Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma N/A Yes 58.5 (57.4, 59.6) N/A 2,406 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.1, -1.0)
United States N/A Yes 45.0 (44.9, 45.1) N/A 161,722 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.9)
Woodward County Rural Yes 39.0 (27.7, 53.7) 70 (40, 70) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.5, -1.5)
Woods County Rural Yes 48.6 (29.1, 77.1) 67 (6, 70) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.7, 1.1)
Washita County Rural Yes 56.2 (37.6, 81.3) 53 (4, 70) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.8)
Washington County Rural Yes 65.6 (55.9, 76.7) 31 (8, 61) 36 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Wagoner County Urban Yes 50.0 (43.4, 57.3) 64 (39, 70) 45 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Tulsa County Urban Yes 52.6 (50.2, 55.2) 61 (46, 65) 357 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Tillman County Rural Yes 71.1 (46.9, 105.1) 18 (1, 70) 6 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.3)
Texas County Rural Yes 54.3 (40.7, 70.9) 60 (11, 70) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Stephens County Rural Yes 63.6 (53.1, 75.7) 39 (8, 64) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1)
Sequoyah County Urban Yes 79.3 (67.4, 92.7) 12 (2, 41) 35 stable stable trend -0.1 (-9.0, 7.5)
Seminole County Rural Yes 76.6 (61.8, 94.0) 14 (2, 56) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Rogers County Urban Yes 42.9 (37.4, 49.1) 69 (56, 70) 47 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.1)
Pushmataha County Rural Yes 67.3 (47.7, 93.3) 26 (2, 69) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Pottawatomie County Rural Yes 66.9 (58.8, 75.8) 28 (10, 57) 54 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Pontotoc County Rural Yes 61.0 (49.9, 73.8) 42 (10, 68) 23 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Pittsburg County Rural Yes 71.6 (60.9, 83.8) 17 (4, 55) 35 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Payne County Rural Yes 64.1 (55.1, 74.1) 38 (10, 61) 39 stable stable trend 0.6 (-8.6, 7.5)
Pawnee County Urban Yes 60.2 (44.7, 79.9) 45 (5, 70) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Ottawa County Rural Yes 81.0 (67.0, 97.1) 8 (1, 44) 26 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Osage County Urban Yes 58.2 (48.7, 69.1) 48 (14, 68) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Okmulgee County Urban Yes 65.7 (54.4, 78.8) 30 (7, 64) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Oklahoma County Urban Yes 56.1 (53.7, 58.5) 54 (39, 60) 442 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Okfuskee County Rural Yes 103.5 (79.1, 133.6) 2 (1, 32) 13 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.5, 8.3)
Nowata County Rural Yes 65.1 (44.7, 92.7) 34 (2, 70) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Noble County Rural Yes 57.5 (40.0, 80.9) 49 (4, 70) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Muskogee County Rural Yes 67.7 (59.2, 77.2) 24 (7, 55) 49 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Murray County Rural Yes 56.0 (39.8, 77.3) 55 (6, 70) 9 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
McIntosh County Rural Yes 67.5 (52.2, 86.4) 25 (3, 68) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
McCurtain County Rural Yes 88.4 (73.8, 105.2) 5 (1, 34) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
McClain County Urban Yes 55.6 (46.2, 66.6) 56 (18, 69) 26 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.1)
Mayes County Rural Yes 68.5 (57.6, 81.1) 22 (5, 59) 30 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Marshall County Rural Yes 66.4 (49.9, 87.3) 29 (3, 68) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.3)
Major County Rural Yes 56.9 (34.2, 89.5) 51 (2, 70) 4
*
*
Love County Rural Yes 83.3 (59.6, 113.7) 7 (1, 66) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.6)
Logan County Urban Yes 49.8 (41.7, 59.2) 65 (32, 70) 29 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.2)
Lincoln County Urban Yes 58.9 (48.5, 71.1) 46 (11, 68) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Le Flore County Rural Yes 65.0 (55.3, 76.2) 35 (8, 62) 34 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Latimer County Rural Yes 49.2 (31.9, 73.7) 66 (9, 70) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.0)
Kiowa County Rural Yes 79.6 (54.1, 113.6) 11 (1, 68) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.7)
Kingfisher County Rural Yes 55.2 (39.2, 75.9) 58 (7, 70) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Kay County Rural Yes 65.4 (55.0, 77.4) 32 (8, 63) 31 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Johnston County Rural Yes 69.3 (47.6, 98.0) 20 (1, 70) 7 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Jefferson County Rural Yes 74.3 (44.5, 117.8) 15 (1, 70) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.4)
Jackson County Rural Yes 65.0 (51.1, 81.6) 36 (5, 68) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Hughes County Rural Yes 67.1 (49.2, 90.0) 27 (2, 69) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Haskell County Rural Yes 72.2 (52.0, 98.3) 16 (1, 69) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Greer County Rural Yes 85.6 (55.4, 128.0) 6 (1, 69) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.3)
Grant County Rural Yes 108.8 (66.4, 169.6) 1 (1, 67) 5 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.3, 3.7)
Grady County Urban Yes 55.4 (47.2, 64.7) 57 (23, 68) 35 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Garvin County Rural Yes 80.0 (64.8, 97.8) 9 (1, 52) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Garfield County Urban Yes 60.7 (52.0, 70.5) 43 (14, 65) 38 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Delaware County Rural Yes 60.5 (50.3, 72.5) 44 (11, 67) 29 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Custer County Rural Yes 56.8 (44.0, 72.1) 52 (9, 70) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Creek County Urban Yes 68.6 (60.5, 77.6) 21 (8, 51) 57 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Craig County Rural Yes 54.6 (39.2, 74.7) 59 (7, 70) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Cotton County Urban Yes 52.1 (29.5, 87.7) 62 (3, 70) 4
*
*
Comanche County Urban Yes 57.3 (51.1, 64.1) 50 (25, 65) 66 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Coal County Rural Yes 88.6 (58.0, 131.7) 4 (1, 67) 6
*
*
Cleveland County Urban Yes 50.3 (46.6, 54.2) 63 (48, 68) 142 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Choctaw County Rural Yes 63.1 (46.3, 84.6) 40 (3, 70) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Cherokee County Rural Yes 79.7 (68.4, 92.4) 10 (2, 37) 39 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.2)
Carter County Rural Yes 64.5 (55.0, 75.4) 37 (9, 62) 35 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Canadian County Urban Yes 46.2 (41.5, 51.3) 68 (53, 70) 72 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Caddo County Rural Yes 70.9 (57.5, 86.6) 19 (4, 61) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Bryan County Rural Yes 68.1 (57.6, 80.2) 23 (7, 60) 31 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Blaine County Rural Yes 89.8 (63.0, 124.8) 3 (1, 62) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.8)
Beckham County Rural Yes 65.2 (50.9, 82.4) 33 (5, 68) 15 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Atoka County Rural Yes 76.7 (57.4, 100.9) 13 (1, 65) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.3)
Alfalfa County Rural Yes 58.8 (36.0, 93.5) 47 (2, 70) 4
*
*
Adair County Rural Yes 62.9 (48.5, 80.4) 41 (5, 69) 14 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
Beaver County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/12/2024 6:43 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top