Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Leukemia, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma N/A *** 6.8 (6.5, 7.2) N/A 316 falling falling trend -5.5 (-10.4, -0.8)
United States N/A *** 5.9 (5.8, 5.9) N/A 23,472 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Wagoner County Urban *** 4.7 (3.0, 7.2) 29 (11, 29) 5
*
*
Payne County Rural *** 5.7 (3.5, 8.7) 28 (6, 29) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.6)
Creek County Urban *** 5.7 (3.7, 8.5) 27 (6, 29) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.2)
Bryan County Rural *** 5.7 (3.3, 9.4) 26 (4, 29) 3
*
*
Delaware County Rural *** 5.7 (3.3, 9.6) 25 (4, 29) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 2.1)
Cleveland County Urban *** 6.1 (4.9, 7.5) 24 (9, 29) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.1)
Logan County Urban *** 6.1 (3.5, 9.9) 23 (3, 29) 3
*
*
Rogers County Urban *** 6.3 (4.4, 8.8) 22 (5, 29) 8 stable stable trend -29.8 (-52.4, 0.6)
Carter County Rural *** 6.4 (3.8, 10.2) 21 (3, 29) 4
*
*
Comanche County Urban *** 6.4 (4.6, 8.8) 20 (5, 29) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Le Flore County Rural *** 6.5 (3.9, 10.3) 19 (3, 29) 4
*
*
Pottawatomie County Rural *** 6.8 (4.5, 9.8) 18 (3, 29) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.4)
Tulsa County Urban *** 6.8 (6.0, 7.7) 17 (9, 25) 50 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Oklahoma County Urban *** 7.0 (6.2, 7.8) 16 (8, 25) 57 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Canadian County Urban *** 7.1 (5.3, 9.2) 15 (4, 28) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.4)
Grady County Urban *** 7.2 (4.6, 11.0) 14 (2, 29) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Osage County Urban *** 7.3 (4.6, 11.1) 13 (2, 29) 5
*
*
Kay County Rural *** 7.5 (4.7, 11.5) 12 (1, 29) 5
*
*
Washington County Rural *** 7.7 (5.1, 11.2) 11 (2, 29) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 3.4)
Stephens County Rural *** 8.0 (5.1, 12.2) 10 (1, 29) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.2)
Sequoyah County Urban *** 8.4 (5.1, 13.1) 9 (1, 29) 4
*
*
Pontotoc County Rural *** 8.7 (5.3, 13.5) 8 (1, 29) 4
*
*
Muskogee County Rural *** 8.8 (6.1, 12.4) 7 (1, 27) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.2)
Cherokee County Rural *** 9.0 (5.9, 13.3) 6 (1, 28) 5
*
*
Pittsburg County Rural *** 9.1 (6.1, 13.3) 5 (1, 27) 6
*
*
Garfield County Urban *** 9.5 (6.6, 13.3) 4 (1, 25) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.7)
Ottawa County Rural *** 10.3 (6.2, 16.3) 3 (1, 28) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.1)
Caddo County Rural *** 11.1 (6.5, 18.0) 2 (1, 28) 3
*
*
Garvin County Rural *** 12.7 (7.9, 19.5) 1 (1, 23) 4
*
*
Adair County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alfalfa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atoka County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beckham County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Craig County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hughes County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kingfisher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Latimer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mayes County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McClain County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCurtain County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McIntosh County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nowata County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Okfuskee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Okmulgee County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pawnee County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pushmataha County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Seminole County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Texas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washita County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woods County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodward County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/13/2024 11:28 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top