Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for South Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
South Carolina N/A No 154.9 (153.3, 156.5) N/A 7,832 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
United States 6 N/A No 151.3 (151.1, 151.5) N/A 463,400 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Saluda County Urban No 167.5 (143.1, 196.1) 23 (4, 44) 36 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.1, 14.3)
Hampton County Rural No 224.1 (188.0, 266.5) 2 (1, 23) 29 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.9)
Colleton County Rural No 211.8 (189.9, 236.0) 3 (1, 18) 74 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Laurens County Urban No 190.2 (175.6, 205.9) 12 (2, 24) 134 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Williamsburg County Rural No 183.3 (154.9, 216.6) 16 (1, 42) 33 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Abbeville County Rural No 172.2 (150.3, 197.0) 22 (4, 42) 48 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.6)
Barnwell County Rural No 195.6 (165.8, 229.9) 8 (1, 37) 34 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Chester County Urban No 195.8 (173.4, 220.7) 7 (1, 27) 58 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Dillon County Rural No 209.3 (180.7, 241.7) 4 (1, 25) 42 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Marion County Rural No 201.6 (173.4, 234.1) 5 (1, 30) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Calhoun County Urban No 138.0 (112.0, 170.2) 44 (16, 46) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.8)
Chesterfield County Rural No 194.6 (175.4, 215.6) 9 (1, 24) 80 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Orangeburg County Rural No 183.9 (166.4, 203.1) 15 (3, 31) 94 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Bamberg County Rural No 193.0 (153.2, 242.9) 10 (1, 43) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Sumter County Urban No 181.1 (166.8, 196.4) 17 (5, 28) 124 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Union County Urban No 180.3 (158.1, 205.3) 19 (2, 39) 52 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Fairfield County Urban No 191.6 (157.7, 232.4) 11 (1, 41) 29 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Newberry County Rural No 173.7 (154.7, 194.9) 21 (5, 40) 68 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Allendale County Rural No 229.5 (159.7, 333.1) 1 (1, 45) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.8)
Darlington County Urban No 189.4 (172.7, 207.5) 13 (2, 26) 101 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Georgetown County Rural No 150.4 (138.1, 163.9) 38 (21, 44) 139 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Horry County Urban No 164.3 (158.9, 169.7) 25 (19, 33) 847 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Kershaw County Urban No 180.8 (166.3, 196.3) 18 (4, 29) 122 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Pickens County Urban No 152.0 (143.2, 161.3) 37 (23, 43) 231 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Spartanburg County Urban No 165.4 (159.0, 172.1) 24 (18, 33) 525 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Greenwood County Rural No 164.2 (150.5, 179.0) 26 (12, 41) 116 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Oconee County Rural No 149.8 (139.3, 160.9) 39 (23, 44) 173 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Anderson County Urban No 158.8 (151.5, 166.5) 28 (20, 40) 367 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.0, 1.4)
Florence County Urban No 158.2 (147.6, 169.5) 29 (18, 42) 172 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Lancaster County Urban No 143.9 (134.0, 154.4) 40 (28, 45) 170 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Lexington County Urban No 158.1 (151.8, 164.6) 30 (21, 39) 497 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
Marlboro County Rural No 197.3 (168.5, 230.8) 6 (1, 34) 36 falling falling trend -1.1 (-8.4, -0.2)
Richland County Urban No 152.7 (145.4, 160.3) 36 (24, 42) 342 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Aiken County Urban No 154.4 (146.3, 163.0) 33 (22, 42) 294 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Cherokee County Rural No 187.3 (171.5, 204.4) 14 (3, 25) 109 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.5, -0.4)
Dorchester County Urban No 155.8 (146.2, 165.9) 31 (20, 42) 204 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Clarendon County Rural No 174.3 (152.0, 199.8) 20 (4, 41) 52 falling falling trend -1.4 (-9.5, -0.4)
Beaufort County Urban Yes 120.3 (114.0, 126.9) 46 (44, 46) 348 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Berkeley County Urban No 154.9 (146.5, 163.7) 32 (22, 42) 273 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Edgefield County Urban No 140.8 (120.0, 164.9) 42 (19, 46) 35 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.0)
York County Urban No 154.4 (147.5, 161.6) 34 (23, 41) 389 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -1.3)
Charleston County Urban No 130.9 (125.6, 136.3) 45 (41, 46) 487 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -1.6)
McCormick County Rural No 154.3 (116.9, 208.4) 35 (2, 46) 21 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.8)
Greenville County Urban No 138.5 (133.9, 143.3) 43 (38, 45) 708 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.8, -1.4)
Jasper County Urban No 143.6 (121.6, 169.7) 41 (16, 46) 37 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -1.5)
Lee County Rural No 161.8 (126.5, 206.3) 27 (2, 46) 16 falling falling trend -4.3 (-18.0, -0.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2024 12:19 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top