Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

Liver & Bile Duct, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Pennsylvania *** 6.3 (6.2, 6.5) N/A 1,143 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.1, 4.9)
United States *** 6.6 (6.6, 6.7) N/A 27,015 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Adams County *** 5.2 (3.6, 7.2) 42 (5, 52) 8
*
*
Allegheny County *** 6.7 (6.1, 7.3) 14 (6, 30) 116 rising rising trend 2.5 (2.0, 2.9)
Armstrong County *** 4.6 (2.9, 7.2) 49 (5, 52) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 2.9)
Beaver County *** 6.1 (4.9, 7.6) 25 (4, 49) 18 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.6, 4.8)
Bedford County *** 7.6 (5.1, 11.2) 5 (1, 49) 6
*
*
Berks County *** 6.3 (5.4, 7.3) 23 (5, 43) 36 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.9, 4.4)
Blair County *** 5.6 (4.2, 7.4) 31 (5, 51) 11 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.5, 4.2)
Bradford County *** 5.1 (3.3, 7.8) 43 (3, 52) 5
*
*
Bucks County *** 5.5 (4.8, 6.2) 33 (16, 48) 50 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.9, 2.5)
Butler County *** 6.6 (5.3, 8.2) 15 (3, 46) 18 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.1, 4.1)
Cambria County *** 7.2 (5.6, 9.1) 9 (1, 44) 15 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.2, 3.9)
Carbon County *** 6.5 (4.3, 9.4) 20 (1, 52) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.8, 3.8)
Centre County *** 3.7 (2.6, 5.3) 52 (25, 52) 7
*
*
Chester County *** 5.0 (4.3, 5.9) 46 (19, 51) 34 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.3, 2.7)
Clearfield County *** 7.3 (5.2, 10.0) 8 (1, 49) 9
*
*
Columbia County *** 5.8 (3.8, 8.6) 28 (2, 52) 5
*
*
Crawford County *** 4.0 (2.6, 6.1) 50 (15, 52) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 2.5)
Cumberland County *** 5.2 (4.2, 6.5) 37 (11, 51) 19 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.7, 3.7)
Dauphin County *** 7.4 (6.1, 8.8) 6 (2, 35) 26 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.6, 3.7)
Delaware County *** 6.5 (5.7, 7.4) 16 (5, 38) 49 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.3, 3.0)
Elk County *** 8.7 (5.2, 14.1) 2 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Erie County *** 5.1 (4.1, 6.2) 45 (15, 52) 20 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.9, 3.1)
Fayette County *** 5.8 (4.4, 7.5) 29 (4, 51) 13 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.5, 4.2)
Franklin County *** 4.9 (3.7, 6.4) 47 (12, 52) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 2.5)
Huntingdon County *** 5.4 (3.2, 8.8) 35 (2, 52) 4
*
*
Indiana County *** 5.8 (4.1, 8.2) 27 (3, 52) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.7)
Jefferson County *** 5.2 (3.0, 8.6) 41 (2, 52) 4
*
*
Lackawanna County *** 5.8 (4.6, 7.1) 30 (6, 49) 19 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.3, 3.5)
Lancaster County *** 5.2 (4.5, 6.0) 38 (18, 50) 38 rising rising trend 3.1 (2.2, 4.1)
Lawrence County *** 6.5 (4.7, 8.9) 17 (1, 50) 9 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.2, 4.5)
Lebanon County *** 5.2 (3.9, 6.9) 39 (7, 52) 11 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.5)
Lehigh County *** 6.8 (5.8, 8.0) 13 (3, 38) 32 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.3, 3.7)
Luzerne County *** 5.3 (4.3, 6.3) 36 (13, 51) 25 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.5, 2.5)
Lycoming County *** 8.1 (6.2, 10.4) 3 (1, 39) 13
*
*
McKean County *** 7.1 (4.4, 11.0) 10 (1, 52) 4
*
*
Mercer County *** 6.5 (5.0, 8.5) 18 (2, 49) 12 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.3, 4.0)
Monroe County *** 5.6 (4.3, 7.1) 32 (6, 51) 14 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.8, 4.5)
Montgomery County *** 6.2 (5.5, 6.9) 24 (8, 39) 69 rising rising trend 3.0 (2.5, 3.6)
Northampton County *** 7.6 (6.5, 9.0) 4 (2, 27) 34 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.7, 3.7)
Northumberland County *** 5.1 (3.5, 7.2) 44 (5, 52) 7
*
*
Perry County *** 6.9 (4.2, 10.7) 12 (1, 52) 4
*
*
Philadelphia County *** 9.9 (9.2, 10.6) 1 (1, 5) 175 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.7)
Pike County *** 4.7 (3.0, 7.5) 48 (5, 52) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.5)
Schuylkill County *** 7.0 (5.6, 8.9) 11 (2, 44) 16 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.8, 3.5)
Somerset County *** 6.4 (4.5, 9.0) 21 (2, 51) 8 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.9, 4.4)
Susquehanna County *** 6.5 (4.2, 10.0) 19 (1, 52) 5
*
*
Venango County *** 5.2 (3.3, 8.1) 40 (3, 52) 5 rising rising trend 4.1 (2.1, 6.1)
Warren County *** 7.4 (4.7, 11.3) 7 (1, 51) 5
*
*
Washington County *** 5.9 (4.8, 7.3) 26 (5, 49) 20 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.4, 3.7)
Wayne County *** 4.0 (2.3, 6.7) 51 (10, 52) 4
*
*
Westmoreland County *** 6.3 (5.4, 7.3) 22 (6, 43) 38 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.2, 3.5)
York County *** 5.5 (4.6, 6.4) 34 (14, 49) 33 rising rising trend 3.9 (2.5, 5.4)
Cameron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Juniata County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mifflin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montour County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Potter County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Snyder County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tioga County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyoming County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2021 11:44 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top