Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma *** 178.0 (176.3, 179.8) N/A 8,266 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.8)
United States *** 152.4 (152.3, 152.6) N/A 598,381 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Woodward County *** 137.9 (117.8, 160.6) 76 (51, 77) 34 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Woods County *** 159.5 (127.9, 197.1) 70 (7, 77) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Washita County *** 162.1 (133.8, 195.2) 66 (10, 77) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Washington County *** 182.2 (168.4, 197.0) 46 (14, 66) 137 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Wagoner County *** 143.0 (132.2, 154.5) 75 (64, 77) 137 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Tulsa County *** 168.2 (163.9, 172.6) 60 (48, 68) 1,196 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Tillman County *** 195.0 (158.0, 238.9) 27 (1, 75) 20 stable stable trend 2.5 (-2.1, 7.4)
Texas County *** 192.4 (164.5, 223.5) 32 (2, 72) 35 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.7, 6.8)
Stephens County *** 181.6 (166.6, 197.8) 49 (11, 68) 114 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Sequoyah County *** 198.6 (182.0, 216.4) 23 (3, 57) 110 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Seminole County *** 206.4 (184.5, 230.4) 8 (1, 56) 67 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Rogers County *** 171.0 (160.1, 182.4) 58 (33, 70) 192 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Roger Mills County *** 165.3 (121.0, 223.3) 62 (2, 77) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Pushmataha County *** 199.3 (171.3, 231.4) 21 (1, 70) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Pottawatomie County *** 193.4 (180.4, 207.1) 30 (8, 57) 169 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Pontotoc County *** 182.8 (165.8, 201.1) 44 (10, 68) 87 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Pittsburg County *** 201.7 (185.9, 218.6) 15 (3, 52) 126 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Payne County *** 163.1 (150.2, 176.8) 65 (38, 74) 123 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Pawnee County *** 190.0 (165.1, 218.0) 34 (2, 71) 44 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Ottawa County *** 218.6 (198.6, 240.2) 3 (1, 39) 92 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Osage County *** 164.0 (150.1, 179.0) 64 (34, 74) 110 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Okmulgee County *** 199.6 (182.6, 218.0) 19 (3, 56) 106 stable stable trend -7.3 (-14.1, 0.1)
Oklahoma County *** 176.7 (172.6, 180.9) 54 (37, 60) 1,465 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.9, -0.7)
Okfuskee County *** 245.5 (211.8, 283.5) 1 (1, 31) 39 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.0)
Nowata County *** 218.6 (186.0, 255.9) 4 (1, 61) 33 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Noble County *** 173.9 (146.0, 206.2) 55 (5, 76) 28 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Muskogee County *** 204.1 (190.6, 218.4) 10 (3, 43) 176 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Murray County *** 205.6 (177.4, 237.4) 9 (1, 66) 40 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
McIntosh County *** 181.3 (161.3, 203.6) 50 (8, 72) 64 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
McCurtain County *** 202.8 (183.8, 223.5) 13 (2, 56) 87 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
McClain County *** 182.0 (164.6, 200.9) 47 (10, 70) 82 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Mayes County *** 200.6 (183.8, 218.7) 17 (2, 53) 110 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Marshall County *** 178.9 (155.7, 205.0) 51 (6, 74) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Major County *** 186.5 (150.8, 229.0) 38 (1, 76) 21 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.1, 2.3)
Love County *** 208.7 (175.5, 246.9) 7 (1, 68) 29 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.8)
Logan County *** 160.0 (145.1, 176.0) 68 (38, 76) 89 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Lincoln County *** 186.4 (168.9, 205.4) 39 (7, 69) 87 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Le Flore County *** 202.4 (187.0, 218.8) 14 (2, 49) 133 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Latimer County *** 182.6 (153.5, 216.3) 45 (3, 75) 30 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Kiowa County *** 230.6 (193.1, 273.8) 2 (1, 60) 29 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Kingfisher County *** 153.2 (129.2, 180.5) 72 (25, 77) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Kay County *** 195.7 (180.1, 212.5) 26 (5, 58) 122 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Johnston County *** 178.0 (149.0, 211.5) 52 (3, 75) 28 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Jefferson County *** 199.0 (158.9, 247.3) 22 (1, 75) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Jackson County *** 184.0 (162.2, 208.0) 43 (4, 73) 53 stable stable trend -8.0 (-16.8, 1.7)
Hughes County *** 217.3 (187.8, 250.5) 6 (1, 58) 40 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Haskell County *** 203.9 (174.8, 236.9) 11 (1, 69) 37 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Harper County *** 143.4 (100.0, 201.2) 74 (4, 77) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Harmon County *** 200.0 (138.2, 282.1) 18 (1, 77) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.4)
Greer County *** 201.1 (159.0, 251.9) 16 (1, 75) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Grant County *** 187.2 (139.3, 247.5) 37 (1, 77) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Grady County *** 181.8 (167.5, 197.2) 48 (13, 67) 123 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Garvin County *** 218.3 (197.0, 241.5) 5 (1, 43) 79 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.8)
Garfield County *** 172.6 (159.4, 186.6) 57 (26, 72) 132 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.8, -0.1)
Ellis County *** 172.6 (127.5, 230.6) 56 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Dewey County *** 161.1 (122.2, 210.1) 67 (2, 77) 12 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Delaware County *** 170.7 (156.7, 185.7) 59 (26, 73) 122 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Custer County *** 192.8 (171.2, 216.6) 31 (3, 66) 59 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Creek County *** 199.5 (186.7, 212.9) 20 (5, 48) 189 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.6, -0.1)
Craig County *** 184.9 (159.2, 214.1) 41 (3, 73) 39 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Cotton County *** 198.5 (156.3, 249.6) 24 (1, 75) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Comanche County *** 177.8 (167.1, 189.0) 53 (24, 66) 212 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Coal County *** 185.8 (146.4, 234.1) 40 (1, 76) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Cleveland County *** 156.9 (150.3, 163.7) 71 (57, 74) 444 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.4)
Cimarron County *** 164.5 (107.0, 246.9) 63 (1, 77) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.8)
Choctaw County *** 197.3 (171.5, 226.5) 25 (2, 69) 44 stable stable trend -9.9 (-20.1, 1.7)
Cherokee County *** 184.3 (168.7, 201.1) 42 (10, 67) 107 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Carter County *** 194.6 (179.1, 211.1) 28 (5, 58) 120 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Canadian County *** 160.0 (150.6, 169.7) 69 (49, 74) 227 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Caddo County *** 203.1 (182.7, 225.2) 12 (2, 57) 75 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Bryan County *** 166.9 (152.5, 182.4) 61 (31, 74) 102 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Blaine County *** 188.6 (156.7, 225.7) 35 (1, 75) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Beckham County *** 194.5 (170.4, 221.1) 29 (2, 68) 48 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Beaver County *** 116.2 (83.7, 158.6) 77 (51, 77) 9 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Atoka County *** 188.4 (161.8, 218.6) 36 (2, 72) 37 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Alfalfa County *** 143.8 (110.5, 185.7) 73 (14, 77) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Adair County *** 192.4 (169.0, 218.2) 33 (3, 70) 51 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/05/2022 8:58 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.



Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top