Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 161.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma No 186.0 (184.1, 187.8) 8,058 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.7)
United States No 163.5 (163.3, 163.7) 586,354 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.5)
Roger Mills County Yes 123.0 (83.8, 176.2) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 1.1)
Woodward County Yes 134.1 (113.6, 157.3) 31 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Harper County Yes 136.8 (96.2, 191.1) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Beaver County Yes 146.9 (108.4, 195.4) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.1)
Woods County Yes 151.0 (119.8, 188.3) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Washita County Yes 153.5 (126.8, 184.6) 24 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Coal County Yes 158.3 (122.0, 203.3) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Logan County Yes 158.4 (143.1, 175.0) 81 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Texas County No 163.7 (138.7, 191.7) 31 stable stable trend 4.7 (-1.0, 10.6)
Alfalfa County No 164.5 (128.2, 209.5) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.1)
Osage County No 164.9 (150.9, 179.9) 108 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Noble County No 165.8 (138.0, 198.2) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Harmon County No 166.0 (112.8, 238.0) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.8, 3.3)
Cleveland County No 166.5 (159.2, 173.9) 415 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Canadian County No 167.6 (157.1, 178.5) 201 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Payne County No 168.5 (154.9, 183.0) 116 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Wagoner County No 168.9 (156.3, 182.4) 141 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Rogers County No 169.9 (158.7, 181.7) 177 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
McIntosh County No 173.5 (153.8, 195.6) 61 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Johnston County No 173.8 (144.1, 208.2) 25 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Kingfisher County No 175.1 (148.8, 204.9) 32 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Blaine County No 175.2 (144.2, 211.4) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Beckham County No 176.0 (152.8, 201.8) 42 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Greer County No 177.7 (139.1, 224.7) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Atoka County No 178.7 (151.8, 209.3) 33 rising rising trend 11.9 (2.9, 21.5)
Garfield County No 179.0 (165.5, 193.3) 135 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
McClain County No 179.0 (160.5, 199.1) 72 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Grant County No 179.7 (136.3, 234.3) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7)
Latimer County No 180.5 (151.1, 214.5) 28 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Tulsa County No 180.8 (176.2, 185.6) 1,180 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Comanche County No 181.6 (170.4, 193.2) 203 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.0)
Delaware County No 182.7 (167.5, 199.1) 117 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Stephens County No 183.4 (168.3, 199.6) 112 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Oklahoma County No 184.5 (180.2, 189.0) 1,410 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.9, -0.7)
Washington County No 184.7 (170.7, 199.7) 134 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Haskell County No 185.3 (157.3, 217.3) 33 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Dewey County No 187.1 (143.8, 240.8) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Major County No 187.2 (152.3, 228.5) 21 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 2.8)
Lincoln County No 188.7 (170.4, 208.5) 82 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Ellis County No 189.4 (144.0, 246.9) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Craig County No 190.3 (164.3, 219.8) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Pontotoc County No 190.7 (172.9, 209.8) 86 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Tillman County No 192.0 (155.4, 235.1) 20 stable stable trend 6.9 (-4.3, 19.3)
Bryan County No 192.6 (176.3, 210.1) 106 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Pawnee County No 193.6 (168.0, 222.2) 43 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Murray County No 193.9 (166.6, 224.7) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Love County No 194.5 (160.2, 234.4) 24 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Pottawatomie County No 194.9 (181.6, 209.0) 163 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Cherokee County No 195.2 (178.4, 213.1) 104 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Grady County No 197.9 (182.2, 214.6) 122 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Nowata County No 198.4 (166.7, 235.0) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Caddo County No 200.5 (179.9, 223.0) 70 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Mayes County No 202.0 (184.7, 220.5) 104 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Creek County No 203.2 (190.0, 217.1) 183 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.1)
Marshall County No 205.3 (179.3, 234.4) 48 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Carter County No 205.7 (189.6, 222.9) 123 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Kay County No 205.9 (189.8, 223.0) 127 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Muskogee County No 206.7 (193.1, 220.9) 178 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Custer County No 208.4 (185.9, 233.0) 64 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.9, 5.5)
Pittsburg County No 209.0 (192.8, 226.4) 126 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Garvin County No 209.2 (188.1, 232.1) 74 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
Cotton County No 211.5 (168.9, 262.5) 18 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Sequoyah County No 211.8 (194.2, 230.7) 110 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
McCurtain County No 212.3 (192.7, 233.4) 89 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Le Flore County No 212.9 (196.7, 230.1) 133 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Pushmataha County No 213.4 (182.4, 248.7) 37 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Seminole County No 214.2 (192.2, 238.3) 71 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.6)
Jackson County No 215.4 (191.4, 241.5) 60 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.1)
Ottawa County No 216.7 (196.9, 238.0) 91 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Okmulgee County No 221.8 (203.5, 241.4) 112 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.2)
Adair County No 222.5 (196.2, 251.3) 54 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Kiowa County No 225.6 (189.7, 266.9) 30 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Hughes County No 229.7 (199.7, 263.3) 44 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Jefferson County No 232.0 (188.8, 283.2) 21 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.8)
Choctaw County No 237.7 (208.6, 270.1) 50 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.3)
Okfuskee County No 243.7 (209.7, 282.0) 38 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.0)
Cimarron County No 265.1 (189.9, 363.5) 10 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2019 9:32 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top