Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Oklahoma *** 595.0 (589.0, 601.0) N/A 7,830 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.7)
United States *** 512.0 (511.4, 512.6) N/A 568,048 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.8)
Atoka County *** 645.0 (553.0, 748.1) 31 (2, 71) 36 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.9, 8.2)
Texas County *** 655.2 (557.5, 764.8) 24 (1, 71) 33 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.6, 7.2)
Love County *** 736.6 (619.1, 870.0) 4 (1, 64) 29 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.0, 3.8)
Major County *** 604.5 (489.2, 738.9) 45 (2, 76) 20 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.1, 2.2)
Garvin County *** 712.7 (641.5, 789.5) 8 (1, 45) 75 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 0.9)
Okfuskee County *** 823.7 (708.7, 952.0) 1 (1, 30) 37 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.1)
Jefferson County *** 683.5 (546.7, 844.0) 12 (1, 74) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Kiowa County *** 750.9 (629.0, 889.5) 2 (1, 61) 27 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.1)
Caddo County *** 684.3 (614.8, 759.7) 11 (1, 54) 71 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.8)
Harmon County *** 612.3 (421.3, 860.3) 41 (1, 77) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9)
Jackson County *** 626.7 (551.4, 709.4) 37 (4, 71) 51 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.6)
Choctaw County *** 679.5 (590.7, 778.1) 14 (1, 65) 43 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Custer County *** 657.9 (582.9, 739.8) 22 (2, 63) 57 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Grant County *** 553.6 (413.2, 726.3) 63 (2, 77) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Pawnee County *** 638.1 (553.6, 731.9) 33 (2, 70) 42 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Hughes County *** 734.5 (633.7, 846.9) 5 (1, 58) 39 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.5)
Seminole County *** 666.8 (594.9, 745.2) 17 (2, 63) 63 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Beckham County *** 682.2 (596.6, 776.6) 13 (1, 65) 47 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Cotton County *** 630.6 (496.6, 789.8) 36 (1, 76) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Greer County *** 713.6 (563.8, 891.1) 7 (1, 75) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Kay County *** 646.9 (594.8, 702.4) 29 (6, 61) 116 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.3)
Roger Mills County *** 577.1 (421.4, 772.4) 57 (1, 77) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Washita County *** 525.0 (432.4, 631.7) 68 (14, 77) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Alfalfa County *** 507.0 (388.9, 650.0) 72 (7, 77) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Cherokee County *** 605.3 (553.0, 661.2) 44 (12, 68) 101 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Kingfisher County *** 525.6 (442.3, 619.9) 67 (20, 77) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Cimarron County *** 504.3 (329.9, 740.7) 73 (1, 77) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.6)
Grady County *** 608.7 (559.5, 661.0) 42 (13, 67) 116 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Le Flore County *** 684.7 (631.9, 740.8) 10 (3, 45) 127 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
McIntosh County *** 621.4 (553.6, 695.4) 38 (5, 69) 63 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Pushmataha County *** 703.4 (605.0, 813.5) 9 (1, 63) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Washington County *** 595.0 (549.6, 643.2) 50 (17, 68) 130 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Creek County *** 654.1 (611.4, 699.1) 25 (6, 55) 178 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
Garfield County *** 574.3 (529.7, 621.6) 59 (25, 71) 125 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0)
Muskogee County *** 677.9 (632.2, 726.1) 15 (3, 47) 167 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.8, -0.1)
Nowata County *** 747.6 (635.6, 873.8) 3 (1, 59) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Pottawatomie County *** 646.3 (601.9, 693.1) 30 (6, 56) 160 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
Blaine County *** 630.8 (524.1, 753.1) 35 (2, 73) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Carter County *** 650.7 (598.0, 706.9) 27 (5, 57) 114 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Lincoln County *** 604.3 (546.6, 666.4) 46 (11, 69) 82 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Marshall County *** 593.5 (517.0, 678.4) 51 (7, 74) 44 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Pittsburg County *** 660.4 (608.1, 715.9) 21 (4, 56) 120 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Pontotoc County *** 619.3 (561.0, 682.1) 39 (7, 67) 84 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Woods County *** 535.3 (428.1, 661.5) 66 (7, 77) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Cleveland County *** 520.2 (497.6, 543.6) 69 (58, 74) 413 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Ellis County *** 579.5 (427.1, 768.5) 55 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Mayes County *** 664.4 (607.8, 724.9) 19 (3, 55) 104 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Murray County *** 670.8 (577.9, 774.5) 16 (1, 68) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Ottawa County *** 720.5 (653.9, 792.1) 6 (1, 41) 87 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Payne County *** 519.7 (477.2, 564.9) 70 (47, 76) 113 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Coal County *** 637.7 (502.4, 798.7) 34 (1, 76) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Comanche County *** 592.7 (556.0, 631.3) 52 (25, 66) 198 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Harper County *** 443.6 (307.8, 619.7) 76 (14, 77) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Haskell County *** 662.5 (567.3, 769.2) 20 (1, 69) 35 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Johnston County *** 600.6 (502.2, 712.7) 47 (3, 75) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Oklahoma County *** 592.6 (578.4, 606.9) 53 (37, 60) 1,381 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.9, -0.7)
Osage County *** 519.6 (475.0, 567.3) 71 (45, 76) 102 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Rogers County *** 578.2 (540.9, 617.4) 56 (28, 70) 183 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Sequoyah County *** 657.3 (601.5, 716.9) 23 (4, 58) 104 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Stephens County *** 597.7 (547.8, 650.9) 49 (17, 68) 108 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Canadian County *** 539.9 (507.3, 574.0) 65 (47, 73) 214 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
McClain County *** 616.9 (556.4, 682.1) 40 (7, 69) 79 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
McCurtain County *** 648.7 (586.6, 715.7) 28 (3, 62) 81 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Noble County *** 577.1 (483.3, 684.0) 58 (6, 76) 27 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Tillman County *** 640.7 (518.5, 783.0) 32 (1, 74) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.4)
Adair County *** 651.5 (571.0, 740.1) 26 (2, 70) 49 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Craig County *** 599.4 (515.2, 693.6) 48 (5, 74) 36 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Delaware County *** 571.3 (525.2, 620.3) 60 (26, 72) 118 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Latimer County *** 606.8 (510.3, 716.6) 43 (2, 75) 28 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Logan County *** 542.5 (491.2, 597.7) 64 (35, 75) 85 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Woodward County *** 454.2 (386.1, 530.8) 75 (56, 77) 32 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Bryan County *** 568.3 (518.6, 621.5) 61 (25, 72) 98 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Wagoner County *** 477.0 (440.1, 516.1) 74 (64, 77) 129 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Dewey County *** 582.9 (442.2, 754.6) 54 (1, 77) 12 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Tulsa County *** 565.6 (550.7, 580.8) 62 (47, 66) 1,131 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Beaver County *** 385.5 (276.9, 522.9) 77 (51, 77) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.0)
Okmulgee County *** 664.7 (607.5, 725.9) 18 (3, 55) 101 stable stable trend -6.8 (-13.8, 0.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/23/2021 5:42 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top