Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma N/A No 983.7 (972.5, 995.0) N/A 5,963 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.8, -0.6)
United States N/A No 844.0 (842.9, 845.1) N/A 441,232 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Jefferson County Rural No 1,368.7 (1,069.6, 1,725.0) 1 (1, 60) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.6)
Caddo County Rural No 1,357.3 (1,201.6, 1,527.5) 2 (1, 25) 56 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.5)
Okfuskee County Rural No 1,315.3 (1,098.1, 1,563.1) 3 (1, 50) 26 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.7)
Nowata County Rural No 1,298.1 (1,073.1, 1,556.4) 4 (1, 57) 23 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Kiowa County Rural No 1,285.6 (1,047.1, 1,561.7) 5 (1, 62) 21 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.6)
Garvin County Rural No 1,258.6 (1,115.2, 1,415.3) 6 (1, 41) 56 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.2, 1.6)
Sequoyah County Urban No 1,248.8 (1,133.6, 1,372.6) 7 (1, 33) 87 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Le Flore County Rural No 1,201.2 (1,096.8, 1,312.9) 8 (2, 37) 99 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.5)
Coal County Rural No 1,195.7 (919.6, 1,528.5) 9 (1, 74) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Ottawa County Rural No 1,180.3 (1,052.8, 1,319.0) 10 (1, 49) 63 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Seminole County Rural No 1,164.7 (1,021.9, 1,321.8) 11 (1, 55) 48 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.8)
Adair County Rural No 1,153.2 (985.9, 1,341.0) 12 (1, 64) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Grant County Rural No 1,150.3 (859.4, 1,508.2) 13 (1, 75) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
McIntosh County Rural No 1,146.1 (1,012.4, 1,292.5) 14 (2, 57) 54 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Pottawatomie County Rural No 1,137.6 (1,050.4, 1,230.0) 15 (5, 47) 128 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 5.1)
Harper County Rural No 1,137.1 (791.7, 1,582.1) 16 (1, 76) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.6)
Okmulgee County Urban No 1,136.0 (1,023.1, 1,257.9) 17 (3, 52) 75 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Love County Rural No 1,132.9 (923.5, 1,375.6) 18 (1, 72) 21 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.2)
Cotton County Urban No 1,129.9 (860.7, 1,456.2) 19 (1, 75) 12 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.6)
Pushmataha County Rural No 1,129.7 (949.3, 1,334.3) 20 (1, 69) 28 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Haskell County Rural No 1,124.7 (939.5, 1,335.9) 21 (1, 68) 26 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Carter County Rural No 1,123.6 (1,019.6, 1,235.4) 22 (4, 51) 87 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
McCurtain County Rural No 1,115.4 (992.0, 1,250.0) 23 (3, 59) 60 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Pittsburg County Rural No 1,109.1 (1,011.8, 1,213.3) 24 (6, 54) 96 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Blaine County Rural No 1,095.8 (882.0, 1,345.7) 25 (1, 74) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.8)
Muskogee County Rural No 1,091.9 (1,005.4, 1,183.8) 26 (7, 52) 120 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0)
Murray County Rural No 1,091.5 (922.9, 1,282.0) 27 (2, 70) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Creek County Urban No 1,086.5 (1,006.0, 1,171.9) 28 (8, 52) 137 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.1)
Kay County Rural No 1,082.9 (984.2, 1,188.8) 29 (6, 57) 89 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Mayes County Rural No 1,074.8 (966.2, 1,192.3) 30 (6, 61) 73 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Stephens County Rural No 1,061.1 (965.1, 1,164.0) 31 (9, 64) 91 falling falling trend -0.7 (-2.0, -0.1)
Lincoln County Urban No 1,060.9 (946.8, 1,184.9) 32 (7, 66) 64 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Choctaw County Rural No 1,060.5 (895.5, 1,246.9) 33 (3, 71) 30 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Beckham County Rural No 1,059.8 (903.1, 1,235.8) 34 (3, 71) 33 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Hughes County Rural No 1,059.4 (883.1, 1,260.5) 35 (2, 73) 26 stable stable trend 0.2 (-6.1, 4.5)
Marshall County Rural No 1,055.9 (904.9, 1,225.0) 36 (3, 71) 35 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Latimer County Rural No 1,052.1 (861.6, 1,272.1) 37 (2, 74) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Pawnee County Urban No 1,049.2 (886.2, 1,233.3) 38 (3, 72) 30 stable stable trend -0.7 (-7.0, 0.3)
