Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate ascending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Oklahoma N/A *** 5.8 (5.5, 6.2) N/A 274 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.6)
United States N/A *** 5.0 (4.9, 5.0) N/A 20,108 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.2, -2.1)
McClain County Urban *** 10.3 (6.5, 15.6) 1 (1, 23) 5
*
*
Sequoyah County Urban *** 8.8 (5.4, 13.6) 2 (1, 26) 4
*
*
Pottawatomie County Rural *** 8.4 (5.8, 11.8) 3 (1, 23) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.5)
McCurtain County Rural *** 8.2 (4.7, 13.6) 4 (1, 28) 3
*
*
Lincoln County Urban *** 8.2 (4.8, 13.1) 5 (1, 27) 4
*
*
Pittsburg County Rural *** 7.9 (5.0, 11.9) 6 (1, 27) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.7)
Mayes County Rural *** 7.7 (4.7, 12.1) 7 (1, 27) 4
*
*
Kay County Rural *** 7.4 (4.6, 11.5) 8 (1, 28) 4
*
*
Le Flore County Rural *** 7.3 (4.5, 11.4) 9 (1, 28) 4
*
*
Comanche County Urban *** 7.0 (5.0, 9.6) 10 (2, 26) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Okmulgee County Urban *** 6.9 (3.9, 11.3) 11 (1, 28) 3
*
*
Grady County Urban *** 6.6 (4.2, 10.1) 12 (1, 28) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.5)
Cherokee County Rural *** 6.4 (3.8, 10.2) 13 (1, 28) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.2)
Carter County Rural *** 6.1 (3.5, 9.9) 14 (1, 28) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Osage County Urban *** 6.1 (3.6, 9.8) 15 (2, 28) 4
*
*
Creek County Urban *** 5.9 (3.9, 8.7) 16 (3, 28) 6 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Tulsa County Urban *** 5.7 (4.9, 6.5) 17 (9, 25) 42 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.7)
Stephens County Rural *** 5.7 (3.1, 9.5) 18 (2, 28) 3 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 2.1)
Garfield County Urban *** 5.5 (3.4, 8.5) 19 (3, 28) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.9, 8.4)
Washington County Rural *** 5.5 (3.5, 8.4) 20 (4, 28) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.3)
Oklahoma County Urban *** 5.5 (4.8, 6.2) 21 (11, 25) 47 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Muskogee County Rural *** 5.1 (3.2, 7.9) 22 (5, 28) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.4)
Payne County Rural *** 5.1 (3.1, 7.9) 23 (5, 28) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Bryan County Rural *** 5.1 (2.9, 8.4) 24 (4, 28) 3
*
*
Rogers County Urban *** 4.7 (3.1, 6.9) 25 (8, 28) 6
*
*
Canadian County Urban *** 4.7 (3.2, 6.5) 26 (9, 28) 7 falling falling trend -19.3 (-36.0, -1.6)
Wagoner County Urban *** 4.6 (3.0, 6.9) 27 (8, 28) 5
*
*
Cleveland County Urban *** 4.0 (3.1, 5.2) 28 (17, 28) 12 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.0)
Adair County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alfalfa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atoka County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beckham County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caddo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Craig County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delaware County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garvin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hughes County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kingfisher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Latimer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McIntosh County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nowata County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Okfuskee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ottawa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pawnee County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pontotoc County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pushmataha County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Seminole County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Texas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washita County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woods County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodward County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/04/2025 5:41 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top