Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oregon by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oregon Yes 44.4 (43.6, 45.3) N/A 2,049 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -1.8)
United States Yes 47.3 (47.2, 47.4) N/A 168,038 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Coos County Yes 65.3 (57.0, 74.7) 1 (1, 12) 55 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Malheur County Yes 60.1 (48.0, 74.6) 2 (1, 23) 18 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.3, 5.4)
Grant County Yes 58.2 (36.4, 91.1) 3 (1, 32) 6 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.6)
Tillamook County Yes 58.2 (45.9, 73.3) 4 (1, 25) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Douglas County Yes 57.7 (51.6, 64.3) 5 (1, 16) 79 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Klamath County Yes 57.2 (49.5, 66.0) 6 (1, 19) 44 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Umatilla County Yes 57.2 (49.7, 65.6) 7 (1, 19) 44 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Curry County Yes 56.7 (44.2, 72.7) 8 (1, 26) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Union County Yes 55.9 (43.2, 71.4) 9 (1, 26) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Lincoln County Yes 55.4 (46.2, 66.1) 10 (1, 23) 34 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Clatsop County Yes 54.7 (45.0, 66.1) 11 (1, 25) 26 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Josephine County Yes 54.4 (47.7, 61.9) 12 (2, 21) 57 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Wasco County Yes 54.1 (42.5, 68.1) 13 (1, 26) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Crook County Yes 52.2 (40.0, 67.4) 14 (1, 28) 15 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.5)
Linn County Yes 50.7 (45.3, 56.6) 15 (5, 23) 71 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Polk County Yes 49.5 (42.7, 57.2) 16 (4, 26) 41 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.2)
Lane County Yes 48.8 (45.6, 52.1) 17 (9, 22) 201 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Columbia County Yes 46.9 (39.6, 55.5) 18 (5, 28) 32 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Jackson County Yes 45.2 (41.4, 49.4) 19 (12, 26) 113 stable stable trend -8.2 (-18.6, 3.4)
Jefferson County Yes 44.9 (33.6, 59.0) 20 (2, 32) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Marion County Yes 44.2 (41.1, 47.5) 21 (14, 27) 157 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Multnomah County Yes 44.1 (42.1, 46.2) 22 (16, 26) 377 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.5, -2.1)
Clackamas County Yes 41.5 (38.9, 44.3) 23 (18, 28) 198 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Yamhill County Yes 41.1 (35.8, 46.9) 24 (14, 30) 47 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Lake County Yes 40.6 (23.6, 67.3) 25 (1, 32) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.5)
Wallowa County Yes 37.4 (20.2, 66.3) 26 (1, 32) 4
*
*
Morrow County Yes 35.5 (22.4, 54.4) 27 (5, 32) 5 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.3)
Baker County Yes 34.9 (23.5, 51.0) 28 (10, 32) 7 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Washington County Yes 34.4 (32.4, 36.6) 29 (25, 32) 212 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.7, -2.2)
Deschutes County Yes 34.2 (30.7, 38.0) 30 (24, 32) 78 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.7)
Benton County Yes 33.2 (27.8, 39.4) 31 (23, 32) 31 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Hood River County Yes 32.9 (23.5, 45.1) 32 (16, 32) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Gilliam County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harney County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/29/2023 4:25 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top