Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma No 149.6 (147.4, 151.8) N/A 3,833 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
United States No 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) N/A 283,896 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Oklahoma County No 151.7 (146.6, 156.9) 43 (26, 55) 710 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.5)
Tulsa County No 142.1 (136.9, 147.5) 58 (38, 64) 580 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Cleveland County No 129.4 (121.5, 137.7) 68 (50, 72) 207 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Canadian County No 141.3 (129.8, 153.6) 59 (28, 68) 114 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Comanche County No 153.2 (139.9, 167.5) 39 (12, 63) 100 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Rogers County No 151.7 (138.0, 166.5) 42 (15, 66) 93 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Creek County No 168.7 (152.7, 186.2) 17 (5, 54) 86 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.4)
Pottawatomie County No 164.3 (148.5, 181.5) 22 (6, 56) 82 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Muskogee County No 171.1 (154.4, 189.3) 15 (4, 51) 81 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Washington County No 151.7 (134.5, 170.8) 41 (10, 68) 62 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Garfield County No 147.7 (131.1, 165.9) 50 (11, 69) 62 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Payne County No 151.9 (134.9, 170.5) 40 (10, 66) 62 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Le Flore County No 173.8 (154.4, 195.2) 13 (2, 51) 61 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Wagoner County Yes 116.0 (103.1, 130.2) 71 (55, 75) 61 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Carter County No 168.8 (149.5, 190.1) 16 (3, 59) 59 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.7, 7.3)
Grady County No 145.6 (128.4, 164.7) 53 (15, 70) 54 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Pittsburg County No 157.0 (138.2, 178.1) 34 (7, 67) 54 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.7)
Sequoyah County No 175.3 (154.5, 198.4) 12 (2, 53) 53 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Kay County No 155.9 (136.6, 177.5) 35 (7, 67) 52 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Stephens County No 146.3 (128.0, 166.9) 52 (12, 70) 51 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Delaware County No 139.5 (121.8, 159.6) 61 (19, 72) 50 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Osage County No 142.8 (124.8, 162.9) 57 (16, 71) 50 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Mayes County No 166.1 (145.1, 189.5) 21 (3, 62) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Cherokee County No 148.4 (129.5, 169.4) 49 (11, 70) 47 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Okmulgee County No 157.7 (137.1, 180.9) 32 (5, 68) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Bryan County No 128.6 (111.4, 147.9) 69 (32, 74) 42 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Logan County No 131.6 (113.7, 151.7) 66 (27, 73) 41 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Ottawa County No 176.6 (152.6, 203.6) 10 (1, 56) 41 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
McCurtain County No 182.8 (157.5, 211.1) 7 (1, 54) 41 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
McClain County No 159.2 (137.5, 183.5) 28 (5, 67) 40 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Garvin County No 206.9 (177.9, 239.6) 2 (1, 30) 39 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.4)
Lincoln County No 148.8 (127.5, 173.0) 48 (8, 71) 37 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Pontotoc County No 140.1 (119.9, 162.9) 60 (15, 73) 36 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Caddo County No 183.4 (156.9, 213.7) 6 (1, 54) 36 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
McIntosh County No 154.2 (128.3, 185.0) 38 (4, 72) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Seminole County No 155.3 (129.4, 185.2) 37 (4, 71) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Custer County No 157.8 (131.1, 188.5) 31 (3, 70) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.7)
Jackson County No 163.5 (135.7, 195.5) 23 (2, 69) 25 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Adair County No 167.5 (138.0, 201.9) 19 (2, 68) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Beckham County No 162.8 (132.7, 198.2) 25 (2, 70) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Marshall County No 151.6 (121.8, 187.3) 44 (3, 73) 20 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.9)
Murray County No 191.4 (153.6, 236.5) 3 (1, 62) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Pawnee County No 150.8 (121.2, 186.5) 45 (3, 73) 19 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Choctaw County No 158.0 (126.9, 195.6) 30 (2, 72) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Hughes County No 179.4 (143.7, 222.9) 9 (1, 67) 18 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.7)
Haskell County No 166.9 (131.0, 210.7) 20 (1, 71) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Texas County No 168.7 (133.5, 210.4) 18 (1, 70) 16 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.5, 8.8)
Craig County No 146.6 (113.6, 187.0) 51 (3, 74) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Pushmataha County No 157.1 (123.0, 199.7) 33 (2, 74) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Woodward County Yes 117.8 (92.2, 148.8) 70 (25, 75) 15 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
Atoka County No 144.8 (112.4, 185.0) 54 (3, 74) 15 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Love County No 212.4 (165.8, 269.2) 1 (1, 56) 15 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.1)
Okfuskee County No 175.7 (135.8, 225.0) 11 (1, 72) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Kingfisher County No 131.5 (101.5, 168.2) 67 (8, 75) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.1)
Nowata County No 159.1 (121.3, 206.7) 29 (1, 74) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Noble County No 144.0 (109.6, 187.3) 55 (3, 75) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Kiowa County No 183.7 (138.2, 241.0) 5 (1, 71) 12 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.2)
Washita County No 143.9 (107.9, 189.2) 56 (3, 75) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Blaine County No 162.5 (120.9, 215.1) 26 (1, 74) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Johnston County No 138.1 (101.7, 184.1) 62 (3, 75) 11 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Tillman County No 184.4 (134.6, 248.7) 4 (1, 72) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Latimer County Yes 115.2 (84.7, 155.3) 72 (17, 75) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Major County No 172.5 (124.1, 234.8) 14 (1, 74) 10 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.1, 3.1)
Woods County No 155.4 (111.8, 212.1) 36 (1, 74) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Coal County No 148.9 (104.3, 210.6) 47 (1, 75) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Jefferson County No 132.9 (88.7, 194.6) 65 (2, 75) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Cotton County No 136.0 (90.9, 199.1) 64 (1, 75) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
Grant County No 181.4 (116.3, 272.7) 8 (1, 75) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.3, 3.2)
Dewey County No 148.9 (97.6, 221.5) 46 (1, 75) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Ellis County No 163.4 (104.6, 249.1) 24 (1, 75) 5
*
*
Alfalfa County Yes 106.8 (67.1, 168.3) 74 (9, 75) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
Greer County Yes 107.6 (66.2, 170.3) 73 (6, 75) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.6)
Roger Mills County No 137.6 (82.5, 222.2) 63 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Beaver County Yes 81.5 (45.1, 139.6) 75 (27, 75) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.7)
Harmon County No 162.0 (90.7, 274.1) 27 (1, 75) 3 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 3.8)
Cimarron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/20/2024 8:34 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top