Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma No 209.2 (206.4, 212.0) N/A 4,451 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
United States No 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) N/A 315,770 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Okfuskee County No 331.7 (276.0, 395.9) 1 (1, 27) 26 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Greer County No 315.2 (237.7, 411.0) 2 (1, 64) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Cotton County No 277.9 (206.0, 369.0) 3 (1, 73) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Nowata County No 266.7 (214.7, 328.6) 4 (1, 66) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.2)
Ottawa County No 260.6 (228.4, 296.3) 5 (1, 47) 49 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Seminole County No 259.6 (223.5, 300.3) 6 (1, 53) 39 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Caddo County No 255.9 (222.0, 293.6) 7 (1, 54) 43 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Sequoyah County No 251.9 (224.4, 282.1) 8 (2, 51) 64 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Kiowa County No 251.8 (196.6, 319.1) 9 (1, 73) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Okmulgee County No 248.0 (219.8, 278.9) 10 (2, 52) 59 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Harmon County No 247.2 (148.6, 390.7) 11 (1, 76) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.6)
Jefferson County No 246.4 (180.8, 330.0) 12 (1, 76) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Johnston County No 245.6 (197.2, 303.4) 13 (1, 72) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Muskogee County No 244.7 (222.7, 268.3) 14 (4, 46) 96 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Atoka County No 241.5 (198.3, 291.9) 15 (2, 71) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.0)
Garvin County No 241.2 (208.6, 277.8) 16 (2, 63) 40 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Latimer County No 240.0 (193.5, 295.8) 17 (2, 73) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Love County No 239.8 (189.4, 300.7) 18 (1, 74) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Pittsburg County No 238.5 (213.5, 265.7) 19 (4, 57) 69 stable stable trend -5.6 (-11.9, 1.3)
Le Flore County No 238.3 (213.5, 265.4) 20 (4, 58) 71 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Cherokee County No 236.5 (210.8, 264.6) 21 (4, 60) 65 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Washington County No 233.9 (211.0, 258.9) 22 (5, 57) 79 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.2, 3.1)
Creek County No 233.8 (213.7, 255.4) 23 (6, 54) 104 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Pottawatomie County No 233.1 (211.9, 255.9) 24 (5, 58) 92 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Hughes County No 232.6 (188.3, 284.6) 25 (2, 75) 20 falling falling trend -17.4 (-25.6, -8.3)
Carter County No 232.0 (206.4, 259.9) 26 (5, 62) 63 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Beckham County No 231.7 (193.5, 275.3) 27 (2, 71) 27 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Roger Mills County No 231.2 (155.3, 336.4) 28 (1, 76) 6
*
*
Stephens County No 227.9 (203.1, 255.2) 29 (5, 63) 65 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Dewey County No 227.8 (149.4, 332.8) 30 (1, 76) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Craig County No 226.9 (185.5, 275.6) 31 (2, 75) 22 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Harper County No 226.7 (147.8, 335.7) 32 (1, 76) 5
*
*
Kay County No 226.6 (202.2, 253.5) 33 (6, 65) 64 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
McCurtain County No 226.3 (197.4, 258.4) 34 (5, 69) 46 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Grant County No 225.2 (156.3, 318.3) 35 (1, 76) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.5)
Choctaw County No 225.2 (186.1, 271.1) 36 (3, 74) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Haskell County No 224.7 (182.3, 275.2) 37 (3, 75) 20 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Murray County No 224.1 (182.9, 272.7) 38 (3, 74) 22 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Lincoln County No 223.6 (196.5, 253.8) 39 (6, 69) 51 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
McIntosh County No 223.3 (191.7, 259.7) 40 (4, 71) 38 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Blaine County No 222.2 (171.5, 284.2) 41 (2, 76) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Pushmataha County No 221.5 (178.9, 272.9) 42 (3, 75) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Noble County No 220.9 (175.2, 276.0) 43 (2, 76) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Texas County No 220.3 (176.3, 271.2) 44 (3, 76) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Pawnee County No 219.9 (181.1, 265.2) 45 (3, 75) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Pontotoc County No 217.4 (190.0, 247.7) 46 (8, 71) 46 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Mayes County No 216.3 (191.0, 244.3) 47 (10, 69) 56 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
McClain County No 215.1 (187.3, 245.9) 48 (8, 72) 45 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Coal County No 214.2 (152.0, 295.9) 49 (1, 76) 8 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.3)
Comanche County No 213.6 (196.3, 232.0) 50 (19, 66) 117 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Washita County No 211.7 (163.7, 270.0) 51 (3, 76) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Custer County No 208.5 (175.4, 246.0) 52 (8, 75) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Bryan County No 206.9 (183.4, 232.7) 53 (15, 72) 58 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Grady County No 204.7 (182.3, 229.2) 54 (18, 73) 65 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Jackson County No 203.5 (169.4, 242.6) 55 (8, 76) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Oklahoma County No 202.8 (196.2, 209.6) 56 (40, 64) 745 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Marshall County No 202.6 (168.5, 242.7) 57 (7, 76) 26 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Rogers County No 199.9 (183.1, 218.0) 58 (31, 72) 108 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Garfield County No 199.2 (178.1, 222.1) 59 (22, 74) 67 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Tulsa County No 199.0 (191.9, 206.3) 60 (43, 67) 625 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Delaware County No 196.4 (175.6, 219.5) 61 (28, 74) 71 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Adair County No 195.8 (162.3, 234.6) 62 (14, 76) 25 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Alfalfa County No 195.3 (140.6, 266.5) 63 (3, 76) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Kingfisher County No 194.6 (155.1, 241.5) 64 (9, 76) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Woodward County No 189.4 (155.1, 229.1) 65 (15, 76) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Canadian County No 188.5 (173.4, 204.5) 66 (42, 75) 124 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Payne County No 183.4 (163.8, 204.8) 67 (40, 76) 65 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Major County No 183.4 (133.6, 247.4) 68 (5, 76) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.8)
Ellis County No 182.9 (115.7, 278.9) 69 (2, 76) 5 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Logan County No 180.6 (158.0, 205.5) 70 (38, 76) 49 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Tillman County No 179.8 (131.3, 242.3) 71 (6, 76) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.5, 6.4)
Osage County No 178.2 (157.9, 200.8) 72 (43, 76) 59 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Cleveland County No 177.2 (166.9, 188.0) 73 (57, 76) 234 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Woods County No 176.5 (130.2, 235.1) 74 (8, 76) 10 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Beaver County No 166.5 (112.3, 240.8) 75 (6, 76) 6 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.0)
Wagoner County No 165.0 (148.5, 182.9) 76 (60, 76) 77 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Cimarron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 9:45 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top