Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for South Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Dakota N/A No 177.4 (172.1, 182.8) N/A 907 falling falling trend -1.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
United States N/A No 173.2 (173.0, 173.5) N/A 317,428 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.8)
Mellette County Rural No 317.8 (172.0, 536.0) 2 (1, 51) 3
*
*
Hanson County Rural No 392.1 (205.7, 652.9) 1 (1, 50) 4
*
*
Stanley County Rural No 164.2 (98.6, 264.8) 38 (4, 51) 4
*
*
Hand County Rural No 143.9 (82.2, 240.8) 47 (6, 51) 4 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.2, -0.1)
Jackson County Rural No 275.4 (166.1, 430.3) 6 (1, 51) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 3.5)
Aurora County Rural No 191.1 (117.8, 300.7) 20 (2, 51) 4
*
*
Brule County Rural No 131.4 (79.4, 206.2) 50 (10, 51) 4 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Faulk County Rural No 201.9 (123.5, 328.1) 17 (2, 51) 4
*
*
Miner County Rural No 237.9 (142.9, 381.5) 9 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Perkins County Rural No 167.4 (104.4, 266.7) 37 (4, 51) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.1)
Marshall County Rural No 136.6 (86.0, 210.3) 49 (10, 51) 5 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.2)
Dewey County Rural No 278.8 (174.3, 419.1) 5 (1, 49) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Edmunds County Rural No 159.8 (103.3, 242.2) 41 (6, 51) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.8)
Lyman County Rural No 226.2 (144.7, 338.5) 11 (1, 51) 5
*
*
Clark County Rural No 244.1 (156.6, 363.5) 7 (1, 50) 5
*
*
Deuel County Rural No 172.6 (113.9, 255.1) 31 (5, 51) 6 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.2, -0.2)
Gregory County Rural No 178.4 (115.9, 267.4) 25 (4, 51) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.5)
Moody County Rural No 154.4 (104.3, 222.0) 43 (8, 51) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Todd County Rural No 285.3 (188.7, 408.8) 4 (1, 47) 7
*
*
Tripp County Rural No 162.9 (110.9, 233.6) 39 (6, 51) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Spink County Rural No 153.5 (104.4, 219.8) 45 (8, 51) 7 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.2)
McCook County Urban No 225.2 (156.0, 315.1) 12 (2, 49) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.1)
Kingsbury County Rural No 175.0 (123.1, 245.8) 27 (6, 51) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Hamlin County Rural No 238.1 (167.3, 328.6) 8 (1, 46) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Walworth County Rural No 186.9 (132.9, 259.5) 21 (4, 51) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.4)
Day County Rural No 169.6 (120.9, 236.2) 36 (7, 51) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.1)
Bon Homme County Rural No 184.0 (135.5, 246.2) 22 (5, 51) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.5)
Charles Mix County Rural No 177.3 (130.3, 236.5) 26 (6, 51) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Turner County Urban No 157.7 (116.1, 211.3) 42 (10, 51) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Oglala Lakota County Rural No 310.3 (218.4, 423.4) 3 (1, 27) 11
*
*
Hutchinson County Rural No 192.9 (143.7, 255.7) 18 (5, 50) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.3)
Grant County Rural No 207.2 (154.7, 273.7) 15 (3, 48) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Clay County Rural No 204.1 (152.8, 266.5) 16 (3, 49) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Lake County Rural No 170.2 (127.3, 223.7) 33 (8, 51) 13 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Roberts County Rural No 191.3 (146.1, 246.9) 19 (5, 49) 13 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Custer County Urban No 172.2 (132.7, 224.4) 32 (8, 50) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.5)
Fall River County Rural No 234.6 (181.0, 303.4) 10 (2, 40) 15 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
Butte County Rural No 218.3 (170.4, 276.5) 13 (3, 43) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 1.1)
Union County Urban No 174.7 (138.7, 217.6) 29 (9, 49) 17 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Davison County Rural No 153.5 (123.9, 188.4) 44 (16, 51) 19 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.0)
Hughes County Rural No 179.9 (144.8, 221.3) 24 (8, 49) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Beadle County Rural No 170.0 (137.5, 208.2) 34 (11, 49) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Yankton County Rural No 138.3 (113.1, 167.9) 48 (26, 51) 22 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Brookings County Rural No 174.9 (146.2, 207.7) 28 (11, 48) 27 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Lawrence County Rural No 148.8 (123.9, 177.9) 46 (20, 51) 27 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Meade County Urban No 169.9 (141.7, 202.0) 35 (12, 48) 28 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.0)
Codington County Rural No 173.6 (146.7, 204.3) 30 (12, 47) 31 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Brown County Rural No 160.8 (137.5, 187.0) 40 (17, 49) 36 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Lincoln County Urban Yes 121.1 (103.8, 140.3) 51 (40, 51) 38 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.8, -2.3)
Pennington County Urban No 181.2 (166.2, 197.1) 23 (15, 39) 120 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Minnehaha County Urban No 211.9 (197.4, 227.0) 14 (7, 25) 181 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Bennett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buffalo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Campbell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Corson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Douglas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haakon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harding County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jerauld County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Potter County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sanborn County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sully County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ziebach County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/08/2024 2:42 am.

South Dakota County Name Change: please note that Shannon County, SD (FIPS code=46113) was renamed effective May 1, 2015, and the new name is Oglala Lakota County (FIPS Code=46102). This website now uses Oglala Lakota.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top