Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for South Carolina by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina N/A No 37.5 (36.8, 38.1) N/A 2,645 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.6, -3.5)
United States N/A No 32.4 (32.3, 32.5) N/A 136,831 falling falling trend -4.3 (-4.4, -4.1)
Marlboro County Rural No 63.7 (52.4, 76.9) 1 (1, 14) 23 falling falling trend -2.1 (-10.2, -0.7)
Chester County Urban No 63.6 (53.5, 75.4) 2 (1, 12) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Dillon County Rural No 60.1 (49.3, 72.8) 3 (1, 17) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Colleton County Rural No 57.0 (48.4, 66.8) 4 (1, 17) 33 falling falling trend -2.5 (-9.4, -0.9)
Chesterfield County Rural No 53.1 (45.2, 62.1) 5 (1, 21) 33 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Kershaw County Urban No 52.0 (45.5, 59.2) 6 (1, 20) 49 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Union County Urban No 51.6 (42.4, 62.6) 7 (1, 29) 23 falling falling trend -15.9 (-25.9, -0.5)
Abbeville County Rural No 50.6 (40.8, 62.4) 8 (1, 35) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Cherokee County Rural No 50.5 (43.4, 58.4) 9 (2, 25) 38 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -1.3)
Laurens County Urban No 50.2 (44.0, 57.2) 10 (2, 21) 49 falling falling trend -8.6 (-15.9, -1.0)
Hampton County Rural No 49.2 (38.0, 63.2) 11 (1, 41) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.6)
Marion County Rural No 48.6 (39.5, 59.3) 12 (1, 36) 21 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.1)
Clarendon County Rural No 46.9 (38.6, 56.8) 13 (2, 37) 25 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Darlington County Urban No 46.8 (40.5, 53.8) 14 (4, 32) 42 falling falling trend -2.7 (-9.5, -1.7)
Lee County Rural No 45.6 (34.0, 60.5) 15 (1, 45) 11 falling falling trend -3.4 (-10.2, -1.6)
Sumter County Urban No 44.1 (39.2, 49.6) 16 (7, 33) 60 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Bamberg County Rural No 43.3 (31.3, 59.4) 17 (1, 46) 9 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.1)
Williamsburg County Rural No 42.4 (34.6, 51.9) 18 (4, 43) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Newberry County Rural No 42.4 (35.1, 51.0) 19 (5, 42) 24 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Anderson County Urban No 41.1 (37.7, 44.6) 20 (13, 35) 116 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.3, -1.5)
Barnwell County Rural No 41.0 (31.1, 53.4) 21 (4, 46) 12 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Fairfield County Urban No 40.4 (31.3, 51.8) 22 (5, 45) 15 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Florence County Urban No 40.2 (36.1, 44.6) 23 (13, 39) 73 falling falling trend -2.8 (-9.1, -1.8)
Lancaster County Urban No 40.0 (35.4, 45.0) 24 (12, 40) 59 falling falling trend -3.3 (-8.9, -1.9)
Allendale County Rural No 39.7 (24.7, 61.6) 25 (1, 46) 5 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.1, -0.6)
Spartanburg County Urban No 39.3 (36.6, 42.2) 26 (16, 37) 164 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.5, -2.8)
Lexington County Urban No 39.3 (36.5, 42.3) 27 (16, 37) 149 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.7)
Greenwood County Rural No 38.5 (33.2, 44.5) 28 (12, 43) 39 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Horry County Urban No 38.5 (36.2, 40.9) 29 (18, 37) 241 falling falling trend -6.0 (-9.4, -4.1)
Oconee County Rural No 37.7 (33.1, 42.9) 30 (15, 43) 51 falling falling trend -8.4 (-16.1, -1.7)
York County Urban No 37.5 (34.5, 40.7) 31 (18, 40) 121 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.2, -3.2)
Dorchester County Urban No 36.6 (32.7, 40.9) 32 (18, 43) 67 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Berkeley County Urban No 36.1 (32.7, 39.7) 33 (19, 42) 92 falling falling trend -7.2 (-11.3, -4.9)
McCormick County Rural No 35.8 (25.1, 53.0) 34 (5, 46) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.7)
Pickens County Urban No 35.6 (31.7, 40.0) 35 (19, 44) 61 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.7, -2.3)
Richland County Urban No 35.6 (33.1, 38.3) 36 (23, 42) 154 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.9, -2.6)
Georgetown County Rural No 35.4 (30.7, 40.9) 37 (17, 45) 45 falling falling trend -4.8 (-13.2, -2.2)
Aiken County Urban No 35.4 (32.2, 38.9) 38 (21, 43) 91 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.7, -2.2)
Calhoun County Urban No 34.1 (24.7, 47.0) 39 (9, 46) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.7)
Edgefield County Urban No 32.9 (25.0, 42.9) 40 (14, 46) 12 falling falling trend -4.2 (-9.2, -2.8)
Saluda County Urban No 32.5 (23.8, 43.9) 41 (10, 46) 10 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.2)
Orangeburg County Rural No 32.5 (28.0, 37.6) 42 (23, 46) 40 falling falling trend -4.1 (-13.4, -1.9)
Jasper County Urban No 30.4 (23.5, 39.0) 43 (18, 46) 15 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.2)
Charleston County Urban No 30.3 (28.2, 32.5) 44 (37, 45) 163 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.2, -3.4)
Greenville County Urban No 29.9 (28.0, 31.8) 45 (38, 46) 195 falling falling trend -5.7 (-7.3, -4.5)
Beaufort County Urban No 25.8 (23.5, 28.5) 46 (42, 46) 93 falling falling trend -3.8 (-8.3, -2.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/11/2024 4:03 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top