Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6, 7 No 176.6 (174.7, 178.6) N/A 6,878 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.9, -0.7)
United States 6 No 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) N/A 464,265 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Harmon County 6, 7 No 258.6 (168.7, 386.4) 1 (1, 76) 7
*
*
Okfuskee County 6, 7 No 241.2 (202.0, 286.8) 2 (1, 49) 28
*
*
Love County 6, 7 No 233.1 (194.2, 278.7) 3 (1, 56) 27
*
*
Kiowa County 6, 7 No 231.7 (190.8, 280.1) 4 (1, 60) 25
*
*
Sequoyah County 6, 7 No 226.4 (206.4, 248.2) 5 (1, 29) 99 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Garvin County 6, 7 No 226.4 (202.8, 252.3) 6 (1, 34) 72
*
*
Texas County 6, 7 No 212.2 (178.1, 251.9) 7 (1, 67) 29 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.9, 6.1)
Nowata County 6, 7 No 212.0 (176.5, 254.1) 8 (1, 68) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
Ottawa County 6, 7 No 210.6 (188.9, 234.5) 9 (1, 50) 74 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Greer County 6, 7 No 209.5 (163.4, 266.8) 10 (1, 75) 15
*
*
Le Flore County 6, 7 No 209.0 (192.0, 227.3) 11 (3, 42) 118 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1)
Murray County 6, 7 No 208.1 (176.9, 244.1) 12 (1, 68) 35
*
*
Blaine County 6, 7 No 206.4 (169.2, 250.6) 13 (1, 73) 24
*
*
Cotton County 6, 7 No 205.3 (160.2, 261.6) 14 (1, 76) 15
*
*
Jefferson County 6, 7 No 204.7 (159.5, 260.6) 15 (1, 75) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.6)
Caddo County 6, 7 No 204.6 (181.3, 230.7) 16 (2, 59) 58
*
*
Grant County 6, 7 No 202.4 (152.1, 266.3) 17 (1, 76) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.2)
Beckham County 6, 7 No 201.5 (175.7, 230.4) 18 (2, 65) 46
*
*
Pittsburg County 6, 7 No 200.6 (183.4, 219.3) 19 (4, 56) 108 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Seminole County 6, 7 No 199.7 (175.9, 226.4) 20 (2, 65) 53
*
*
Atoka County 6, 7 No 199.5 (169.7, 234.1) 21 (2, 71) 34 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Coal County 6, 7 No 198.4 (154.0, 254.9) 22 (1, 76) 15
*
*
Carter County 6, 7 No 197.4 (180.4, 215.8) 23 (5, 56) 104
*
*
Haskell County 6, 7 No 196.3 (165.5, 232.2) 24 (2, 73) 31 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Hughes County 6, 7 No 195.0 (163.6, 231.8) 25 (1, 73) 29
*
*
Creek County 6, 7 No 194.9 (181.5, 209.0) 26 (8, 52) 167
*
*
McCurtain County 6, 7 No 194.2 (173.2, 217.4) 27 (5, 65) 67 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Pushmataha County 6, 7 No 194.1 (163.0, 231.0) 28 (2, 73) 30 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.1)
Muskogee County 6, 7 No 192.6 (177.4, 209.0) 29 (8, 60) 125 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Kay County 6, 7 No 191.7 (175.1, 209.7) 30 (7, 62) 107 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Tillman County 6, 7 No 190.5 (148.6, 243.5) 31 (1, 76) 15
*
*
Pottawatomie County 6, 7 No 190.3 (176.6, 204.9) 32 (10, 58) 148 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Washington County 6, 7 No 190.1 (174.7, 206.7) 33 (8, 62) 125
*
*
Custer County 6, 7 No 189.7 (166.0, 216.0) 34 (4, 71) 49
*
*
McClain County 6, 7 No 188.8 (170.3, 208.8) 35 (8, 67) 79
*
*
Latimer County 6, 7 No 188.0 (155.1, 227.8) 36 (1, 75) 25
*
*
Comanche County 6, 7 No 187.5 (174.7, 201.0) 37 (13, 59) 165 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Okmulgee County 6, 7 No 187.0 (168.1, 207.8) 38 (8, 70) 76
*
*
