Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

Bladder, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Pennsylvania N/A *** 4.5 (4.4, 4.6) N/A 840 falling falling trend -1.2 (-3.6, -0.2)
United States N/A *** 4.1 (4.1, 4.1) N/A 16,859 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.7)
Lycoming County Urban *** 3.3 (2.2, 4.9) 51 (15, 51) 6 falling falling trend -12.8 (-33.6, -2.1)
Cumberland County Urban *** 3.5 (2.7, 4.4) 50 (23, 51) 13 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Chester County Urban *** 3.6 (3.0, 4.3) 49 (26, 51) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Blair County Urban *** 3.6 (2.5, 5.1) 48 (12, 51) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-27.5, 0.1)
Montgomery County Urban *** 3.7 (3.2, 4.2) 47 (30, 51) 46 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.4)
Armstrong County Urban *** 3.9 (2.5, 6.2) 46 (5, 51) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.2)
Philadelphia County Urban *** 4.0 (3.6, 4.5) 45 (24, 49) 69 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Lancaster County Urban *** 4.0 (3.4, 4.7) 44 (20, 50) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Lebanon County Urban *** 4.1 (3.0, 5.6) 43 (8, 51) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-11.9, 0.4)
Centre County Urban *** 4.1 (2.9, 5.7) 42 (6, 51) 7
*
*
Somerset County Rural *** 4.1 (2.7, 6.2) 41 (5, 51) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.5)
Berks County Urban *** 4.2 (3.5, 5.0) 40 (14, 50) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Venango County Rural *** 4.2 (2.4, 7.2) 39 (2, 51) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Butler County Urban *** 4.3 (3.3, 5.5) 38 (9, 51) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.3)
Fayette County Urban *** 4.3 (3.1, 5.8) 37 (6, 51) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Wayne County Rural *** 4.3 (2.6, 7.2) 36 (3, 51) 4
*
*
Allegheny County Urban *** 4.3 (3.9, 4.8) 35 (18, 46) 82 falling falling trend -0.9 (-4.4, -0.2)
Clearfield County Rural *** 4.3 (2.9, 6.5) 34 (4, 51) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.9)
York County Urban *** 4.4 (3.6, 5.2) 33 (13, 49) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Bradford County Rural *** 4.4 (2.8, 6.9) 32 (3, 51) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 2.3)
Adams County Urban *** 4.4 (3.1, 6.3) 31 (4, 51) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.5)
Lehigh County Urban *** 4.4 (3.6, 5.4) 30 (10, 50) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Delaware County Urban *** 4.5 (3.8, 5.2) 29 (13, 48) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.6, 0.0)
Dauphin County Urban *** 4.5 (3.5, 5.6) 28 (9, 50) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Cambria County Urban *** 4.5 (3.3, 6.0) 27 (5, 51) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Bucks County Urban *** 4.6 (4.0, 5.3) 26 (11, 45) 44 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Bedford County Rural *** 4.7 (2.7, 7.9) 25 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Schuylkill County Rural *** 4.8 (3.6, 6.3) 24 (4, 51) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.7)
Luzerne County Urban *** 4.8 (4.0, 5.8) 23 (7, 47) 24 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.8, 5.9)
Lackawanna County Urban *** 5.0 (4.0, 6.2) 22 (5, 48) 17 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 1.9)
Crawford County Rural *** 5.0 (3.4, 7.2) 21 (2, 51) 7
*
*
Beaver County Urban *** 5.0 (3.9, 6.4) 20 (4, 49) 14 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.0)
Carbon County Urban *** 5.1 (3.3, 7.6) 19 (2, 51) 5
*
*
Washington County Urban *** 5.1 (4.0, 6.4) 18 (4, 47) 17 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Indiana County Rural *** 5.2 (3.5, 7.5) 17 (2, 51) 6
*
*
Northampton County Urban *** 5.3 (4.4, 6.4) 16 (4, 40) 26 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Northumberland County Rural *** 5.4 (3.8, 7.4) 15 (2, 50) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.2)
Franklin County Urban *** 5.5 (4.2, 7.0) 14 (2, 46) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.9)
Mifflin County Rural *** 5.5 (3.5, 8.7) 13 (1, 51) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.5)
Mercer County Rural *** 5.7 (4.3, 7.6) 12 (2, 45) 11 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.2, 2.7)
Westmoreland County Urban *** 5.8 (5.0, 6.7) 11 (3, 30) 37 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.3, 10.4)
Tioga County Rural *** 5.9 (3.6, 9.4) 10 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Erie County Urban *** 6.0 (4.9, 7.2) 9 (2, 32) 23 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.7)
Monroe County Rural *** 6.0 (4.6, 7.7) 8 (1, 42) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.6)
Lawrence County Urban *** 6.1 (4.5, 8.4) 7 (1, 46) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.1, 3.0)
Columbia County Rural *** 6.4 (4.3, 9.3) 6 (1, 50) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.1)
Clarion County Rural *** 6.5 (3.8, 10.6) 5 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Susquehanna County Rural *** 6.7 (4.2, 10.6) 4 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Greene County Rural *** 6.8 (3.9, 11.2) 3 (1, 51) 3
*
*
Jefferson County Rural *** 8.1 (5.5, 11.9) 2 (1, 38) 6 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.2, 4.0)
Juniata County Rural *** 9.0 (5.0, 15.4) 1 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Cameron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Elk County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huntingdon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McKean County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montour County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Potter County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Snyder County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyoming County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/06/2024 12:04 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top