
*
Auglaize County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallia County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hocking County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrow County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Paulding County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Preble County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Wert County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyandot County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/24/2020 7:27 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top