Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2012-2016

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 161.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Oklahoma Yes 62.6 (61.5, 63.7) 2,529 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
United States Yes 51.3 (51.2, 51.4) 177,172 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
Grant County Yes 67.3 (37.1, 114.3) 3 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.1)
Jefferson County Yes 92.1 (62.1, 133.0) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.5, 3.2)
Greer County Yes 70.8 (44.7, 108.1) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.5)
Hughes County Yes 95.9 (74.3, 122.3) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.0)
Jackson County Yes 79.6 (64.2, 97.5) 20 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.6)
Atoka County Yes 67.2 (49.7, 89.4) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.9)
Cotton County Yes 94.6 (63.2, 137.5) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6)
Kiowa County Yes 82.2 (57.4, 114.7) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.2)
Choctaw County Yes 80.2 (61.7, 103.0) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.6)
Lincoln County Yes 74.1 (62.0, 88.2) 29 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Marshall County Yes 82.7 (63.6, 106.1) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.7)
Cherokee County Yes 72.0 (61.2, 84.2) 34 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Caddo County Yes 61.8 (49.7, 76.2) 19 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Love County Yes 80.2 (57.1, 110.1) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.6)
Okmulgee County Yes 83.9 (71.6, 97.9) 36 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Pushmataha County Yes 77.5 (56.5, 104.7) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Washington County Yes 69.2 (59.4, 80.3) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Craig County Yes 81.5 (63.0, 104.4) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Kay County Yes 70.7 (60.1, 82.7) 34 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Seminole County Yes 84.5 (69.6, 102.0) 24 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Wagoner County Yes 53.5 (46.6, 61.3) 45 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Garvin County Yes 76.5 (62.3, 93.1) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Grady County Yes 65.3 (56.1, 75.6) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Kingfisher County Yes 43.7 (30.6, 61.0) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
McCurtain County Yes 83.4 (70.1, 98.7) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Muskogee County Yes 73.6 (65.1, 83.1) 57 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Osage County Yes 61.3 (51.9, 72.0) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Blaine County Yes 71.6 (49.7, 100.7) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Carter County Yes 71.0 (61.0, 82.3) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Ottawa County Yes 72.1 (59.2, 87.1) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Payne County Yes 60.1 (51.4, 69.8) 36 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Texas County Yes 50.1 (37.3, 66.0) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Creek County Yes 68.5 (60.3, 77.5) 55 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Garfield County Yes 70.8 (61.6, 81.0) 46 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Pottawatomie County Yes 66.2 (57.9, 75.3) 49 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Haskell County Yes 66.2 (47.4, 90.5) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.1)
Le Flore County Yes 73.6 (63.5, 85.0) 41 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Logan County Yes 52.6 (43.8, 62.7) 27 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Stephens County Yes 61.5 (51.7, 72.8) 30 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
McClain County Yes 60.8 (50.1, 73.1) 24 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
McIntosh County Yes 64.2 (49.9, 81.9) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Nowata County Yes 88.3 (64.8, 118.2) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
Cleveland County Yes 51.5 (47.6, 55.6) 136 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Latimer County Yes 78.8 (57.6, 106.1) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Pontotoc County Yes 57.8 (47.2, 70.0) 22 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Comanche County Yes 59.1 (52.9, 65.8) 68 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Bryan County Yes 74.7 (63.7, 87.1) 35 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Pawnee County Yes 68.7 (52.9, 88.3) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Pittsburg County Yes 70.3 (59.8, 82.2) 35 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Custer County Yes 59.6 (47.0, 74.7) 16 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Rogers County Yes 56.5 (50.0, 63.8) 56 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Sequoyah County Yes 72.7 (61.9, 85.0) 34 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Woodward County Yes 48.7 (36.0, 64.6) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Canadian County Yes 49.4 (44.1, 55.2) 64 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Noble County Yes 48.0 (31.7, 70.3) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Oklahoma County Yes 59.5 (57.0, 62.0) 458 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Tulsa County Yes 59.6 (56.9, 62.4) 386 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Woods County Yes 51.8 (31.3, 81.0) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.0, 1.0)
Delaware County Yes 65.4 (54.7, 77.8) 31 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Okfuskee County Yes 70.4 (51.1, 95.0) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Adair County Yes 81.2 (65.1, 100.1) 19 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Mayes County Yes 67.6 (57.1, 79.6) 32 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Murray County Yes 64.6 (47.5, 86.5) 10 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Johnston County Yes 51.0 (34.7, 73.3) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.5)
Beckham County Yes 53.9 (41.3, 69.4) 13 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.2)
Tillman County Yes 63.5 (41.0, 95.0) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.1)
Washita County Yes 33.4 (20.1, 52.8) 4 falling falling trend -17.2 (-28.4, -4.2)
Beaver County Yes 100.4 (65.8, 148.0) 6
*
*
Coal County Yes 54.0 (30.5, 90.1) 3
*
*
Dewey County Yes 55.9 (31.2, 94.8) 3
*
*
Ellis County Yes 89.2 (54.7, 140.7) 5
*
*
Major County Yes 86.6 (60.2, 121.8) 8
*
*
Alfalfa County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/07/2020 4:47 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Health Service Areas are a single county or cluster of contiguous counties which are relatively self-contained with respect to hospital care. For more detailed information, please see Health Service Area information page.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top