Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oregon by County

Esophagus, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oregon N/A *** 4.4 (4.2, 4.7) N/A 252 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.6, -0.3)
United States N/A *** 3.7 (3.7, 3.8) N/A 15,762 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.8)
Multnomah County Urban *** 3.8 (3.2, 4.4) 15 (9, 19) 34 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Lane County Urban *** 4.8 (4.0, 5.7) 10 (4, 16) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.3)
Clackamas County Urban *** 4.1 (3.4, 4.9) 14 (7, 18) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.9)
Washington County Urban *** 3.3 (2.7, 4.0) 17 (12, 20) 22 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.2)
Marion County Urban *** 5.0 (4.1, 6.1) 8 (3, 15) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.9)
Jackson County Urban *** 5.7 (4.6, 7.0) 4 (1, 12) 20 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.7, 2.9)
Douglas County Rural *** 7.1 (5.5, 9.2) 2 (1, 9) 14 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.0, 3.8)
Deschutes County Urban *** 3.7 (2.7, 4.9) 16 (7, 20) 11 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.5)
Linn County Urban *** 5.3 (3.9, 7.1) 7 (1, 17) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 2.1)
Josephine County Urban *** 4.6 (3.2, 6.6) 12 (2, 20) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.7)
Klamath County Rural *** 6.3 (4.2, 9.2) 3 (1, 17) 6
*
*
Polk County Urban *** 4.7 (3.1, 7.0) 11 (2, 20) 5
*
*
Umatilla County Rural *** 5.6 (3.6, 8.3) 5 (1, 19) 5
*
*
Lincoln County Rural *** 4.3 (2.7, 7.0) 13 (2, 20) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.5)
Coos County Rural *** 3.3 (2.0, 5.4) 18 (6, 20) 4 falling falling trend -13.4 (-39.5, -3.5)
Yamhill County Urban *** 2.9 (1.8, 4.6) 19 (9, 20) 4
*
*
Clatsop County Rural *** 5.5 (3.1, 9.3) 6 (1, 20) 4
*
*
Tillamook County Rural *** 8.6 (4.9, 14.4) 1 (1, 16) 4
*
*
Benton County Urban *** 2.9 (1.7, 4.8) 20 (8, 20) 3
*
*
Curry County Rural *** 4.8 (2.7, 9.7) 9 (1, 20) 3
*
*
Baker County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Columbia County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crook County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilliam County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harney County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hood River County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Malheur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrow County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wallowa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wasco County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/12/2024 12:04 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top