Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for South Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Dakota N/A No 505.8 (494.7, 517.1) N/A 1,640 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.7, -0.8)
United States N/A No 490.4 (489.9, 491.0) N/A 573,761 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Todd County Rural No 973.7 (736.3, 1,259.8) 1 (1, 16) 13 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.5, 14.9)
Hanson County Rural No 957.5 (632.0, 1,375.7) 2 (1, 44) 7 rising rising trend 8.2 (1.7, 35.9)
Mellette County Rural No 930.0 (610.8, 1,356.1) 3 (1, 48) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.5)
Dewey County Rural No 793.0 (570.3, 1,072.2) 4 (1, 41) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.2)
Oglala Lakota County Rural No 774.3 (604.3, 975.4) 5 (1, 26) 18
*
*
Jones County Rural No 734.6 (431.4, 1,178.1) 6 (1, 62) 4
*
*
Lyman County Rural No 721.7 (527.1, 964.1) 7 (1, 49) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
McCook County Urban No 707.4 (557.9, 885.1) 8 (1, 39) 16 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.9)
Faulk County Rural No 686.2 (477.1, 958.3) 9 (1, 58) 8
*
*
Hyde County Rural No 682.9 (418.9, 1,057.8) 10 (1, 62) 5
*
*
Aurora County Rural No 677.4 (484.8, 922.9) 11 (1, 57) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.0)
Jackson County Rural No 664.8 (442.3, 961.7) 12 (1, 60) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.2)
Butte County Rural No 629.7 (524.4, 750.0) 13 (4, 42) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.1)
Hamlin County Rural No 611.7 (466.0, 788.9) 14 (3, 54) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Minnehaha County Urban No 601.9 (572.2, 632.7) 15 (8, 23) 334 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.3)
Fall River County Rural No 588.5 (485.0, 707.9) 16 (5, 46) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Corson County Rural No 587.2 (382.1, 860.8) 17 (2, 62) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Miner County Rural No 562.2 (362.8, 828.3) 18 (2, 62) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Hughes County Rural No 561.4 (481.6, 650.7) 19 (8, 47) 37 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Clay County Rural No 537.5 (438.8, 652.1) 20 (7, 55) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Hutchinson County Rural No 531.7 (427.4, 654.7) 21 (7, 57) 20 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.2)
Perkins County Rural No 527.4 (373.7, 725.2) 22 (4, 62) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.7)
Roberts County Rural No 521.8 (426.9, 631.7) 23 (8, 56) 22 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Haakon County Rural No 513.7 (332.8, 765.7) 24 (3, 62) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.7)
Meade County Urban No 509.8 (447.9, 577.9) 25 (13, 51) 52 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Pennington County Urban No 507.8 (476.9, 540.2) 26 (18, 43) 214 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Walworth County Rural No 506.9 (392.3, 646.2) 27 (8, 60) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.1)
Union County Urban No 505.8 (429.6, 591.7) 28 (12, 55) 32 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Grant County Rural No 494.3 (396.5, 609.3) 29 (9, 59) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Codington County Rural No 492.7 (435.9, 554.8) 30 (15, 53) 56 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Custer County Urban No 487.0 (399.4, 588.0) 31 (12, 58) 24 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.1)
Sanborn County Rural No 485.8 (310.9, 727.6) 32 (4, 62) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.4)
Day County Rural No 482.4 (377.5, 609.4) 33 (9, 60) 15 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
Lake County Rural No 482.1 (391.5, 587.1) 34 (11, 59) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Brookings County Rural No 471.3 (410.5, 538.6) 35 (17, 56) 45 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Bon Homme County Rural No 471.1 (368.3, 594.4) 36 (10, 61) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.6)
Bennett County Rural No 469.7 (297.5, 704.6) 37 (5, 62) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.7)
Jerauld County Rural No 468.8 (289.0, 726.6) 38 (5, 62) 5
*
*
Beadle County Rural No 467.1 (399.8, 542.8) 39 (17, 58) 36 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Kingsbury County Rural No 466.7 (351.4, 608.7) 40 (10, 62) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
Hand County Rural No 466.4 (328.3, 645.0) 41 (6, 62) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.0)
Moody County Rural No 464.6 (354.2, 598.8) 42 (10, 62) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Charles Mix County Rural No 462.4 (366.5, 575.8) 43 (12, 61) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Gregory County Rural No 461.1 (337.4, 617.5) 44 (10, 62) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Brown County Rural No 459.5 (410.9, 512.4) 45 (21, 56) 68 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Stanley County Rural No 457.5 (307.8, 656.0) 46 (7, 62) 6
*
*
Lawrence County Rural No 457.5 (402.7, 517.6) 47 (21, 57) 54 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Edmunds County Rural No 453.8 (324.3, 617.7) 48 (8, 62) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.4)
Clark County Rural No 444.0 (314.6, 610.3) 49 (9, 62) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.7)
Deuel County Rural No 439.6 (318.1, 593.5) 50 (10, 62) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Davison County Rural No 435.3 (372.9, 505.2) 51 (21, 60) 37 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Turner County Urban No 421.8 (336.0, 523.5) 52 (18, 62) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Yankton County Rural No 415.1 (360.4, 475.9) 53 (28, 61) 43 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Marshall County Rural No 401.6 (284.9, 551.1) 54 (14, 62) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Potter County Rural No 393.1 (262.2, 571.0) 55 (11, 62) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.3)
Tripp County Rural No 383.9 (288.1, 502.7) 56 (20, 62) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Lincoln County Urban No 378.3 (339.5, 420.3) 57 (42, 62) 72 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 5.0)
Douglas County Rural No 365.5 (241.0, 535.9) 58 (16, 62) 6 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.4)
Spink County Rural No 358.0 (268.5, 468.5) 59 (26, 62) 12 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Brule County Rural No 355.1 (254.2, 483.8) 60 (22, 62) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
McPherson County Rural No 342.4 (221.7, 511.7) 61 (18, 62) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.1)
Campbell County Rural No 341.8 (191.8, 571.6) 62 (11, 62) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.3)
Buffalo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harding County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sully County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ziebach County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

South Dakota County Name Change: please note that Shannon County, SD (FIPS code=46113) was renamed effective May 1, 2015, and the new name is Oglala Lakota County (FIPS Code=46102). This website now uses Oglala Lakota.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top