Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Prostate, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 16.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma No 20.0 (19.1, 20.9) N/A 396 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
United States No 18.8 (18.7, 18.9) N/A 31,337 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Payne County Yes 13.0 (8.1, 19.8) 35 (13, 35) 4 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Grady County Yes 13.1 (7.6, 21.0) 34 (10, 35) 4 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.7, -2.0)
Logan County Yes 13.1 (7.6, 21.3) 33 (9, 35) 3 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.4, -2.5)
Osage County Yes 13.6 (8.3, 21.2) 32 (10, 35) 4 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.5, -2.1)
Cleveland County Yes 14.0 (11.2, 17.4) 31 (18, 35) 17 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.9)
Kay County Yes 15.3 (9.3, 23.8) 30 (5, 35) 4
*
*
Wagoner County Yes 15.5 (10.4, 22.2) 29 (7, 35) 6 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.7, -2.1)
Pittsburg County Yes 15.8 (9.9, 24.2) 28 (5, 35) 4 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.7, -1.8)
Bryan County Yes 16.3 (10.1, 24.9) 27 (4, 35) 4 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.4)
Pontotoc County No 17.0 (10.0, 27.2) 26 (2, 35) 4
*
*
Canadian County No 17.4 (12.8, 23.0) 25 (6, 35) 10 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.9, -2.1)
Carter County No 17.5 (11.0, 26.7) 24 (2, 35) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Mayes County No 18.1 (11.3, 27.9) 23 (2, 35) 4
*
*
Okmulgee County No 18.6 (11.5, 28.8) 22 (1, 35) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Delaware County No 18.7 (12.9, 27.0) 21 (3, 35) 7
*
*
Pottawatomie County No 19.5 (13.7, 27.0) 20 (2, 34) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.9)
Lincoln County No 20.0 (12.3, 31.0) 19 (1, 35) 4 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.9, -1.2)
Garfield County No 20.0 (13.8, 28.2) 18 (2, 34) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Creek County No 20.2 (14.6, 27.4) 17 (2, 33) 9 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.0)
McClain County No 20.2 (12.4, 31.3) 16 (1, 35) 4
*
*
Tulsa County No 20.2 (17.9, 22.7) 15 (6, 26) 58 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.7)
McIntosh County No 20.6 (12.2, 34.5) 14 (1, 35) 4 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.0, -1.4)
Ottawa County No 20.8 (12.4, 33.0) 13 (1, 35) 4
*
*
Muskogee County No 20.8 (14.7, 28.7) 12 (2, 34) 8 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.3)
Cherokee County No 21.0 (13.9, 30.6) 11 (1, 34) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.7)
Stephens County No 21.1 (14.0, 30.8) 10 (1, 34) 6 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.4)
Oklahoma County No 22.3 (20.0, 24.7) 9 (4, 21) 75 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.4)
Garvin County No 23.7 (14.2, 37.3) 8 (1, 35) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.9)
Washington County No 24.3 (17.5, 33.0) 7 (1, 30) 9 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.1)
Rogers County No 24.3 (18.5, 31.4) 6 (1, 27) 12 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.5, 6.8)
Sequoyah County No 24.6 (16.3, 35.7) 5 (1, 33) 6 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.4, -1.6)
Comanche County No 26.1 (20.0, 33.3) 4 (1, 24) 13 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.2)
Seminole County No 27.9 (16.9, 43.8) 3 (1, 33) 4
*
*
Le Flore County No 28.3 (19.9, 39.1) 2 (1, 26) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
McCurtain County No 28.5 (18.5, 42.1) 1 (1, 30) 5 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.3, -1.1)
Adair County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alfalfa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atoka County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beckham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caddo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Craig County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hughes County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnston County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kingfisher County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Latimer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nowata County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Okfuskee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pawnee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pushmataha County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Texas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washita County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woods County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodward County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/01/2022 10:13 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top