Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Breast, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma N/A No 22.4 (21.6, 23.3) N/A 562 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
United States N/A No 19.3 (19.2, 19.4) N/A 42,308 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
Beckham County Rural No 25.6 (14.5, 42.3) 11 (1, 37) 3
*
*
Bryan County Rural No 19.8 (13.3, 28.6) 32 (4, 37) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.4)
Caddo County Rural No 26.0 (16.3, 40.1) 9 (1, 37) 5
*
*
Canadian County Urban No 20.7 (16.6, 25.6) 28 (8, 37) 18 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.2)
Carter County Rural No 29.1 (21.3, 39.2) 5 (1, 33) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Cherokee County Rural No 21.6 (15.0, 30.5) 26 (3, 37) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 1.1)
Cleveland County Urban No 19.7 (16.8, 23.1) 33 (14, 36) 33 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.3)
Comanche County Urban No 25.6 (20.3, 31.8) 12 (2, 33) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Creek County Urban No 33.3 (26.6, 41.5) 2 (1, 18) 18 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.4)
Delaware County Rural No 24.4 (15.9, 36.1) 15 (1, 37) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.4)
Garfield County Urban No 24.2 (17.4, 32.7) 16 (2, 36) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Garvin County Rural No 26.4 (16.1, 41.1) 8 (1, 37) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 0.9)
Grady County Urban No 20.9 (14.6, 29.2) 27 (4, 37) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.7)
Kay County Rural No 27.1 (19.2, 37.3) 7 (1, 35) 9
*
*
Le Flore County Rural No 24.5 (17.5, 33.8) 14 (2, 36) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Lincoln County Urban No 18.1 (11.1, 28.3) 36 (5, 37) 4 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.4)
Logan County Urban No 22.1 (15.2, 31.4) 23 (2, 37) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.7)
Mayes County Rural No 30.5 (21.4, 42.4) 3 (1, 34) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.9)
McClain County Urban No 27.9 (19.4, 39.1) 6 (1, 36) 7 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.5, 16.1)
McCurtain County Rural No 36.4 (25.0, 51.3) 1 (1, 28) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.2, 3.6)
McIntosh County Rural No 22.5 (13.7, 36.8) 21 (1, 37) 4
*
*
Muskogee County Rural No 22.3 (16.2, 30.0) 22 (3, 37) 9 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Oklahoma County Urban No 23.9 (21.9, 26.0) 17 (8, 27) 111 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Okmulgee County Urban No 23.8 (16.2, 34.3) 18 (1, 37) 7 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Osage County Urban No 19.8 (13.4, 28.7) 31 (5, 37) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.4)
Ottawa County Rural No 20.5 (12.9, 31.7) 30 (2, 37) 5 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.5, -0.1)
Payne County Rural No 22.0 (15.9, 29.9) 24 (4, 37) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Pittsburg County Rural No 21.6 (14.7, 31.1) 25 (3, 37) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.7)
Pontotoc County Rural Yes 14.2 (8.6, 22.5) 37 (17, 37) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.3)
Pottawatomie County Rural No 25.9 (19.7, 33.6) 10 (1, 34) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Rogers County Urban No 23.1 (17.9, 29.4) 20 (4, 36) 14 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.4)
Seminole County Rural No 25.5 (15.7, 39.8) 13 (1, 37) 4
*
*
Sequoyah County Urban No 29.5 (21.1, 40.4) 4 (1, 34) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.6)
Stephens County Rural No 23.1 (15.9, 32.8) 19 (2, 37) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Tulsa County Urban No 20.7 (18.7, 22.8) 29 (15, 34) 85 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Wagoner County Urban No 18.7 (13.7, 25.1) 35 (9, 37) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.7)
Washington County Rural No 19.6 (13.3, 27.9) 34 (5, 37) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Adair County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alfalfa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atoka County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Craig County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hughes County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kingfisher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Latimer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nowata County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Okfuskee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pawnee County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pushmataha County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Texas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washita County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woods County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodward County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/04/2024 10:35 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top