Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma No 175.2 (173.5, 176.9) N/A 8,284 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.8)
United States No 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) N/A 599,666 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Okfuskee County No 247.6 (213.9, 285.5) 1 (1, 28) 40 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Love County No 225.6 (190.7, 265.4) 2 (1, 59) 31 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Garvin County No 220.6 (199.0, 244.0) 3 (1, 36) 80 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.8)
Kiowa County No 216.9 (180.8, 258.8) 4 (1, 66) 27 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Ottawa County No 213.5 (193.9, 234.8) 5 (1, 41) 90 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Caddo County No 212.9 (192.1, 235.5) 6 (1, 44) 79 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.7)
Nowata County No 209.1 (177.1, 246.0) 7 (1, 67) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Sequoyah County No 209.0 (192.1, 227.2) 8 (1, 41) 117 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Murray County No 206.2 (178.1, 238.0) 9 (1, 64) 41 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Harmon County No 203.2 (140.3, 286.8) 10 (1, 77) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.1)
Muskogee County No 202.4 (189.0, 216.6) 11 (3, 43) 176 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.2)
Hughes County No 202.1 (174.0, 233.9) 12 (1, 69) 38 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Grant County No 201.5 (153.3, 261.7) 13 (1, 76) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.5)
Greer County No 201.3 (158.7, 252.8) 14 (1, 75) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
McCurtain County No 200.8 (181.9, 221.3) 15 (2, 53) 87 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Le Flore County No 200.5 (185.2, 216.8) 16 (3, 49) 132 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Seminole County No 199.5 (178.1, 223.0) 17 (2, 60) 66 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Cotton County No 199.0 (157.6, 249.2) 18 (1, 75) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Okmulgee County No 197.3 (180.3, 215.6) 19 (3, 56) 104 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0)
Creek County No 196.4 (183.8, 209.7) 20 (5, 48) 189 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.6, -0.1)
Carter County No 194.8 (179.4, 211.3) 21 (4, 55) 122 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Pottawatomie County No 193.8 (180.9, 207.4) 22 (7, 53) 174 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
Pittsburg County No 193.4 (178.0, 209.8) 23 (5, 59) 123 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Beckham County No 192.8 (168.9, 219.3) 24 (2, 69) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Haskell County No 192.7 (165.1, 224.3) 25 (1, 72) 37 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Texas County No 190.9 (163.2, 221.9) 26 (2, 72) 35 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.2, 6.3)
Atoka County No 190.0 (163.2, 220.4) 27 (2, 72) 37 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2)
Choctaw County No 189.8 (164.8, 218.1) 28 (2, 71) 43 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Mayes County No 188.8 (172.5, 206.3) 29 (5, 62) 104 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Cherokee County No 187.4 (171.8, 204.0) 30 (7, 63) 112 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.2)
McIntosh County No 187.3 (166.8, 210.2) 31 (4, 69) 66 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Pushmataha County No 187.1 (159.7, 218.7) 32 (2, 74) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Washington County No 187.1 (173.1, 202.0) 33 (9, 62) 142 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Kay County No 186.9 (171.6, 203.3) 34 (8, 66) 117 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Jefferson County No 186.2 (146.6, 234.2) 35 (1, 76) 17 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Johnston County No 185.4 (155.7, 219.7) 36 (2, 74) 29 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Blaine County No 185.4 (153.4, 222.7) 37 (1, 75) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
McClain County No 183.6 (166.2, 202.3) 38 (7, 69) 85 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Tillman County No 182.8 (147.4, 225.1) 39 (1, 76) 19 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.2, 5.9)
Lincoln County No 182.7 (165.6, 201.1) 40 (9, 69) 88 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Pawnee County No 182.6 (158.3, 210.0) 41 (4, 74) 42 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Stephens County No 182.1 (167.0, 198.2) 42 (11, 67) 115 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Adair County No 179.8 (157.5, 204.5) 43 (6, 73) 48 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Comanche County No 179.3 (168.6, 190.4) 44 (21, 64) 217 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Custer County No 178.9 (157.9, 201.9) 45 (8, 73) 55 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Latimer County No 178.6 (150.2, 211.7) 46 (3, 76) 30 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Jackson County No 178.5 (157.0, 202.2) 47 (7, 73) 51 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Coal County No 177.4 (139.6, 223.9) 48 (1, 77) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Craig County No 177.1 (152.0, 205.6) 49 (4, 75) 37 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Marshall County No 175.7 (152.9, 201.4) 50 (6, 74) 46 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Noble County No 175.0 (147.3, 207.1) 51 (4, 76) 29 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Roger Mills County No 174.0 (128.6, 233.1) 52 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Rogers County No 173.6 (162.9, 184.9) 53 (26, 68) 201 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Major County No 173.1 (138.5, 214.5) 54 (2, 77) 19 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.1)
Pontotoc County No 172.7 (156.2, 190.6) 55 (17, 73) 83 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Oklahoma County No 172.4 (168.4, 176.5) 56 (40, 62) 1,455 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.8)
Grady County No 171.7 (158.0, 186.5) 57 (23, 71) 119 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Washita County No 171.6 (142.3, 205.6) 58 (4, 77) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.7)
Ellis County No 171.5 (126.2, 230.0) 59 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Garfield County No 168.9 (155.9, 182.8) 60 (27, 73) 129 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Delaware County No 166.8 (153.0, 181.6) 61 (28, 73) 121 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Tulsa County No 165.8 (161.5, 170.1) 62 (47, 68) 1,205 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
Payne County No 165.1 (152.3, 178.8) 63 (33, 73) 127 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Dewey County No 164.1 (124.0, 214.6) 64 (2, 77) 12 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Bryan County No 163.4 (149.2, 178.8) 65 (34, 74) 100 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Woods County No 162.0 (130.3, 199.8) 66 (5, 77) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Canadian County No 160.8 (151.6, 170.4) 67 (46, 73) 238 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Kingfisher County No 159.2 (134.8, 187.0) 68 (13, 77) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Osage County No 159.0 (145.5, 173.6) 69 (39, 76) 109 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Logan County No 154.2 (139.9, 169.6) 70 (41, 76) 90 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Harper County No 153.3 (108.3, 212.7) 71 (2, 77) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Woodward County No 151.0 (129.9, 174.8) 72 (31, 77) 37 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Cleveland County No 150.1 (143.8, 156.6) 73 (62, 75) 441 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.5)
Alfalfa County No 148.3 (114.6, 190.6) 74 (10, 77) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Wagoner County No 139.1 (128.7, 150.1) 75 (66, 77) 138 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Beaver County Yes 122.0 (88.8, 165.1) 76 (40, 77) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Cimarron County Yes 117.7 (70.3, 190.7) 77 (7, 77) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2022 5:50 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top