Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oregon by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oregon No 154.1 (152.5, 155.7) N/A 7,485 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
United States 6 No 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) N/A 464,265 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Klamath County No 189.1 (176.1, 203.1) 1 (1, 13) 169 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Coos County No 185.7 (173.6, 198.6) 2 (1, 14) 200 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Curry County No 184.6 (166.5, 205.2) 3 (1, 19) 91 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Tillamook County No 184.2 (165.4, 205.1) 4 (1, 19) 81 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Josephine County No 182.6 (172.4, 193.3) 5 (1, 14) 273 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Douglas County No 180.9 (172.0, 190.4) 6 (1, 14) 340 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.5)
Malheur County No 178.9 (157.5, 202.7) 7 (1, 26) 54 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.1, 2.9)
Linn County No 176.9 (167.6, 186.7) 8 (1, 16) 287 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.4)
Lincoln County No 173.3 (159.6, 188.2) 9 (1, 22) 147 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Umatilla County No 172.1 (158.9, 186.2) 10 (1, 21) 133 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Wasco County No 171.5 (152.0, 193.4) 11 (1, 28) 61 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Clatsop County No 171.2 (155.6, 188.2) 12 (1, 24) 97 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Columbia County No 168.3 (154.7, 183.0) 13 (2, 25) 119 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Lake County No 163.6 (132.6, 201.7) 14 (1, 35) 22 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Crook County No 163.1 (144.4, 184.0) 15 (2, 30) 63 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Marion County No 160.2 (154.2, 166.4) 16 (11, 23) 568 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Baker County No 159.4 (138.9, 183.1) 17 (2, 31) 46 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Union County No 158.3 (139.7, 178.9) 18 (3, 32) 59 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Lane County No 156.3 (151.2, 161.6) 19 (13, 26) 764 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Jefferson County No 156.3 (135.0, 180.8) 20 (2, 33) 43 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Polk County No 151.4 (140.5, 163.1) 21 (12, 30) 153 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Multnomah County No 151.4 (147.2, 155.7) 22 (16, 28) 1,042 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.8, -1.9)
Jackson County No 151.1 (144.8, 157.5) 23 (15, 29) 485 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.3, -0.7)
Grant County No 150.6 (120.8, 187.9) 24 (1, 36) 21 stable stable trend 12.0 (-6.7, 34.5)
Clackamas County No 149.1 (144.2, 154.1) 25 (18, 30) 753 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Yamhill County No 147.7 (138.2, 157.8) 26 (15, 31) 187 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Harney County No 140.3 (110.9, 177.0) 27 (2, 36) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.9)
Morrow County No 135.8 (107.8, 170.7) 28 (7, 36) 17 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Hood River County No 135.4 (114.9, 159.1) 29 (14, 36) 33 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Wheeler County No 134.8 (86.0, 238.9) 30 (1, 36) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.2)
Benton County No 132.0 (121.9, 142.9) 31 (25, 35) 133 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Washington County No 130.7 (126.3, 135.3) 32 (27, 35) 676 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Deschutes County No 128.2 (121.8, 134.9) 33 (27, 36) 322 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Wallowa County Yes 122.3 (95.7, 156.7) 34 (14, 36) 17 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Sherman County Yes 113.4 (61.9, 202.2) 35 (1, 36) 3 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -0.8)
Gilliam County Yes 100.9 (60.9, 175.0) 36 (10, 36) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/24/2024 9:18 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top