Lincoln County 6, 7 No 186.0 (167.9, 205.7) 39 (9, 69) 82
*
*
Stephens County 6, 7 No 184.7 (168.7, 202.1) 40 (12, 67) 106
*
*
Pawnee County 6, 7 No 182.6 (156.4, 212.6) 41 (6, 75) 37
*
*
Ellis County 6, 7 No 180.6 (131.8, 244.5) 42 (1, 77) 10
*
*
Marshall County 6, 7 No 179.8 (154.0, 210.0) 43 (7, 75) 39 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Choctaw County 6, 7 No 179.0 (150.5, 212.6) 44 (4, 75) 30 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.4, 0.7)
Jackson County 6, 7 No 178.3 (153.9, 205.9) 45 (7, 75) 40
*
*
McIntosh County 6, 7 No 178.2 (156.1, 203.6) 46 (10, 74) 53
*
*
Craig County 6, 7 No 176.4 (148.5, 209.2) 47 (6, 76) 30
*
*
Rogers County 6, 7 No 175.2 (163.6, 187.5) 48 (24, 70) 177
*
*
Oklahoma County 6, 7 No 175.0 (170.4, 179.8) 49 (37, 61) 1,111 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.6)
Washita County 6, 7 No 174.2 (143.4, 210.4) 50 (5, 76) 25
*
*
Mayes County 6, 7 No 174.1 (156.9, 192.9) 51 (18, 73) 81 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Grady County 6, 7 No 173.9 (159.3, 189.6) 52 (22, 72) 109
*
*
Osage County 6, 7 No 173.6 (157.2, 191.4) 53 (19, 73) 90 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Major County 6, 7 No 173.2 (136.8, 217.4) 54 (4, 77) 18
*
*
Johnston County 6, 7 No 172.9 (142.2, 209.6) 55 (6, 76) 23
*
*
Noble County 6, 7 No 171.9 (142.8, 206.3) 56 (9, 76) 26
*
*
Garfield County 6, 7 No 171.6 (157.7, 186.6) 57 (24, 73) 120
*
*
Woods County 6, 7 No 170.4 (136.6, 211.0) 58 (5, 77) 19
*
*
Bryan County 6, 7 No 170.2 (154.3, 187.4) 59 (23, 74) 89 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Dewey County 6, 7 No 167.3 (125.0, 221.9) 60 (2, 77) 11
*
*
Payne County 6, 7 No 166.8 (153.2, 181.3) 61 (31, 74) 117
*
*
Adair County 6, 7 No 166.3 (139.1, 198.5) 62 (11, 77) 28 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.3)
Delaware County 6, 7 No 166.0 (150.8, 182.7) 63 (29, 75) 102 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Roger Mills County 6, 7 No 165.4 (118.9, 228.2) 64 (1, 77) 9
*
*
Canadian County 6, 7 No 164.9 (155.0, 175.2) 65 (40, 74) 216
*
*
Kingfisher County 6, 7 No 164.8 (138.6, 195.2) 66 (14, 77) 29
*
*
Tulsa County 6, 7 No 164.4 (159.7, 169.2) 67 (50, 71) 975 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Harper County 6, 7 No 161.4 (111.7, 230.9) 68 (1, 77) 8
*
*
Logan County 6, 7 No 160.6 (145.2, 177.5) 69 (35, 76) 83
*
*
Cherokee County 6, 7 No 160.0 (142.9, 179.2) 70 (31, 76) 68 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Pontotoc County 6, 7 No 159.4 (142.1, 178.6) 71 (31, 76) 64
*
*
Woodward County 6, 7 No 158.0 (135.5, 183.7) 72 (25, 77) 36
*
*
Cleveland County 6, 7 No 155.4 (148.5, 162.6) 73 (57, 75) 395 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Alfalfa County 6, 7 No 149.9 (114.8, 194.8) 74 (11, 77) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.1)
Wagoner County 6, 7 No 140.2 (129.0, 152.3) 75 (64, 77) 120
*
*
Beaver County 6, 7 No 129.8 (92.5, 180.7) 76 (16, 77) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.6)
Cimarron County 6, 7 Yes 105.7 (60.8, 186.0) 77 (18, 77) 4 stable stable trend -28.1 (-48.9, 1.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/29/2024 8:57 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

7 Data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) for this state and the user is cautioned against drawing conclusions from such data. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top