Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2011-2015

White (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 161.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma No 185.0 (183.0, 187.0) 6,963 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.9, -0.7)
United States No 163.8 (163.6, 164.0) 499,171 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.4)
Cimarron County No 269.3 (192.6, 369.8) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 2.9)
Okfuskee County No 245.7 (207.2, 290.1) 30 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.6)
Choctaw County No 241.4 (208.0, 279.4) 40 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.3)
Jefferson County No 238.5 (193.2, 292.6) 20 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.0)
Hughes County No 226.8 (194.1, 264.3) 36 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Kiowa County No 226.6 (189.1, 270.4) 27 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.6)
Sequoyah County No 223.1 (203.0, 244.8) 95 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
McCurtain County No 221.3 (198.8, 245.8) 74 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Le Flore County No 220.9 (203.2, 239.7) 121 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Adair County No 217.1 (185.1, 253.8) 35 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Cotton County No 214.3 (168.6, 269.9) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Jackson County No 213.8 (188.9, 241.2) 55 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 1.2)
Ottawa County No 213.4 (192.2, 236.6) 77 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Pittsburg County No 212.7 (195.1, 231.8) 111 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Garvin County No 211.3 (189.2, 235.6) 69 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Pushmataha County No 211.2 (179.2, 248.6) 32 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Muskogee County No 209.2 (193.7, 225.7) 140 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Marshall County No 207.7 (180.2, 238.8) 44 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Pawnee County No 205.6 (177.8, 237.1) 40 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Custer County No 205.3 (182.1, 230.6) 59 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.8, 5.6)
Okmulgee County No 204.9 (185.2, 226.3) 82 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Kay County No 204.3 (187.6, 222.1) 117 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Creek County No 203.7 (189.8, 218.4) 166 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Murray County No 201.8 (172.3, 235.7) 35 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Haskell County No 201.2 (169.5, 237.7) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Carter County No 200.7 (183.8, 219.0) 105 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Grady County No 199.8 (183.4, 217.3) 114 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
Nowata County No 199.8 (164.4, 241.5) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Caddo County No 198.8 (175.7, 224.3) 55 stable stable trend -0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Craig County No 198.5 (169.1, 232.4) 33 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Seminole County No 198.3 (174.9, 224.3) 54 stable stable trend -0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Latimer County No 197.8 (163.4, 238.4) 25 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Bryan County No 196.8 (179.3, 215.8) 96 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Love County No 191.5 (156.1, 233.2) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Pottawatomie County No 191.2 (177.3, 206.0) 143 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Mayes County No 190.4 (172.3, 210.1) 84 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Major County No 188.8 (153.3, 231.0) 21 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 2.8)
Ellis County No 186.6 (141.2, 244.7) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Stephens County No 186.1 (170.4, 202.9) 107 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Lincoln County No 185.2 (166.6, 205.6) 75 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Washington County No 184.6 (169.7, 200.6) 121 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Oklahoma County No 184.4 (179.6, 189.2) 1,162 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.7)
McClain County No 182.0 (162.8, 202.9) 68 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Pontotoc County No 181.5 (163.0, 201.7) 72 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Garfield County No 180.6 (166.6, 195.5) 129 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.2)
Cherokee County No 180.1 (161.6, 200.5) 72 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Comanche County No 179.4 (167.0, 192.4) 159 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Beckham County No 179.3 (155.3, 206.0) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Dewey County No 178.1 (136.9, 230.3) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Grant County No 177.7 (134.0, 233.3) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Delaware County No 177.2 (160.6, 195.4) 96 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Atoka County No 176.5 (147.7, 209.9) 28 rising rising trend 13.6 (3.3, 24.8)
Tulsa County No 176.4 (171.4, 181.4) 995 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Johnston County No 176.0 (143.8, 214.3) 22 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
McIntosh County No 175.9 (154.0, 200.9) 52 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Tillman County No 175.4 (138.9, 219.7) 17 stable stable trend 6.8 (-4.7, 19.8)
Kingfisher County No 174.3 (147.5, 204.7) 31 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Canadian County No 171.3 (160.3, 182.7) 191 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Greer County No 170.8 (132.0, 219.0) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Coal County No 170.7 (129.8, 222.8) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Cleveland County No 170.1 (162.5, 178.0) 387 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Rogers County No 169.7 (157.9, 182.1) 159 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Payne County No 168.8 (154.7, 183.9) 109 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Alfalfa County No 166.6 (129.6, 213.0) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Wagoner County No 166.5 (153.3, 180.7) 125 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Osage County No 166.5 (150.6, 183.8) 85 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Blaine County No 165.5 (134.1, 203.0) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Texas County No 163.7 (138.4, 192.3) 30 stable stable trend 4.2 (-1.4, 10.1)
Noble County No 161.9 (133.4, 195.3) 23 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Logan County Yes 156.1 (140.2, 173.4) 73 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Harmon County Yes 155.9 (102.8, 230.3) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.5, 3.7)
Washita County Yes 153.8 (126.7, 185.6) 23 stable stable trend -0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Woods County Yes 149.6 (118.2, 187.6) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.7)
Beaver County Yes 146.9 (107.9, 196.3) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.3, 0.0)
Woodward County Yes 138.0 (116.8, 161.9) 31 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Harper County Yes 135.0 (94.4, 189.6) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.1)
Roger Mills County Yes 126.5 (86.2, 181.9) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/18/2019 1:16 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top