Johnston County Rural No 1,049.0 (850.4, 1,280.0) 39 (2, 75) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Comanche County Urban No 1,033.8 (962.3, 1,109.2) 40 (16, 58) 158 falling falling trend -1.0 (-4.6, -0.5)
Rogers County Urban No 1,032.2 (960.5, 1,107.9) 41 (14, 59) 156 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Alfalfa County Rural No 1,032.0 (771.6, 1,351.7) 42 (1, 76) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Cherokee County Rural No 1,030.3 (932.1, 1,136.2) 43 (10, 64) 82 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
McClain County Urban No 1,025.0 (910.9, 1,149.3) 44 (8, 69) 61 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Noble County Rural No 987.9 (812.4, 1,189.8) 45 (5, 75) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Atoka County Rural No 986.7 (821.8, 1,175.0) 46 (6, 74) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.2)
Tillman County Rural No 985.9 (764.6, 1,251.4) 47 (2, 76) 14 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 5.6)
Grady County Urban No 977.0 (884.6, 1,076.4) 48 (19, 70) 84 falling falling trend -1.1 (-5.8, -0.4)
Oklahoma County Urban No 973.6 (946.7, 1,001.0) 49 (38, 59) 1,023 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.7, -0.4)
Craig County Rural No 973.3 (814.0, 1,154.6) 50 (7, 75) 26 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Washington County Rural No 964.6 (881.4, 1,053.5) 51 (24, 69) 100 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Dewey County Rural No 964.3 (685.2, 1,318.8) 52 (1, 76) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Payne County Rural No 958.5 (875.1, 1,047.8) 53 (24, 69) 98 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Jackson County Rural No 957.9 (820.9, 1,111.1) 54 (12, 74) 35 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Garfield County Urban No 930.7 (848.1, 1,019.1) 55 (31, 72) 95 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Pontotoc County Rural No 928.8 (825.9, 1,041.0) 56 (25, 74) 60 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Custer County Rural No 927.6 (796.9, 1,073.5) 57 (15, 75) 36 falling falling trend -5.3 (-15.1, -0.7)
Texas County Rural No 918.0 (750.4, 1,111.5) 58 (8, 76) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Bryan County Rural No 915.8 (824.3, 1,014.7) 59 (30, 74) 74 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Osage County Urban No 910.8 (824.6, 1,003.6) 60 (33, 74) 83 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Tulsa County Urban No 903.8 (876.5, 931.7) 61 (49, 68) 853 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Washita County Rural No 901.5 (722.4, 1,111.3) 62 (10, 76) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.7)
Woods County Rural No 891.1 (689.8, 1,132.7) 63 (7, 76) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 0.9)
Harmon County Rural No 885.1 (550.6, 1,346.8) 64 (1, 76) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 1.7)
Woodward County Rural No 882.7 (744.4, 1,039.1) 65 (21, 76) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Roger Mills County Rural No 865.7 (586.6, 1,230.2) 66 (2, 76) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.7)
Kingfisher County Rural No 864.1 (707.5, 1,045.1) 67 (15, 76) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Logan County Urban No 861.9 (769.9, 961.9) 68 (41, 76) 66 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Canadian County Urban No 861.7 (803.4, 923.1) 69 (49, 74) 167 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.4)
Delaware County Rural No 861.2 (780.5, 948.0) 70 (43, 75) 85 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Greer County Rural No 823.3 (586.1, 1,123.6) 71 (9, 76) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.2)
Cleveland County Urban No 822.8 (782.8, 864.3) 72 (59, 75) 325 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Wagoner County Urban No 808.8 (740.2, 882.1) 73 (56, 76) 106 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Major County Rural No 782.8 (599.1, 1,005.0) 74 (22, 76) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7)
Beaver County Rural No 734.8 (515.2, 1,016.8) 75 (20, 76) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -1.1)
Ellis County Rural No 700.2 (470.8, 1,002.2) 76 (13, 76) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.7)
Cimarron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top