Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Colon & Rectum, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma No 16.3 (15.7, 16.8) N/A 754 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
United States No 13.1 (13.1, 13.2) N/A 52,152 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.8)
Kiowa County No 28.4 (15.9, 47.4) 1 (1, 50) 3 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.4, 3.4)
Pushmataha County No 20.5 (11.4, 34.8) 11 (1, 51) 3 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 2.9)
Washita County No 26.3 (14.6, 43.6) 2 (1, 51) 3
*
*
Kingfisher County No 18.8 (11.0, 30.3) 18 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Woodward County No 14.6 (8.5, 23.4) 46 (3, 51) 4
*
*
Craig County No 17.7 (10.5, 28.5) 25 (1, 51) 4 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Nowata County No 24.8 (14.9, 39.9) 4 (1, 50) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.8)
Seminole County No 11.9 (7.0, 19.1) 50 (10, 51) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.4)
Adair County No 15.6 (9.4, 24.4) 39 (3, 51) 4
*
*
Jackson County No 15.1 (9.2, 23.4) 43 (3, 51) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.2)
Atoka County No 23.5 (14.5, 36.4) 6 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Choctaw County No 21.1 (13.2, 32.7) 9 (1, 51) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.6)
Marshall County No 18.1 (11.2, 28.2) 23 (1, 51) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.5, 3.7)
Murray County No 24.0 (15.1, 36.6) 5 (1, 49) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Custer County No 16.4 (10.5, 24.5) 32 (3, 51) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.4, 0.0)
Beckham County No 21.3 (13.7, 31.6) 8 (1, 50) 5
*
*
McIntosh County No 13.5 (8.8, 20.8) 49 (9, 51) 5
*
*
Garvin County No 19.8 (13.5, 28.0) 14 (1, 50) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Ottawa County No 17.0 (11.8, 23.8) 29 (3, 51) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Lincoln County No 15.7 (11.1, 21.8) 37 (6, 51) 8 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.8)
McCurtain County No 19.6 (13.8, 27.1) 15 (1, 50) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Mayes County No 15.7 (11.1, 21.7) 36 (5, 51) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
McClain County No 17.5 (12.4, 23.9) 27 (3, 50) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.7)
Bryan County No 14.7 (10.6, 20.1) 45 (9, 51) 9 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.2, -1.7)
Caddo County No 24.8 (17.9, 33.6) 3 (1, 42) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.5)
Logan County No 16.3 (11.8, 22.0) 33 (6, 51) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Pontotoc County No 20.2 (14.7, 27.1) 12 (1, 49) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 0.9)
Okmulgee County No 18.6 (13.7, 24.8) 21 (2, 50) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Stephens County No 16.1 (11.8, 21.6) 34 (6, 51) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Wagoner County No 9.9 (7.3, 13.2) 51 (39, 51) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Delaware County No 15.4 (11.3, 20.8) 41 (8, 51) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Kay County No 18.1 (13.4, 23.9) 24 (3, 49) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Pittsburg County No 17.5 (13.1, 23.1) 26 (4, 50) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Sequoyah County No 20.8 (15.6, 27.4) 10 (1, 46) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Osage County No 16.5 (12.4, 21.8) 31 (6, 50) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Grady County No 16.7 (12.6, 21.8) 30 (5, 50) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Le Flore County No 17.4 (13.2, 22.7) 28 (4, 50) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Garfield County No 15.8 (11.9, 20.5) 35 (7, 50) 12 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Carter County No 20.0 (15.2, 26.0) 13 (2, 47) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Cherokee County No 23.1 (17.5, 29.8) 7 (1, 40) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Washington County No 18.6 (14.1, 24.1) 20 (3, 49) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.7)
Payne County No 18.3 (14.1, 23.4) 22 (4, 48) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Pottawatomie County No 18.8 (14.9, 23.5) 19 (4, 48) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Muskogee County No 19.5 (15.5, 24.2) 16 (3, 45) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Rogers County No 14.8 (11.8, 18.3) 44 (15, 51) 17 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Creek County No 18.9 (15.1, 23.4) 17 (3, 47) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Comanche County No 15.7 (12.6, 19.2) 38 (11, 50) 19 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Canadian County No 13.8 (11.2, 16.9) 48 (21, 51) 20 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Cleveland County No 13.9 (12.0, 16.0) 47 (27, 50) 41 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Tulsa County No 15.5 (14.2, 16.8) 40 (23, 46) 111 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Oklahoma County No 15.1 (13.9, 16.4) 42 (25, 47) 124 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Alfalfa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hughes County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnston County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Latimer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Okfuskee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pawnee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Texas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woods County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 12:51 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top