Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Ohio by County

Leukemia, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio *** 6.6 (6.4, 6.7) N/A 970 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
United States *** 6.0 (6.0, 6.1) N/A 23,447 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Adams County *** 10.8 (6.3, 17.5) 1 (1, 69) 4
*
*
Allen County *** 6.8 (5.0, 9.1) 40 (4, 68) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Ashland County *** 6.7 (4.3, 10.1) 44 (3, 69) 5 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.1)
Ashtabula County *** 7.8 (5.8, 10.3) 17 (2, 66) 11 stable stable trend -12.0 (-30.8, 12.0)
Auglaize County *** 7.3 (4.6, 11.3) 24 (1, 69) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Belmont County *** 7.8 (5.5, 10.9) 15 (1, 68) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Brown County *** 8.6 (5.6, 12.8) 9 (1, 68) 5
*
*
Butler County *** 6.5 (5.5, 7.8) 47 (13, 65) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Champaign County *** 7.2 (4.4, 11.5) 27 (1, 69) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.4)
Clark County *** 8.4 (6.6, 10.5) 11 (2, 55) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Clermont County *** 6.2 (4.8, 7.8) 54 (12, 69) 15 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Clinton County *** 6.1 (3.5, 10.1) 55 (2, 69) 3
*
*
Columbiana County *** 6.6 (4.9, 8.9) 45 (6, 69) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Coshocton County *** 7.0 (4.1, 11.5) 35 (1, 69) 4
*
*
Crawford County *** 5.9 (3.5, 9.7) 58 (4, 69) 4
*
*
Cuyahoga County *** 6.7 (6.2, 7.3) 41 (19, 55) 114 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Darke County *** 6.4 (4.0, 9.9) 49 (2, 69) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Defiance County *** 8.1 (5.0, 12.6) 13 (1, 69) 4
*
*
Delaware County *** 4.6 (3.3, 6.2) 69 (36, 69) 9 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.4)
Erie County *** 6.9 (4.8, 9.6) 38 (3, 69) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.5)
Fairfield County *** 7.1 (5.4, 9.1) 34 (5, 67) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Fayette County *** 10.3 (5.9, 16.7) 3 (1, 69) 3
*
*
Franklin County *** 6.0 (5.4, 6.7) 57 (29, 65) 73 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Fulton County *** 8.9 (5.6, 13.5) 8 (1, 69) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Gallia County *** 10.6 (6.6, 16.4) 2 (1, 65) 4
*
*
Geauga County *** 6.2 (4.3, 8.7) 53 (6, 69) 7 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Greene County *** 5.8 (4.4, 7.5) 63 (14, 69) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.1)
Guernsey County *** 7.2 (4.4, 11.3) 30 (1, 69) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.7)
Hamilton County *** 6.6 (5.9, 7.4) 46 (19, 60) 63 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Hancock County *** 7.8 (5.4, 10.8) 16 (1, 68) 7
*
*
Hardin County *** 8.2 (4.6, 13.7) 12 (1, 69) 3
*
*
Highland County *** 5.3 (3.1, 8.8) 65 (6, 69) 3
*
*
Huron County *** 7.2 (4.7, 10.7) 28 (1, 69) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.2)
Jefferson County *** 7.5 (5.1, 10.9) 20 (1, 69) 7 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Knox County *** 6.9 (4.5, 10.2) 37 (2, 69) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.2)
Lake County *** 7.1 (5.9, 8.5) 33 (7, 63) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Lawrence County *** 7.4 (4.9, 10.8) 21 (1, 69) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Licking County *** 6.3 (4.9, 8.1) 50 (10, 69) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Logan County *** 5.8 (3.5, 9.4) 62 (4, 69) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.6)
Lorain County *** 6.2 (5.1, 7.4) 52 (16, 67) 25 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Lucas County *** 7.2 (6.2, 8.3) 29 (9, 57) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Mahoning County *** 5.2 (4.2, 6.5) 66 (31, 69) 19 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Marion County *** 7.4 (5.1, 10.5) 23 (2, 69) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Medina County *** 5.9 (4.5, 7.5) 60 (14, 69) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Mercer County *** 6.5 (3.8, 10.6) 48 (2, 69) 4
*
*
Miami County *** 6.3 (4.6, 8.5) 51 (8, 69) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Montgomery County *** 5.8 (5.0, 6.6) 64 (30, 67) 40 falling falling trend -7.9 (-14.1, -1.2)
Muskingum County *** 8.0 (5.8, 10.8) 14 (1, 67) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Ottawa County *** 5.9 (3.5, 9.8) 59 (2, 69) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.8)
Perry County *** 9.0 (5.5, 14.1) 6 (1, 69) 4
*
*
Pickaway County *** 7.3 (4.7, 10.9) 25 (1, 69) 5
*
*
Portage County *** 5.2 (3.9, 6.9) 67 (21, 69) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Preble County *** 9.6 (6.2, 14.2) 4 (1, 67) 5
*
*
Putnam County *** 7.7 (4.6, 12.4) 18 (1, 69) 4
*
*
Richland County *** 6.1 (4.5, 8.1) 56 (10, 69) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Ross County *** 8.4 (6.0, 11.6) 10 (1, 66) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.8)
Sandusky County *** 7.1 (4.6, 10.6) 32 (2, 69) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.3)
Scioto County *** 7.4 (5.1, 10.4) 22 (2, 69) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Seneca County *** 7.5 (4.9, 11.2) 19 (1, 69) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Stark County *** 7.2 (6.1, 8.3) 31 (9, 58) 38 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Summit County *** 6.7 (5.9, 7.6) 43 (16, 60) 49 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Trumbull County *** 6.8 (5.5, 8.4) 39 (8, 65) 21 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Tuscarawas County *** 5.1 (3.5, 7.3) 68 (17, 69) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Van Wert County *** 9.5 (5.8, 15.1) 5 (1, 69) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6)
Warren County *** 5.8 (4.5, 7.4) 61 (15, 69) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Washington County *** 7.0 (4.6, 10.3) 36 (2, 69) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Wayne County *** 6.7 (4.9, 9.0) 42 (5, 69) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Williams County *** 7.3 (4.2, 11.9) 26 (1, 69) 4
*
*
Wood County *** 8.9 (6.9, 11.4) 7 (1, 55) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Athens County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hocking County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrow County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Paulding County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyandot County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/28/2022 3:42 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top