Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oregon by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oregon No 132.6 (130.7, 134.5) N/A 3,866 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.4)
United States No 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) N/A 283,896 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Grant County Yes 95.6 (66.1, 139.9) 33 (12, 33) 7 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.6)
Morrow County Yes 105.0 (73.7, 146.1) 32 (6, 33) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Benton County Yes 105.2 (93.3, 118.3) 31 (24, 33) 61 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Deschutes County Yes 111.8 (103.9, 120.3) 30 (23, 33) 157 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.3)
Harney County Yes 113.4 (78.5, 162.4) 29 (3, 33) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.3)
Washington County Yes 113.4 (108.3, 118.6) 28 (24, 32) 394 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Wallowa County Yes 116.2 (78.6, 169.5) 27 (2, 33) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Hood River County Yes 116.6 (93.1, 144.6) 26 (8, 33) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Yamhill County No 123.9 (112.5, 136.2) 25 (14, 31) 93 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.5, -1.8)
Polk County No 126.7 (113.7, 140.9) 24 (12, 31) 74 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Union County No 129.3 (106.7, 155.8) 23 (4, 33) 26 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -1.0)
Clackamas County No 130.3 (124.4, 136.4) 22 (14, 27) 392 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Jackson County No 132.0 (124.4, 140.1) 21 (13, 27) 244 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Multnomah County No 132.3 (127.5, 137.2) 20 (13, 26) 606 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.5)
Lane County No 132.9 (126.7, 139.3) 19 (13, 26) 375 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Crook County No 134.1 (110.4, 162.1) 18 (3, 32) 26 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Marion County No 135.7 (128.8, 142.9) 17 (11, 25) 303 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Baker County No 137.1 (111.0, 169.3) 16 (2, 32) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Jefferson County No 138.3 (113.0, 168.1) 15 (2, 32) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Columbia County No 142.7 (125.9, 161.3) 14 (3, 27) 55 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Umatilla County No 143.0 (127.7, 159.8) 13 (4, 27) 67 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Linn County No 150.2 (138.8, 162.3) 12 (3, 19) 137 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Wasco County No 150.3 (126.4, 178.0) 11 (1, 27) 30 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Josephine County No 153.3 (140.9, 166.8) 10 (2, 18) 129 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Douglas County No 154.4 (143.2, 166.3) 9 (2, 17) 161 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Clatsop County No 155.1 (135.7, 176.9) 8 (1, 24) 51 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Lincoln County No 155.3 (138.5, 174.1) 7 (1, 22) 75 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Coos County No 159.5 (144.7, 175.7) 6 (1, 17) 97 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Lake County No 162.9 (118.5, 221.6) 5 (1, 32) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Malheur County No 165.9 (139.7, 195.7) 4 (1, 24) 31 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Klamath County No 166.5 (150.3, 184.2) 3 (1, 14) 85 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Tillamook County No 175.4 (149.8, 204.9) 2 (1, 17) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Curry County No 180.3 (156.3, 208.6) 1 (1, 13) 48 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Gilliam County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/21/2024 12:48 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top