Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

White (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma *** 176.7 (174.8, 178.6) N/A 7,060 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.8)
United States *** 153.4 (153.2, 153.6) N/A 505,697 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.7)
Beaver County *** 119.0 (85.6, 162.6) 77 (43, 77) 9 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Wagoner County *** 138.9 (127.7, 151.0) 76 (66, 77) 118 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Woodward County *** 141.1 (120.4, 164.5) 75 (49, 77) 34 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Harper County *** 142.7 (98.8, 201.4) 74 (6, 77) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Alfalfa County *** 143.4 (109.2, 186.9) 73 (17, 77) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Kingfisher County *** 156.4 (131.6, 184.9) 72 (23, 77) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Dewey County *** 159.8 (120.3, 210.4) 71 (4, 77) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Cherokee County *** 160.1 (143.1, 178.9) 70 (31, 76) 69 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Cleveland County *** 160.3 (153.3, 167.6) 69 (52, 73) 409 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Logan County *** 161.3 (145.7, 178.2) 68 (35, 75) 82 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Canadian County *** 161.4 (151.7, 171.7) 67 (46, 73) 212 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Washita County *** 163.0 (133.9, 197.1) 66 (10, 77) 24 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Roger Mills County *** 163.2 (117.8, 223.8) 65 (1, 77) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Woods County *** 163.3 (130.8, 202.2) 64 (6, 77) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Tulsa County *** 164.5 (159.9, 169.2) 63 (50, 70) 1,003 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Payne County *** 164.7 (151.2, 179.2) 62 (34, 74) 115 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Pontotoc County *** 165.2 (147.8, 184.3) 61 (26, 75) 68 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Cimarron County *** 167.7 (108.9, 252.3) 60 (1, 77) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.9)
Johnston County *** 168.7 (138.1, 205.0) 59 (6, 77) 23 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Bryan County *** 169.4 (153.9, 186.3) 58 (24, 74) 91 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Noble County *** 170.8 (141.9, 204.6) 57 (7, 77) 26 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Rogers County *** 171.5 (160.0, 183.6) 56 (30, 71) 171 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Delaware County *** 172.2 (156.6, 189.4) 55 (21, 73) 104 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Garfield County *** 172.5 (158.8, 187.0) 54 (25, 72) 125 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0)
Marshall County *** 173.6 (149.5, 201.1) 53 (8, 75) 40 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Ellis County *** 174.0 (128.0, 233.6) 52 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Comanche County *** 175.2 (163.2, 187.8) 51 (25, 69) 162 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Oklahoma County *** 175.5 (171.0, 180.1) 50 (37, 61) 1,182 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.7)
McIntosh County *** 176.2 (154.7, 200.9) 49 (9, 73) 53 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Osage County *** 178.9 (162.2, 197.0) 48 (14, 70) 92 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Jackson County *** 181.3 (158.6, 206.6) 47 (5, 73) 47 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.7)
Texas County *** 181.6 (154.1, 212.6) 46 (3, 74) 32 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.2, 5.4)
Grady County *** 181.7 (166.8, 197.7) 45 (13, 68) 114 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.1)
Mayes County *** 182.1 (164.7, 201.1) 44 (11, 70) 85 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Stephens County *** 182.3 (166.6, 199.2) 43 (12, 69) 106 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Washington County *** 182.4 (167.7, 198.3) 42 (13, 66) 124 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.1)
Adair County *** 182.9 (154.8, 215.5) 41 (3, 75) 32 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.0)
McClain County *** 183.9 (165.7, 203.6) 40 (10, 69) 78 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Lincoln County *** 184.3 (166.2, 204.1) 39 (8, 69) 80 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Major County *** 184.6 (148.6, 227.7) 38 (1, 76) 20 stable stable trend 1.1 (0.0, 2.2)
Grant County *** 185.6 (136.9, 247.5) 37 (1, 77) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.3)
Choctaw County *** 187.2 (158.5, 220.6) 36 (2, 73) 32 stable stable trend -14.7 (-28.9, 2.4)
Pottawatomie County *** 188.7 (175.1, 203.2) 35 (9, 60) 147 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Craig County *** 188.9 (160.1, 222.3) 34 (2, 73) 32 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Pawnee County *** 189.9 (163.3, 220.3) 33 (2, 72) 38 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Okmulgee County *** 191.1 (172.3, 211.7) 32 (5, 65) 80 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Caddo County *** 192.2 (170.1, 216.7) 31 (3, 69) 57 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Latimer County *** 193.4 (159.8, 233.5) 30 (1, 73) 26 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Custer County *** 193.9 (171.3, 218.7) 29 (3, 68) 55 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Tillman County *** 196.1 (157.0, 243.2) 28 (1, 75) 18 stable stable trend 3.3 (-3.5, 10.4)
Muskogee County *** 196.2 (181.1, 212.4) 27 (5, 55) 130 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Kay County *** 196.9 (180.4, 214.6) 26 (4, 56) 113 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Carter County *** 197.2 (180.3, 215.3) 25 (4, 58) 105 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Beckham County *** 198.1 (173.2, 225.8) 24 (1, 66) 47 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
McCurtain County *** 198.9 (177.7, 222.2) 23 (2, 64) 69 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Blaine County *** 199.0 (164.3, 239.7) 22 (1, 73) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Creek County *** 199.1 (185.6, 213.4) 21 (5, 48) 170 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Cotton County *** 200.1 (155.3, 255.5) 20 (1, 75) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Hughes County *** 201.7 (170.3, 238.3) 19 (1, 71) 31 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Greer County *** 201.9 (158.4, 255.1) 18 (1, 75) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Pushmataha County *** 204.6 (173.7, 240.8) 17 (1, 70) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Atoka County *** 204.6 (174.5, 239.3) 16 (1, 68) 34 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Murray County *** 204.8 (174.6, 239.2) 15 (1, 69) 35 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Coal County *** 207.3 (161.5, 264.7) 14 (1, 75) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Seminole County *** 207.5 (183.3, 234.4) 13 (1, 57) 56 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Haskell County *** 208.2 (176.3, 245.0) 12 (1, 68) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Nowata County *** 209.2 (174.4, 250.1) 11 (1, 70) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Jefferson County *** 209.3 (166.3, 261.5) 10 (1, 75) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.4)
Love County *** 209.9 (174.8, 250.6) 9 (1, 70) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Le Flore County *** 210.0 (193.2, 228.0) 8 (1, 43) 120 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Ottawa County *** 210.3 (188.8, 233.8) 7 (1, 50) 74 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Pittsburg County *** 210.9 (193.3, 229.8) 6 (1, 40) 114 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Sequoyah County *** 214.6 (195.3, 235.5) 5 (1, 40) 95 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Harmon County *** 214.8 (146.8, 306.3) 4 (1, 77) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 2.9)
Garvin County *** 216.9 (194.6, 241.2) 3 (1, 43) 72 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Kiowa County *** 235.0 (195.0, 281.6) 2 (1, 53) 26 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Okfuskee County *** 237.8 (199.3, 282.5) 1 (1, 49) 28 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/18/2021 9:37 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top