Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Colon & Rectum, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 74.4?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count ascending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Oklahoma N/A Yes 16.2 (15.7, 16.7) N/A 757 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -0.9)
United States N/A Yes 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 52,325 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Oklahoma County Urban Yes 15.2 (14.0, 16.5) 37 (25, 44) 126 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Tulsa County Urban Yes 13.9 (12.7, 15.2) 41 (30, 49) 103 falling falling trend -8.9 (-14.3, -1.3)
Cleveland County Urban Yes 13.2 (11.4, 15.1) 45 (30, 51) 42 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Canadian County Urban Yes 12.7 (10.4, 15.5) 49 (27, 51) 21 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.1)
Rogers County Urban Yes 16.5 (13.4, 20.2) 31 (10, 48) 20 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.4, 0.0)
Creek County Urban Yes 20.1 (16.2, 24.8) 17 (2, 39) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.8)
Comanche County Urban Yes 14.6 (11.7, 18.0) 40 (18, 51) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Pottawatomie County Rural Yes 19.2 (15.3, 23.9) 21 (3, 43) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Muskogee County Rural Yes 20.2 (16.1, 25.1) 16 (2, 41) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Payne County Rural Yes 20.7 (16.2, 26.1) 14 (1, 41) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 1.1)
Le Flore County Rural Yes 22.6 (17.6, 28.8) 6 (1, 36) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Kay County Rural Yes 21.7 (16.6, 27.9) 9 (1, 42) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Pittsburg County Rural Yes 21.1 (16.2, 27.2) 12 (1, 41) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Carter County Rural Yes 21.2 (16.2, 27.4) 11 (1, 43) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Washington County Rural Yes 19.0 (14.4, 24.7) 22 (2, 47) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Wagoner County Urban Yes 12.3 (9.3, 15.9) 50 (26, 51) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.5)
Bryan County Rural Yes 20.9 (15.9, 27.2) 13 (1, 43) 12 stable stable trend 15.1 (-0.7, 35.1)
Garfield County Urban Yes 14.9 (11.2, 19.4) 38 (13, 51) 12 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Cherokee County Rural Yes 19.9 (14.9, 26.2) 18 (1, 46) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.5)
Sequoyah County Urban Yes 21.4 (16.0, 28.0) 10 (1, 43) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.3)
Osage County Urban Yes 17.7 (13.2, 23.3) 27 (3, 50) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Pontotoc County Rural Yes 23.6 (17.6, 31.1) 4 (1, 39) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Grady County Urban Yes 14.7 (10.9, 19.6) 39 (11, 51) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Logan County Urban Yes 15.7 (11.5, 21.0) 35 (8, 51) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Lincoln County Urban Yes 19.6 (14.3, 26.5) 19 (1, 48) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Okmulgee County Urban Yes 18.2 (13.3, 24.5) 26 (3, 50) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Stephens County Rural Yes 13.8 (10.1, 18.8) 42 (14, 51) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.6)
McCurtain County Rural Yes 22.4 (16.1, 30.5) 8 (1, 45) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.5)
Delaware County Rural Yes 12.1 (8.4, 17.1) 51 (20, 51) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.0)
McClain County Urban Yes 16.2 (11.5, 22.4) 32 (5, 51) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.6)
Caddo County Rural Yes 24.9 (17.6, 34.2) 3 (1, 42) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 3.0)
Ottawa County Rural Yes 19.0 (13.3, 26.4) 23 (1, 50) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.0)
Mayes County Rural Yes 13.1 (9.0, 18.6) 46 (13, 51) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Garvin County Rural Yes 18.6 (12.4, 26.9) 24 (1, 51) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
McIntosh County Rural Yes 16.2 (10.6, 24.5) 34 (3, 51) 6
*
*
Custer County Rural Yes 17.1 (11.1, 25.3) 29 (2, 51) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.6)
Kingfisher County Rural Yes 25.6 (15.9, 39.1) 2 (1, 49) 5
*
*
Seminole County Rural Yes 13.7 (8.4, 21.3) 44 (7, 51) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.4)
Adair County Rural Yes 18.3 (11.2, 28.5) 25 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Beckham County Rural Yes 15.4 (9.3, 24.1) 36 (3, 51) 4
*
*
Choctaw County Rural Yes 20.6 (12.3, 32.8) 15 (1, 51) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.5, 3.2)
Craig County Rural Yes 19.6 (11.8, 31.3) 20 (1, 51) 4 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.4)
Jackson County Rural Yes 13.0 (7.8, 20.6) 47 (8, 51) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.5)
Nowata County Rural Yes 27.1 (16.2, 43.5) 1 (1, 50) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 2.0)
Pushmataha County Rural Yes 22.8 (13.2, 37.6) 5 (1, 51) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.9, 2.6)
Murray County Rural Yes 17.3 (10.1, 28.5) 28 (1, 51) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.7)
Texas County Rural Yes 17.0 (9.9, 27.2) 30 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Pawnee County Urban Yes 16.2 (9.3, 26.8) 33 (1, 51) 3 falling falling trend -2.4 (-5.0, -0.2)
Woodward County Rural Yes 13.7 (7.9, 22.4) 43 (4, 51) 3
*
*
Marshall County Rural Yes 13.0 (7.3, 22.1) 48 (7, 51) 3 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.9, 4.5)
Okfuskee County Rural Yes 22.4 (12.5, 37.5) 7 (1, 51) 3 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Alfalfa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atoka County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hughes County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Latimer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washita County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woods County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/03/2024 1:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top