Death Rates Table
County![]() |
Met Healthy People Objective of ***? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) ![]() |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) ![]() |
Average Annual Count![]() |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) ![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
South Carolina | *** | 161.5 (160.1, 163.0) | N/A | 10,303 |
falling ![]() |
-1.6 (-1.7, -1.5) |
United States | *** | 152.4 (152.3, 152.6) | N/A | 598,381 |
falling ![]() |
-2.1 (-2.3, -1.8) |
Beaufort County | *** | 123.8 (118.0, 129.8) | 46 (44, 46) | 396 |
falling ![]() |
-1.8 (-2.1, -1.5) |
Edgefield County | *** | 137.1 (120.3, 155.8) | 45 (27, 46) | 51 |
falling ![]() |
-2.1 (-2.8, -1.4) |
Jasper County | *** | 139.8 (122.6, 158.8) | 44 (25, 46) | 53 |
falling ![]() |
-1.3 (-2.2, -0.4) |
Greenville County | *** | 147.6 (143.2, 152.2) | 43 (36, 45) | 874 |
falling ![]() |
-3.2 (-4.5, -1.8) |
Lancaster County | *** | 147.7 (138.3, 157.6) | 42 (30, 45) | 195 |
falling ![]() |
-1.3 (-1.8, -0.9) |
Charleston County | *** | 152.6 (147.5, 157.8) | 41 (31, 44) | 730 |
falling ![]() |
-2.6 (-3.4, -1.8) |
Lexington County | *** | 153.9 (148.0, 160.0) | 40 (28, 44) | 528 |
falling ![]() |
-1.4 (-1.7, -1.2) |
Saluda County | *** | 155.3 (135.8, 177.1) | 39 (10, 45) | 47 |
falling ![]() |
-1.5 (-2.1, -0.8) |
York County | *** | 156.3 (149.8, 163.1) | 38 (25, 43) | 447 |
falling ![]() |
-2.7 (-3.6, -1.9) |
Georgetown County | *** | 156.6 (145.6, 168.3) | 37 (20, 45) | 171 |
falling ![]() |
-1.3 (-1.7, -0.9) |
Dorchester County | *** | 157.0 (148.3, 166.1) | 36 (22, 44) | 258 |
falling ![]() |
-1.6 (-1.9, -1.2) |
Oconee County | *** | 157.3 (147.0, 168.1) | 35 (19, 44) | 190 |
falling ![]() |
-1.1 (-1.5, -0.8) |
Pickens County | *** | 158.3 (149.2, 167.7) | 34 (20, 44) | 239 |
falling ![]() |
-0.9 (-1.2, -0.7) |
McCormick County | *** | 159.3 (133.7, 190.4) | 33 (3, 46) | 33 |
falling ![]() |
-2.0 (-2.6, -1.3) |
Clarendon County | *** | 160.2 (144.6, 177.2) | 32 (12, 45) | 85 |
falling ![]() |
-3.4 (-5.2, -1.6) |
Berkeley County | *** | 161.2 (153.5, 169.2) | 31 (19, 41) | 354 |
falling ![]() |
-1.7 (-1.9, -1.4) |
Aiken County | *** | 162.7 (155.2, 170.5) | 30 (18, 40) | 376 |
falling ![]() |
-1.6 (-2.0, -1.2) |
Florence County | *** | 163.8 (155.1, 172.9) | 29 (16, 41) | 278 |
falling ![]() |
-1.4 (-1.7, -1.1) |
Anderson County | *** | 165.4 (158.4, 172.7) | 28 (17, 38) | 436 |
falling ![]() |
-1.4 (-2.4, -0.4) |
Horry County | *** | 166.7 (161.4, 172.1) | 27 (18, 36) | 845 |
falling ![]() |
-1.1 (-1.3, -0.8) |
Richland County | *** | 167.3 (161.5, 173.3) | 26 (17, 35) | 665 |
falling ![]() |
-1.3 (-1.6, -1.1) |
Calhoun County | *** | 168.6 (145.3, 195.3) | 25 (2, 45) | 40 |
