Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Oklahoma N/A No 45.3 (44.4, 46.1) N/A 2,216 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.8, -2.2)
United States N/A No 32.4 (32.3, 32.5) N/A 136,831 falling falling trend -4.3 (-4.4, -4.1)
Kiowa County Rural No 70.2 (50.1, 96.4) 4 (1, 58) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.3)
Cotton County Urban No 54.4 (34.8, 83.5) 29 (1, 70) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.2)
Jefferson County Rural No 63.8 (41.7, 95.5) 13 (1, 69) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.6)
Coal County Rural No 70.8 (46.6, 104.8) 2 (1, 66) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.7)
Okfuskee County Rural No 64.4 (48.0, 85.2) 11 (1, 60) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5)
Caddo County Rural No 61.1 (49.7, 74.4) 17 (1, 50) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Major County Rural No 33.2 (19.2, 54.6) 68 (14, 70) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.2)
Alfalfa County Rural No 42.9 (25.2, 70.2) 50 (2, 70) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.0)
Atoka County Rural No 65.6 (50.6, 84.2) 7 (1, 54) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Love County Rural No 59.0 (42.2, 80.9) 18 (1, 66) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.5)
Washita County Rural No 39.7 (26.7, 57.6) 57 (11, 70) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Garvin County Rural No 55.5 (44.8, 68.2) 26 (3, 59) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Washington County Rural No 49.4 (42.5, 57.3) 41 (15, 59) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Hughes County Rural No 51.3 (37.7, 68.8) 35 (3, 69) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Marshall County Rural No 65.1 (51.6, 81.7) 9 (1, 50) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
McIntosh County Rural No 64.9 (53.2, 79.1) 10 (1, 46) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.1)
Nowata County Rural No 62.2 (45.0, 84.8) 15 (1, 66) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.3)
Okmulgee County Urban No 56.5 (47.6, 66.9) 23 (4, 52) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Pawnee County Urban No 52.7 (40.2, 68.3) 33 (3, 66) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Noble County Rural No 53.6 (39.0, 72.7) 32 (1, 68) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.0)
Ottawa County Rural No 70.3 (59.3, 83.0) 3 (1, 31) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Cherokee County Rural No 55.4 (47.3, 64.6) 27 (7, 51) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Haskell County Rural No 69.2 (52.6, 90.1) 5 (1, 50) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Kingfisher County Rural No 35.0 (24.1, 49.5) 65 (24, 70) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.1)
Lincoln County Urban No 49.9 (41.4, 59.8) 39 (11, 61) 25 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
McCurtain County Rural No 68.6 (57.7, 81.2) 6 (1, 35) 29 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Pottawatomie County Rural No 58.0 (51.1, 65.5) 20 (5, 43) 54 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Payne County Rural No 45.9 (39.4, 53.2) 48 (21, 64) 37 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Pittsburg County Rural No 57.2 (49.3, 66.3) 21 (4, 48) 38 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Seminole County Rural No 62.5 (50.9, 76.3) 14 (1, 51) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Craig County Rural No 46.1 (34.2, 61.5) 46 (7, 69) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Creek County Urban No 54.5 (48.2, 61.6) 28 (9, 48) 55 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Le Flore County Rural No 58.4 (50.4, 67.5) 19 (3, 45) 39 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Sequoyah County Urban No 65.2 (56.0, 75.6) 8 (1, 36) 37 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Adair County Rural No 61.5 (48.3, 77.4) 16 (1, 55) 15 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Beckham County Rural No 52.3 (40.4, 66.9) 34 (3, 65) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Mayes County Rural No 57.2 (48.4, 67.2) 22 (3, 50) 31 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Bryan County Rural No 46.3 (38.9, 54.8) 45 (18, 64) 29 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Carter County Rural No 51.1 (43.4, 59.8) 37 (11, 58) 33 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Murray County Rural No 73.1 (57.2, 92.5) 1 (1, 41) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.0)
Logan County Urban No 38.9 (32.2, 46.7) 59 (36, 69) 25 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Kay County Rural No 55.7 (47.7, 64.8) 24 (6, 51) 36 falling falling trend -1.5 (-7.4, -0.4)
Osage County Urban No 40.5 (34.1, 47.9) 56 (32, 69) 30 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Woodward County Rural No 33.8 (24.5, 45.7) 67 (36, 70) 9 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Pushmataha County Rural No 64.2 (49.0, 83.8) 12 (1, 55) 12 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
McClain County Urban No 45.9 (37.7, 55.5) 47 (15, 66) 23 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.4)
Dewey County Rural No 49.4 (28.2, 82.6) 42 (1, 70) 3 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.6, 0.5)
Johnston County Rural No 53.7 (37.7, 74.8) 30 (1, 69) 8 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.8)
Rogers County Urban No 42.4 (37.3, 48.0) 53 (33, 66) 52 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.2)
Stephens County Rural No 50.4 (42.7, 59.3) 38 (11, 59) 32 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -1.2)
Canadian County Urban No 35.0 (31.0, 39.3) 64 (52, 70) 58 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Delaware County Rural No 42.8 (36.2, 50.6) 51 (26, 67) 32 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.2)
Texas County Rural No 30.3 (20.5, 43.1) 69 (37, 70) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.8)
Grady County Urban No 49.7 (42.5, 57.8) 40 (13, 60) 35 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.4)
Garfield County Urban No 41.3 (35.1, 48.4) 55 (33, 68) 32 falling falling trend -2.4 (-15.2, -1.0)
Pontotoc County Rural No 42.5 (34.7, 51.6) 52 (23, 69) 21 falling falling trend -2.5 (-12.4, -1.4)
Latimer County Rural No 44.7 (31.0, 63.6) 49 (5, 70) 7 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.6)
Comanche County Urban No 47.4 (42.1, 53.2) 44 (23, 58) 60 falling falling trend -2.8 (-10.7, -1.4)
Tulsa County Urban No 37.9 (35.9, 39.9) 60 (51, 66) 292 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.6, -2.6)
Jackson County Rural No 48.6 (38.0, 61.4) 43 (8, 68) 15 falling falling trend -3.3 (-12.3, -1.2)
Choctaw County Rural No 55.6 (42.2, 72.5) 25 (2, 65) 12 falling falling trend -3.7 (-24.9, -1.0)
Oklahoma County Urban No 41.9 (39.9, 43.9) 54 (43, 60) 361 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.9, -2.3)
Cleveland County Urban No 34.4 (31.6, 37.5) 66 (55, 70) 111 falling falling trend -3.9 (-8.7, -2.3)
Muskogee County Rural No 53.6 (46.9, 61.1) 31 (10, 52) 47 falling falling trend -4.2 (-12.8, -1.3)
Blaine County Rural No 39.4 (25.5, 59.3) 58 (7, 70) 5 falling falling trend -4.3 (-22.0, -1.3)
Wagoner County Urban No 35.4 (30.4, 40.9) 63 (48, 70) 38 falling falling trend -7.6 (-17.4, -2.8)
Tillman County Rural No 28.8 (16.4, 48.8) 70 (30, 70) 3 falling falling trend -9.5 (-22.3, -5.4)
Custer County Rural No 37.5 (28.3, 48.9) 62 (28, 70) 12 falling falling trend -13.4 (-29.3, -1.6)
Ellis County Rural No 51.1 (28.6, 88.0) 36 (1, 70) 3
*
*
Woods County Rural No 37.9 (23.2, 59.2) 61 (7, 70) 4
*
*
Beaver County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/10/2024 1:55 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top