Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Oklahoma *** 61.5 (60.4, 62.6) N/A 2,528 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.9)
United States *** 48.4 (48.3, 48.5) N/A 171,025 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.0)
Washita County *** 62.9 (43.2, 88.8) 50 (2, 70) 8 rising rising trend 14.9 (1.5, 30.1)
Okfuskee County *** 90.4 (68.7, 117.6) 2 (1, 58) 12 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.3)
Grant County *** 94.7 (55.2, 152.4) 1 (1, 70) 4 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 2.9)
Atoka County *** 74.7 (56.4, 97.8) 19 (1, 68) 12 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.4)
Jefferson County *** 71.2 (44.1, 110.2) 30 (1, 70) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.6)
Blaine County *** 77.0 (54.3, 106.8) 15 (1, 69) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Greer County *** 77.0 (49.1, 116.5) 13 (1, 70) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0)
Cherokee County *** 73.8 (63.0, 86.1) 20 (3, 58) 36 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Jackson County *** 69.8 (55.7, 86.6) 33 (2, 67) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Kiowa County *** 75.0 (50.9, 107.3) 18 (1, 70) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.4)
Lincoln County *** 72.6 (60.6, 86.5) 24 (3, 61) 29 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.6)
Hughes County *** 77.4 (57.9, 101.8) 11 (1, 67) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Marshall County *** 78.3 (60.7, 100.0) 10 (1, 65) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Seminole County *** 84.2 (68.5, 102.5) 6 (1, 50) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Washington County *** 63.4 (53.8, 74.2) 48 (13, 67) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Caddo County *** 68.7 (55.9, 83.7) 38 (4, 66) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Garvin County *** 80.9 (66.3, 98.0) 8 (1, 54) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Love County *** 77.0 (55.0, 105.6) 14 (1, 68) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Ottawa County *** 81.5 (67.7, 97.4) 7 (1, 51) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Payne County *** 65.3 (56.2, 75.3) 43 (11, 64) 40 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Kay County *** 72.8 (61.8, 85.4) 23 (3, 58) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Stephens County *** 71.9 (61.0, 84.2) 26 (4, 59) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Texas County *** 51.4 (38.1, 67.8) 65 (20, 70) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Choctaw County *** 62.9 (46.6, 83.6) 49 (3, 70) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Craig County *** 73.4 (55.2, 96.3) 22 (1, 68) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Muskogee County *** 72.6 (63.8, 82.4) 25 (5, 52) 53 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Noble County *** 64.1 (45.7, 88.3) 46 (2, 70) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Osage County *** 66.7 (56.6, 78.2) 41 (8, 65) 36 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Creek County *** 71.4 (63.1, 80.7) 28 (6, 54) 58 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Grady County *** 60.0 (51.4, 69.7) 54 (21, 67) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Logan County *** 54.8 (46.0, 65.1) 62 (30, 70) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
McCurtain County *** 79.6 (66.1, 95.2) 9 (1, 53) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Okmulgee County *** 70.9 (59.4, 84.1) 31 (4, 62) 30 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Wagoner County *** 47.8 (41.3, 55.1) 69 (50, 70) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Carter County *** 69.5 (59.5, 80.8) 35 (6, 62) 37 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Cleveland County *** 54.3 (50.3, 58.4) 64 (47, 68) 148 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Kingfisher County *** 47.9 (34.0, 66.1) 68 (22, 70) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
McIntosh County *** 68.9 (54.5, 86.7) 37 (3, 67) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.4)
Pottawatomie County *** 65.1 (57.1, 74.0) 44 (13, 63) 51 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Pushmataha County *** 62.5 (45.0, 85.8) 51 (3, 70) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.7)
Le Flore County *** 69.9 (60.1, 81.0) 32 (6, 61) 39 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Garfield County *** 61.3 (52.7, 71.0) 53 (17, 66) 39 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
McClain County *** 55.4 (45.7, 66.8) 61 (24, 70) 24 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Pawnee County *** 71.3 (54.7, 91.8) 29 (2, 68) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Custer County *** 65.6 (52.0, 81.7) 42 (5, 69) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Haskell County *** 68.1 (48.9, 92.7) 40 (1, 70) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Pittsburg County *** 77.4 (66.0, 90.2) 12 (2, 51) 36 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Sequoyah County *** 76.3 (65.1, 89.0) 16 (2, 53) 36 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Bryan County *** 64.7 (54.7, 76.1) 45 (9, 66) 31 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Comanche County *** 58.5 (52.2, 65.3) 56 (31, 67) 67 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Nowata County *** 73.7 (53.0, 100.9) 21 (1, 69) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Pontotoc County *** 59.8 (49.1, 72.3) 55 (13, 69) 23 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Canadian County *** 49.9 (44.8, 55.5) 67 (52, 70) 72 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Oklahoma County *** 58.2 (55.8, 60.7) 57 (43, 62) 462 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.2)
Tulsa County *** 56.9 (54.3, 59.6) 58 (44, 64) 378 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Woods County *** 54.3 (33.8, 83.2) 63 (4, 70) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.7)
Johnston County *** 56.1 (38.0, 80.3) 60 (5, 70) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
Latimer County *** 64.0 (44.1, 90.5) 47 (1, 70) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Mayes County *** 68.5 (57.7, 80.9) 39 (5, 63) 31 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Delaware County *** 61.9 (51.9, 73.6) 52 (11, 68) 31 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Murray County *** 76.0 (56.6, 100.5) 17 (1, 67) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.2)
Rogers County *** 50.1 (43.9, 57.0) 66 (48, 70) 52 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Beckham County *** 69.5 (55.0, 86.8) 34 (3, 67) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Tillman County *** 90.3 (62.3, 127.6) 3 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 0.0)
Adair County *** 71.8 (57.2, 89.4) 27 (2, 66) 17 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Woodward County *** 39.1 (27.9, 53.6) 70 (48, 70) 8 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Coal County *** 56.4 (32.6, 92.9) 59 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Cotton County *** 69.0 (40.8, 110.2) 36 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Ellis County *** 85.6 (50.7, 138.3) 4 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Major County *** 84.5 (56.7, 121.8) 5 (1, 69) 7
*
*
Alfalfa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/29/2022 3:18 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of estimates:
Alfalfa, Beaver, Cimarron, Dewey, Harmon, Harper, Roger Mills

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top