Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for South Carolina by County

Breast, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina N/A No 21.3 (20.6, 22.0) N/A 759 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
United States N/A No 19.3 (19.2, 19.4) N/A 42,308 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
Greenville County Urban No 20.6 (18.5, 22.9) 28 (14, 38) 71 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Horry County Urban No 20.6 (18.1, 23.3) 29 (13, 39) 59 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.7)
Richland County Urban No 24.0 (21.2, 27.0) 16 (6, 31) 56 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Charleston County Urban No 18.6 (16.4, 21.2) 36 (19, 41) 52 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Lexington County Urban No 22.1 (19.2, 25.3) 23 (9, 37) 44 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Spartanburg County Urban No 20.2 (17.5, 23.2) 31 (13, 40) 42 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.6)
York County Urban No 21.1 (18.1, 24.5) 26 (10, 40) 36 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Beaufort County Urban No 18.1 (15.0, 21.7) 38 (17, 42) 30 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.4, 3.3)
Anderson County Urban No 20.8 (17.5, 24.6) 27 (10, 40) 30 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Aiken County Urban No 21.8 (18.1, 26.1) 24 (7, 40) 28 stable stable trend -5.7 (-17.7, 1.2)
Berkeley County Urban No 18.2 (15.0, 21.9) 37 (16, 42) 23 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Florence County Urban No 23.7 (19.4, 28.7) 18 (5, 37) 23 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Dorchester County Urban No 18.8 (15.1, 23.2) 35 (12, 42) 19 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.6)
Lancaster County Urban No 22.5 (17.7, 28.2) 20 (5, 40) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Pickens County Urban No 19.5 (15.4, 24.5) 32 (10, 42) 17 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Orangeburg County Rural No 27.0 (21.0, 34.3) 8 (2, 36) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Sumter County Urban No 22.3 (17.5, 28.0) 22 (5, 41) 16 falling falling trend -19.6 (-34.8, -0.7)
Laurens County Urban No 26.4 (20.0, 34.5) 11 (2, 39) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Georgetown County Rural No 22.4 (16.3, 30.4) 21 (3, 42) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Darlington County Urban No 25.6 (19.4, 33.5) 12 (2, 40) 12 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Kershaw County Urban No 23.8 (17.8, 31.4) 17 (3, 41) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.5, 13.8)
Oconee County Rural No 18.9 (13.8, 25.5) 34 (8, 42) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Newberry County Rural No 36.0 (26.3, 48.6) 2 (1, 24) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.4)
Greenwood County Rural No 16.5 (11.8, 22.5) 40 (14, 42) 9 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.3, -1.7)
Colleton County Rural No 27.3 (19.1, 38.2) 7 (1, 40) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.5)
Clarendon County Rural No 26.5 (17.7, 38.8) 9 (1, 41) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 2.2)
Williamsburg County Rural No 24.8 (16.9, 36.1) 14 (1, 42) 7 falling falling trend -5.6 (-18.8, -0.7)
Cherokee County Rural No 16.1 (10.7, 23.4) 41 (11, 42) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.1)
Marlboro County Rural No 32.4 (21.1, 48.1) 4 (1, 40) 6
*
*
Chesterfield County Rural No 19.2 (12.4, 28.7) 33 (4, 42) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.7)
Jasper County Urban No 23.3 (14.8, 35.6) 19 (1, 42) 5
*
*
Edgefield County Urban No 25.6 (16.6, 39.0) 13 (1, 42) 5
*
*
Fairfield County Urban No 33.8 (21.0, 52.2) 3 (1, 41) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.9)
Dillon County Rural No 26.5 (16.4, 40.6) 10 (1, 42) 5 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.3)
Marion County Rural No 21.8 (13.0, 34.6) 25 (2, 42) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 0.9)
Hampton County Rural No 37.9 (22.6, 60.0) 1 (1, 40) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.4)
Saluda County Urban No 24.5 (14.9, 39.7) 15 (1, 42) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.4)
Abbeville County Rural No 20.2 (11.7, 33.3) 30 (3, 42) 4
*
*
Chester County Urban Yes 15.0 (9.0, 24.3) 42 (11, 42) 4
*
*
Union County Urban No 17.7 (10.3, 29.1) 39 (5, 42) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.5)
Bamberg County Rural No 31.3 (17.6, 53.6) 5 (1, 42) 3
*
*
McCormick County Rural No 29.6 (16.6, 60.0) 6 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Allendale County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Barnwell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top