Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oregon by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oregon No 174.0 (171.6, 176.4) N/A 4,271 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.9, -1.6)
United States No 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) N/A 315,770 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Baker County No 178.7 (148.5, 214.6) 20 (1, 33) 26 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Benton County No 156.8 (141.1, 173.9) 30 (16, 34) 77 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Clackamas County No 167.9 (160.5, 175.5) 26 (16, 30) 410 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Clatsop County No 183.7 (160.6, 209.5) 15 (2, 30) 50 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Columbia County No 191.5 (170.7, 214.2) 8 (1, 28) 67 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Coos County No 204.0 (186.7, 222.8) 4 (1, 18) 112 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Crook County No 188.9 (162.2, 219.6) 10 (1, 30) 39 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Curry County No 183.7 (159.3, 212.5) 14 (1, 31) 47 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Deschutes County No 144.6 (134.9, 154.9) 33 (27, 34) 177 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.4)
Douglas County No 203.1 (190.0, 217.1) 5 (1, 15) 191 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Grant County No 194.5 (148.0, 255.3) 7 (1, 33) 14 rising rising trend 22.5 (1.9, 47.1)
Harney County No 179.4 (133.1, 239.4) 17 (1, 34) 11 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -0.9)
Hood River County No 160.3 (129.5, 196.4) 29 (4, 34) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Jackson County No 171.2 (162.0, 180.9) 24 (12, 30) 269 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Jefferson County No 166.6 (138.1, 199.5) 27 (3, 34) 26 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Josephine County No 212.5 (197.3, 228.7) 2 (1, 12) 157 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Klamath County No 210.4 (191.5, 230.8) 3 (1, 16) 98 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Lake County No 164.0 (125.3, 214.3) 28 (1, 34) 12 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Lane County No 179.1 (171.4, 187.1) 18 (9, 26) 425 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Lincoln County No 190.0 (170.5, 211.4) 9 (2, 28) 81 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Linn County No 201.3 (187.3, 216.2) 6 (1, 17) 161 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Malheur County No 175.8 (149.5, 205.6) 22 (2, 33) 32 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Marion County No 179.0 (170.2, 188.1) 19 (9, 27) 324 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1)
Morrow County No 151.1 (112.6, 199.2) 31 (3, 34) 11 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.4, -1.6)
Multnomah County No 174.9 (168.6, 181.4) 23 (12, 27) 644 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.8)
Polk County No 178.5 (162.0, 196.2) 21 (5, 30) 89 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Tillamook County No 187.1 (162.2, 215.5) 12 (1, 30) 44 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Umatilla County No 185.2 (167.2, 204.7) 13 (2, 29) 80 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Union County No 183.7 (156.0, 215.2) 16 (1, 32) 33 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Wallowa County Yes 122.1 (89.0, 169.9) 34 (19, 34) 9 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.8)
Wasco County No 188.7 (161.3, 220.0) 11 (1, 31) 36 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Washington County No 145.0 (138.4, 151.9) 32 (28, 34) 382 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Wheeler County No 217.3 (127.0, 399.2) 1 (1, 34) 4
*
*
Yamhill County No 170.9 (156.5, 186.4) 25 (10, 31) 108 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Gilliam County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2022 5:10 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top