Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma No 967.7 (956.5, 979.0) N/A 5,789 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.8)
United States No 855.4 (854.2, 856.5) N/A 431,628 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.7)
Okfuskee County No 1,334.3 (1,119.2, 1,578.8) 1 (1, 37) 27 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.7)
Kiowa County No 1,204.3 (978.1, 1,466.9) 2 (1, 67) 20 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Love County No 1,200.7 (985.3, 1,449.2) 3 (1, 67) 22 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Caddo County No 1,189.8 (1,054.5, 1,337.7) 4 (1, 46) 56 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.1)
Ottawa County No 1,156.6 (1,033.0, 1,290.8) 5 (1, 48) 64 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Nowata County No 1,143.0 (942.4, 1,373.7) 6 (1, 70) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Hughes County No 1,139.7 (957.7, 1,346.1) 7 (1, 65) 28 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Garvin County No 1,137.4 (1,006.5, 1,280.5) 8 (1, 55) 55 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.2)
Le Flore County No 1,135.4 (1,035.6, 1,242.2) 9 (1, 45) 97 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.3)
Texas County No 1,125.7 (931.3, 1,348.2) 10 (1, 69) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Choctaw County No 1,120.4 (954.7, 1,306.6) 11 (1, 66) 33 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Murray County No 1,112.0 (939.4, 1,307.0) 12 (1, 66) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Cotton County No 1,110.8 (850.9, 1,425.1) 13 (1, 75) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.5)
Haskell County No 1,106.9 (929.9, 1,307.7) 14 (1, 69) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Sequoyah County No 1,103.4 (997.3, 1,217.7) 15 (2, 53) 81 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Muskogee County No 1,088.6 (1,003.1, 1,179.3) 16 (3, 49) 122 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Pottawatomie County No 1,084.6 (999.7, 1,174.8) 17 (4, 49) 122 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Creek County No 1,067.4 (987.0, 1,152.6) 18 (4, 54) 132 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.1)
McClain County No 1,065.0 (947.2, 1,193.3) 19 (2, 62) 61 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Carter County No 1,063.1 (963.4, 1,170.3) 20 (3, 58) 84 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Okmulgee County No 1,060.0 (954.5, 1,174.0) 21 (3, 59) 74 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Seminole County No 1,053.4 (920.6, 1,199.9) 22 (2, 67) 46 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Greer County No 1,046.2 (784.9, 1,366.2) 23 (1, 77) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Pushmataha County No 1,041.1 (870.2, 1,235.9) 24 (1, 72) 26 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Johnston County No 1,036.0 (849.0, 1,252.1) 25 (1, 74) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Rogers County No 1,034.2 (960.7, 1,111.8) 26 (8, 57) 149 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
McCurtain County No 1,033.7 (919.0, 1,158.8) 27 (3, 65) 59 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Latimer County No 1,028.7 (848.4, 1,235.8) 28 (1, 74) 23 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Jefferson County No 1,027.4 (788.8, 1,315.1) 29 (1, 76) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Kay County No 1,020.9 (926.3, 1,122.6) 30 (7, 63) 86 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Atoka County No 1,020.8 (854.5, 1,209.8) 31 (2, 73) 27 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.4, 6.7)
Comanche County No 1,017.2 (945.2, 1,093.1) 32 (10, 59) 150 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Pittsburg County No 1,017.0 (923.5, 1,117.4) 33 (6, 64) 87 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Harmon County No 1,013.3 (658.2, 1,489.1) 34 (1, 77) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.1)
Beckham County No 1,013.3 (858.2, 1,188.0) 35 (2, 74) 31 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.8)
Mayes County No 1,011.7 (909.3, 1,122.5) 36 (6, 66) 73 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Washington County No 1,009.8 (924.3, 1,101.2) 37 (9, 64) 104 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.1)
Coal County No 1,009.6 (767.4, 1,304.2) 38 (1, 77) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Lincoln County No 1,008.2 (898.7, 1,127.3) 39 (6, 68) 62 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
McIntosh County No 1,003.4 (881.6, 1,137.3) 40 (5, 71) 49 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Custer County No 995.1 (860.3, 1,145.0) 41 (3, 73) 40 stable stable trend -3.9 (-7.6, 0.0)
Pawnee County No 988.4 (833.9, 1,162.9) 42 (2, 74) 29 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Roger Mills County No 987.3 (694.1, 1,361.7) 43 (1, 77) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.1)
Noble County No 986.5 (808.6, 1,191.8) 44 (2, 76) 22 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Adair County No 985.1 (838.7, 1,149.8) 45 (3, 74) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Jackson County No 973.1 (833.8, 1,129.0) 46 (4, 73) 35 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Cherokee County No 969.4 (873.2, 1,073.2) 47 (11, 70) 76 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Oklahoma County No 966.5 (939.5, 994.0) 48 (31, 57) 998 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.9, -0.1)
Dewey County No 964.9 (700.7, 1,296.0) 49 (1, 77) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.5, 0.0)
Grant County No 964.9 (703.4, 1,291.1) 50 (1, 77) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Pontotoc County No 962.1 (856.2, 1,077.4) 51 (11, 72) 60 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Stephens County No 956.5 (865.3, 1,054.6) 52 (15, 70) 81 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Grady County No 954.9 (863.5, 1,053.2) 53 (15, 70) 81 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Craig County No 934.7 (780.8, 1,110.1) 54 (4, 76) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Tillman County No 928.0 (717.2, 1,181.3) 55 (2, 77) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.9, 4.1)
Tulsa County No 926.0 (897.7, 954.9) 56 (39, 65) 833 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Garfield County No 921.0 (837.7, 1,010.3) 57 (23, 73) 91 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Canadian County No 917.3 (854.5, 983.6) 58 (32, 70) 163 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Kingfisher County No 915.8 (755.7, 1,099.7) 59 (4, 77) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Washita County No 903.2 (725.8, 1,110.7) 60 (5, 77) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Woods County No 902.5 (702.1, 1,142.2) 61 (3, 77) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Blaine County No 897.3 (714.5, 1,112.7) 62 (5, 77) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Harper County No 888.3 (602.6, 1,261.9) 63 (1, 77) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Delaware County No 887.3 (806.3, 974.2) 64 (32, 74) 90 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Alfalfa County No 887.1 (659.0, 1,169.1) 65 (2, 77) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Payne County No 874.3 (794.1, 960.3) 66 (35, 75) 88 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Marshall County No 873.7 (742.5, 1,021.4) 67 (15, 76) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Woodward County No 872.6 (732.4, 1,031.8) 68 (15, 77) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Major County No 870.2 (674.9, 1,104.6) 69 (5, 77) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.5)
Osage County No 838.6 (755.6, 928.1) 70 (42, 76) 76 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Logan County No 830.4 (737.0, 932.3) 71 (39, 77) 59 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Cleveland County No 825.6 (783.6, 869.2) 72 (58, 75) 297 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Bryan County No 817.5 (732.2, 910.0) 73 (45, 77) 67 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Wagoner County No 762.7 (694.6, 835.7) 74 (59, 77) 95 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Ellis County No 703.7 (473.6, 1,005.7) 75 (13, 77) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Beaver County No 692.5 (483.2, 962.0) 76 (14, 77) 7 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.1)
Cimarron County No 656.3 (381.4, 1,052.7) 77 (4, 77) 3
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/22/2024 6:39 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top