Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for South Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Dakota No 153.0 (149.7, 156.4) N/A 1,702 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.8)
United States No 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) N/A 599,666 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Hanson County No 302.1 (213.4, 413.3) 1 (1, 24) 9 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.3, 3.5)
Mellette County No 265.8 (177.8, 383.4) 2 (1, 51) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.2)
Todd County No 258.3 (201.7, 324.6) 3 (1, 22) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Buffalo County No 230.9 (126.3, 381.4) 4 (1, 63) 3
*
*
Shannon County No 213.6 (168.5, 265.9) 5 (1, 38) 18 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Miner County No 210.4 (144.6, 300.6) 6 (1, 61) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Corson County No 207.1 (142.9, 289.3) 7 (1, 60) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Fall River County No 206.0 (169.9, 249.6) 8 (2, 37) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
McCook County No 204.0 (161.3, 255.9) 9 (1, 44) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.7)
Jackson County No 200.4 (139.3, 280.0) 10 (1, 60) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Dewey County No 196.6 (143.2, 262.7) 11 (1, 57) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Butte County No 193.6 (162.5, 229.5) 12 (3, 38) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Hamlin County No 188.7 (146.4, 240.0) 13 (2, 55) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Jones County No 188.0 (108.5, 326.7) 14 (1, 63) 3
*
*
Lyman County No 185.7 (133.8, 252.3) 15 (2, 60) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Aurora County No 181.5 (129.1, 251.8) 16 (2, 61) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Clay County No 179.1 (147.2, 216.0) 17 (4, 48) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Minnehaha County No 174.4 (165.9, 183.2) 18 (10, 30) 339 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.4)
Meade County No 171.1 (151.1, 193.2) 19 (8, 43) 56 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Deuel County No 168.5 (127.2, 221.4) 20 (3, 61) 12 stable stable trend -17.8 (-40.8, 14.3)
Bennett County No 165.3 (108.5, 241.1) 21 (2, 63) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.0)
Charles Mix County No 164.9 (133.3, 202.2) 22 (6, 56) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Union County No 163.1 (138.8, 190.8) 23 (8, 52) 34 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Clark County No 161.3 (117.1, 219.5) 24 (4, 62) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Perkins County No 159.4 (114.3, 221.5) 25 (3, 62) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.2)
Codington County No 157.3 (139.8, 176.6) 26 (12, 49) 61 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Haakon County No 156.3 (100.0, 240.8) 27 (2, 63) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 1.0)
Hughes County No 155.5 (132.9, 181.1) 28 (11, 56) 36 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Turner County No 154.0 (124.3, 189.6) 29 (8, 60) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Kingsbury County No 153.2 (118.1, 198.0) 30 (7, 62) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Gregory County No 152.9 (115.6, 201.8) 31 (6, 63) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Pennington County No 150.9 (141.7, 160.5) 32 (21, 46) 219 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Beadle County No 150.8 (129.1, 175.4) 33 (13, 56) 37 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Roberts County No 150.7 (122.7, 183.7) 34 (10, 60) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Stanley County No 146.5 (100.6, 209.4) 35 (5, 63) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.2)
Davison County No 146.4 (126.7, 168.6) 36 (15, 57) 43 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Day County No 146.3 (112.7, 189.1) 37 (8, 62) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Bon Homme County No 143.8 (113.1, 181.6) 38 (10, 62) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Faulk County No 143.1 (91.2, 218.3) 39 (3, 63) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.7)
Grant County No 142.9 (114.0, 178.3) 40 (12, 62) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Ziebach County No 141.8 (79.4, 231.8) 41 (3, 63) 3
*
*
Spink County No 139.9 (107.9, 179.7) 42 (10, 63) 15 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
McPherson County No 139.5 (91.4, 210.0) 43 (4, 63) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.7)
Hutchinson County No 139.2 (109.8, 175.2) 44 (12, 63) 19 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.3)
Hyde County No 138.6 (83.9, 232.9) 45 (3, 63) 4
*
*
Walworth County No 138.4 (106.7, 178.8) 46 (11, 63) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Custer County No 138.3 (113.7, 168.7) 47 (15, 62) 25 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Brown County No 138.2 (123.8, 154.0) 48 (24, 58) 72 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Tripp County No 136.3 (104.3, 177.0) 49 (11, 63) 14 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Moody County No 132.6 (99.9, 173.5) 50 (11, 63) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Brookings County No 130.9 (113.5, 150.3) 51 (25, 61) 42 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Lawrence County No 130.4 (114.1, 148.7) 52 (28, 61) 51 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Brule County No 128.6 (94.1, 173.1) 53 (12, 63) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Jerauld County No 124.6 (77.8, 197.7) 54 (7, 63) 5
*
*
Lake County Yes 122.6 (99.9, 149.5) 55 (25, 63) 23 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Marshall County Yes 121.1 (86.7, 166.2) 56 (15, 63) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.8)
Yankton County Yes 118.9 (102.7, 137.3) 57 (35, 63) 41 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Potter County Yes 117.5 (78.9, 179.0) 58 (11, 63) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Sanborn County Yes 115.2 (70.3, 182.6) 59 (10, 63) 4 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.1)
Lincoln County Yes 114.7 (102.5, 128.0) 60 (43, 63) 67 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.4)
Douglas County Yes 113.8 (73.8, 172.3) 61 (12, 63) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Edmunds County Yes 111.0 (76.1, 159.1) 62 (17, 63) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Hand County Yes 103.7 (67.6, 156.4) 63 (19, 63) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.7)
Campbell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harding County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sully County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2022 1:44 pm.

South Dakota County Name Change: please note that Shannon County, SD (FIPS code=46113) was renamed effective May 1, 2015, and the new name is Oglala Lakota County (FIPS Code=46102). Due to the nature of data submissions, we will use the older code/name this year and transition to the new code/name with a future data release.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top