stable ![]() |
-0.6 (-1.5, 0.4) |
Spartanburg County | *** | 170.3 (164.4, 176.5) | 24 (14, 33) | 634 |
falling ![]() |
-1.7 (-2.2, -1.1) |
Marion County | *** | 172.2 (154.6, 191.5) | 23 (4, 43) | 76 |
falling ![]() |
-1.3 (-1.8, -0.8) |
Chesterfield County | *** | 173.1 (158.4, 188.9) | 22 (5, 40) | 107 |
falling ![]() |
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.6) |
Fairfield County | *** | 175.4 (155.2, 197.9) | 21 (2, 43) | 59 |
falling ![]() |
-1.2 (-1.9, -0.6) |
Allendale County | *** | 177.5 (144.6, 216.4) | 20 (1, 45) | 22 |
falling ![]() |
-1.4 (-2.3, -0.5) |
Abbeville County | *** | 177.9 (158.6, 199.1) | 19 (2, 41) | 66 |
falling ![]() |
-0.6 (-1.2, -0.1) |
Greenwood County | *** | 178.2 (166.2, 190.9) | 18 (5, 33) | 171 |
falling ![]() |
-1.1 (-1.4, -0.8) |
Newberry County | *** | 178.6 (162.5, 196.0) | 17 (3, 37) | 95 |
falling ![]() |
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.4) |
Dillon County | *** | 179.7 (160.8, 200.5) | 16 (2, 41) | 69 |
falling ![]() |
-1.2 (-1.9, -0.6) |
Orangeburg County | *** | 180.3 (169.4, 191.8) | 15 (4, 30) | 219 |
falling ![]() |
-0.9 (-1.2, -0.7) |
Darlington County | *** | 180.6 (168.1, 193.9) | 14 (4, 32) | 163 |
falling ![]() |
-1.1 (-1.3, -0.8) |
Kershaw County | *** | 180.8 (168.1, 194.3) | 13 (4, 31) | 157 |
falling ![]() |
-1.1 (-1.4, -0.7) |
Cherokee County | *** | 181.1 (167.0, 196.1) | 12 (2, 33) | 128 |
falling ![]() |
-1.9 (-2.7, -1.1) |
Sumter County | *** | 182.0 (171.5, 192.9) | 11 (4, 27) | 235 |
falling ![]() |
-1.6 (-2.2, -1.0) |
Bamberg County | *** | 186.7 (160.4, 216.6) | 10 (1, 41) | 40 |
falling ![]() |
-1.0 (-1.7, -0.2) |
Williamsburg County | *** | 188.2 (170.2, 207.9) | 9 (1, 32) | 85 |
stable ![]() |
-0.5 (-1.1, 0.1) |
Union County | *** | 192.8 (173.5, 213.8) | 8 (1, 30) | 78 |
falling ![]() |
-0.5 (-1.0, -0.1) |
Barnwell County | *** | 195.4 (172.6, 220.5) | 7 (1, 31) | 57 |
stable ![]() |
-0.4 (-0.9, 0.0) |
Laurens County | *** | 195.5 (182.6, 209.2) | 6 (1, 19) | 178 |
stable ![]() |
-0.4 (-0.8, 0.0) |
Chester County | *** | 197.3 (179.1, 217.1) | 5 (1, 24) | 89 |
falling ![]() |
-0.6 (-1.0, -0.2) |
Colleton County | *** | 198.4 (181.4, 216.6) | 4 (1, 22) | 107 |
stable ![]() |
-0.4 (-0.9, 0.1) |
Lee County | *** | 201.2 (175.7, 229.6) | 3 (1, 31) | 48 |
falling ![]() |
-4.2 (-8.0, -0.2) |
Hampton County | *** | 203.8 (179.5, 230.7) | 2 (1, 26) | 53 |
stable ![]() |
-0.4 (-1.1, 0.3) |
Marlboro County | *** | 208.0 (186.7, 231.3) | 1 (1, 21) | 73 |
falling ![]() |
-1.0 (-1.7, -0.3) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/29/2022 8:49 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/29/2022 8:49 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.