Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2012-2016

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 161.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Oklahoma Yes 154.9 (152.6, 157.1) 3,724 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.4)
United States Yes 137.7 (137.4, 137.9) 280,047 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.4)
Texas County Yes 151.9 (119.5, 190.4) 15 rising rising trend 9.2 (2.5, 16.4)
Okfuskee County No 222.3 (176.6, 277.1) 17 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.3, 6.1)
Major County No 166.6 (121.4, 224.9) 10 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.2, 3.8)
Marshall County No 177.6 (144.1, 217.5) 22 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.7, 3.0)
Cotton County No 214.7 (154.7, 292.3) 9 stable stable trend 1.4 (0.0, 2.9)
Grant County Yes 155.5 (102.2, 231.8) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.6, 3.5)
Jefferson County No 193.5 (139.4, 264.5) 9 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.1, 3.0)
Kiowa County No 237.2 (185.8, 299.8) 16 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.7)
Garvin County No 187.3 (160.3, 218.0) 36 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.5)
Hughes County No 181.3 (144.5, 225.9) 18 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.9)
Nowata County No 203.3 (158.6, 257.9) 15 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.1)
Washita County Yes 143.2 (109.5, 185.5) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.1)
Coal County No 163.9 (116.0, 228.9) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.1)
Pawnee County Yes 153.5 (123.3, 189.7) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.7)
Choctaw County No 193.4 (158.5, 234.6) 22 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Jackson County No 184.9 (155.0, 219.1) 28 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.5)
Grady County Yes 152.2 (133.8, 172.5) 51 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.4)
Kay County No 172.0 (152.3, 193.8) 59 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 0.9)
Love County No 193.4 (147.5, 250.2) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.8)
Pittsburg County No 167.3 (147.7, 189.0) 57 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.1)
Caddo County Yes 155.2 (130.2, 183.8) 29 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Kingfisher County Yes 119.4 (91.1, 154.4) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Custer County No 168.8 (141.6, 200.0) 28 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Greer County No 164.0 (113.7, 233.5) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.7)
Latimer County No 165.3 (127.0, 213.1) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.8)
Le Flore County No 172.4 (152.7, 194.0) 58 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Lincoln County Yes 147.1 (125.3, 171.9) 35 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.0)
Stephens County Yes 159.8 (140.6, 181.2) 53 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.6)
Washington County No 163.7 (146.0, 183.2) 67 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Garfield County Yes 154.4 (137.5, 172.9) 65 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Murray County No 174.8 (139.4, 217.6) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Okmulgee County No 185.8 (163.0, 211.2) 51 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Seminole County No 186.3 (158.7, 217.8) 34 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Woods County Yes 133.2 (92.0, 187.9) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.7)
Muskogee County No 169.3 (152.8, 187.2) 80 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Noble County Yes 132.7 (99.0, 175.3) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.1)
Tillman County No 175.5 (128.6, 236.1) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Atoka County Yes 136.1 (105.2, 174.4) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Beaver County Yes 157.8 (102.0, 234.8) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.3)
Beckham County Yes 145.5 (117.5, 178.5) 19 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Cherokee County Yes 158.2 (137.9, 180.6) 46 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Creek County Yes 156.4 (140.9, 173.4) 77 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
McCurtain County No 183.5 (158.5, 211.5) 41 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Osage County Yes 145.7 (127.2, 166.5) 48 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Pontotoc County Yes 156.6 (135.2, 180.6) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Alfalfa County Yes 125.1 (81.1, 190.4) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.7)
Blaine County Yes 154.9 (114.5, 206.1) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.1)
Carter County Yes 151.3 (132.8, 171.8) 51 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Craig County Yes 131.5 (101.9, 168.2) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Comanche County Yes 153.9 (140.3, 168.5) 95 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Ottawa County No 175.7 (151.6, 202.8) 40 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Wagoner County Yes 137.0 (122.0, 153.5) 63 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Canadian County Yes 148.0 (135.2, 161.8) 101 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Logan County Yes 132.5 (113.3, 154.3) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Oklahoma County Yes 158.9 (153.6, 164.4) 694 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.4)
Pottawatomie County No 164.6 (148.1, 182.4) 75 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Adair County No 174.2 (143.0, 210.3) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
McClain County Yes 152.0 (129.4, 177.6) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Tulsa County Yes 152.9 (147.2, 158.7) 574 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Delaware County Yes 135.7 (118.0, 155.7) 47 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Mayes County Yes 159.2 (138.8, 182.0) 45 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Cleveland County Yes 130.9 (122.4, 139.7) 185 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Haskell County Yes 118.6 (88.6, 156.7) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Payne County Yes 137.3 (120.5, 155.8) 51 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Rogers County Yes 144.2 (130.2, 159.5) 79 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Sequoyah County No 164.4 (143.8, 187.4) 48 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Pushmataha County Yes 148.0 (112.2, 193.0) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Johnston County Yes 147.5 (110.7, 193.7) 11 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Dewey County No 168.6 (114.6, 243.4) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.1)
Woodward County Yes 111.9 (87.2, 141.9) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
Bryan County Yes 140.3 (121.8, 161.0) 43 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.2)
McIntosh County Yes 130.7 (107.1, 159.2) 23 falling falling trend -7.5 (-12.1, -2.7)
Cimarron County No 304.0 (181.2, 482.3) 5
*
*
Ellis County No 193.6 (128.1, 285.2) 6
*
*
Harper County Yes 123.9 (71.9, 204.4) 4
*
*
Harmon County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/07/2020 5:06 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Health Service Areas are a single county or cluster of contiguous counties which are relatively self-contained with respect to hospital care. For more detailed information, please see Health Service Area information page.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top