Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for South Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Dakota No 516.5 (505.2, 528.1) N/A 1,633 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.8)
United States No 501.7 (501.1, 502.3) N/A 569,776 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Hanson County No 1,093.1 (772.1, 1,495.1) 1 (1, 19) 9 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.5, 3.6)
Mellette County No 900.1 (601.3, 1,294.2) 2 (1, 55) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.1)
Todd County No 872.2 (673.1, 1,110.0) 3 (1, 23) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Oglala Lakota/Shannon County No 745.9 (585.0, 936.5) 4 (1, 37) 17 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Corson County No 719.3 (493.5, 1,010.2) 5 (1, 58) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.7)
Miner County No 707.8 (489.6, 989.5) 6 (1, 58) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.6)
McCook County No 706.8 (557.9, 883.6) 7 (1, 43) 16 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.8)
Butte County No 691.4 (580.3, 817.4) 8 (2, 33) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.0)
Jones County No 680.4 (392.6, 1,106.0) 9 (1, 61) 3
*
*
Fall River County No 676.4 (562.8, 806.7) 10 (2, 37) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Hamlin County No 666.1 (516.2, 846.0) 11 (2, 52) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Dewey County No 662.9 (477.9, 895.4) 12 (1, 55) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Jackson County No 653.5 (452.0, 916.1) 13 (1, 59) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Lyman County No 641.9 (462.0, 868.7) 14 (2, 57) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Aurora County No 621.6 (443.1, 850.9) 15 (2, 59) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Clay County No 611.2 (501.3, 738.3) 16 (4, 48) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Minnehaha County No 590.7 (561.1, 621.4) 17 (10, 29) 321 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.3)
Deuel County No 587.1 (443.3, 763.1) 18 (3, 58) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Meade County No 584.1 (514.5, 660.4) 19 (8, 42) 54 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Perkins County No 576.7 (413.6, 783.7) 20 (3, 60) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0)
Haakon County No 565.6 (362.0, 845.0) 21 (2, 61) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.9)
Kingsbury County No 554.4 (427.2, 708.3) 22 (4, 59) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Clark County No 550.7 (402.1, 737.9) 23 (3, 60) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Codington County No 541.1 (480.3, 607.4) 24 (12, 47) 60 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Gregory County No 534.5 (403.8, 695.7) 25 (5, 60) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Turner County No 534.0 (431.1, 654.1) 26 (7, 58) 20 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Union County No 533.4 (452.3, 624.8) 27 (9, 53) 32 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Hughes County No 527.2 (449.6, 614.3) 28 (11, 54) 34 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Grant County No 517.0 (412.6, 640.1) 29 (8, 59) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Bennett County No 507.1 (326.6, 751.7) 30 (3, 61) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.0)
Charles Mix County No 506.5 (409.4, 620.1) 31 (9, 59) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Davison County No 505.3 (437.2, 581.0) 32 (14, 54) 42 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Hyde County No 501.5 (303.8, 791.9) 33 (2, 61) 4
*
*
Stanley County No 500.5 (343.0, 706.9) 34 (4, 61) 7
*
*
Roberts County No 499.9 (408.0, 606.6) 35 (11, 59) 21 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Pennington County No 496.6 (466.1, 528.6) 36 (23, 48) 208 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
Bon Homme County No 496.2 (389.6, 623.5) 37 (9, 60) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Beadle County No 495.2 (423.5, 575.6) 38 (14, 56) 36 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Custer County No 489.3 (402.9, 588.8) 39 (12, 59) 25 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Day County No 489.2 (379.4, 621.9) 40 (9, 61) 15 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Spink County No 486.0 (376.3, 617.8) 41 (9, 60) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Walworth County No 480.6 (371.9, 612.6) 42 (10, 61) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Tripp County No 477.2 (365.4, 613.2) 43 (10, 61) 13 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Hutchinson County No 471.8 (374.0, 588.1) 44 (13, 61) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Faulk County No 467.7 (301.4, 694.0) 45 (6, 61) 5
*
*
McPherson County No 455.0 (304.4, 657.6) 46 (6, 61) 7 rising rising trend 6.4 (0.5, 12.6)
Brookings County No 454.0 (393.0, 521.8) 47 (22, 58) 41 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Brown County No 451.7 (403.9, 503.7) 48 (27, 58) 68 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Jerauld County No 450.8 (281.5, 687.8) 49 (4, 61) 5
*
*
Lawrence County No 434.9 (380.9, 494.6) 50 (28, 60) 49 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Moody County No 430.4 (324.2, 560.2) 51 (14, 61) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Lake County No 426.1 (347.3, 517.3) 52 (22, 61) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Potter County No 425.1 (285.5, 614.8) 53 (8, 61) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.3)
Sanborn County No 416.8 (254.3, 647.1) 54 (6, 61) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.5)
Marshall County No 413.3 (297.3, 559.6) 55 (15, 61) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Brule County No 408.2 (298.8, 545.9) 56 (15, 61) 10 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Yankton County No 406.3 (350.8, 468.3) 57 (34, 61) 40 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Edmunds County No 401.5 (275.5, 564.4) 58 (13, 61) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Lincoln County No 379.3 (337.2, 425.1) 59 (44, 61) 62 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.1, -2.4)
Douglas County No 370.4 (244.8, 540.5) 60 (15, 61) 6 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.1)
Hand County No 334.7 (224.9, 482.4) 61 (24, 61) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Buffalo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Campbell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harding County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sully County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ziebach County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 1:32 pm.

South Dakota County Name Change: please note that Shannon County, SD (FIPS code=46113) was renamed effective May 1, 2015, and the new name is Oglala Lakota County (FIPS Code=46102). This website will use Oglala Lakota/Shannon until the next incidence/mortality data release.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top