Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Tennessee by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Ruralurban
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee N/A Yes 56.3 (55.5, 57.0) N/A 4,294 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.9)
United States N/A Yes 45.0 (44.9, 45.1) N/A 161,722 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.9)
Anderson County Urban Yes 58.9 (51.8, 66.9) 67 (25, 89) 54 falling falling trend -2.0 (-8.2, -1.1)
Blount County Urban Yes 50.5 (45.5, 56.0) 86 (61, 93) 83 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Bradley County Urban Yes 57.7 (51.6, 64.4) 74 (31, 89) 70 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Campbell County Urban Yes 91.9 (79.5, 106.0) 4 (1, 26) 43 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Cannon County Urban Yes 69.8 (51.7, 92.6) 29 (1, 93) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.8)
Carter County Urban Yes 54.6 (46.8, 63.4) 82 (33, 92) 40 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Cheatham County Urban Yes 60.0 (50.4, 71.0) 63 (16, 92) 31 falling falling trend -15.3 (-25.1, -1.6)
Chester County Urban Yes 70.3 (53.2, 91.4) 27 (1, 92) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.1)
Crockett County Urban Yes 77.3 (57.6, 102.0) 15 (1, 90) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Davidson County Urban Yes 47.4 (45.1, 49.8) 89 (79, 93) 335 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.2, -3.3)
Dickson County Urban Yes 68.4 (59.3, 78.8) 34 (9, 78) 43 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Fayette County Urban Yes 46.4 (37.8, 56.6) 90 (52, 93) 25 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.5)
Gibson County Urban Yes 72.1 (62.3, 83.3) 23 (5, 73) 41 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Grainger County Urban Yes 59.6 (47.4, 74.5) 65 (11, 93) 18 falling falling trend -13.9 (-30.6, -1.0)
Hamblen County Urban Yes 60.0 (52.1, 69.0) 62 (20, 89) 43 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Hamilton County Urban Yes 50.2 (47.0, 53.5) 87 (70, 92) 204 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Hawkins County Urban Yes 64.5 (55.6, 74.4) 45 (11, 86) 44 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Hickman County Urban Yes 97.0 (80.9, 115.7) 1 (1, 32) 28 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.4)
Jefferson County Urban Yes 57.9 (49.7, 67.2) 72 (26, 91) 40 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Knox County Urban Yes 49.7 (46.9, 52.7) 88 (74, 92) 250 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Loudon County Urban Yes 52.1 (43.8, 61.7) 84 (35, 93) 34 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Macon County Urban Yes 76.9 (62.6, 93.6) 17 (1, 76) 22 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Madison County Urban Yes 57.1 (50.5, 64.4) 76 (33, 89) 61 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Marion County Urban Yes 67.4 (55.2, 81.9) 37 (6, 89) 24 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Maury County Urban Yes 54.8 (48.7, 61.5) 81 (40, 91) 64 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Montgomery County Urban Yes 50.9 (46.5, 55.6) 85 (62, 93) 99 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Morgan County Urban Yes 83.0 (67.1, 102.0) 9 (1, 70) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Polk County Urban Yes 71.6 (55.7, 91.4) 24 (2, 89) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Roane County Urban Yes 59.8 (51.3, 69.5) 64 (20, 89) 41 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Robertson County Urban Yes 58.4 (51.1, 66.5) 69 (25, 90) 50 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Rutherford County Urban Yes 46.3 (43.1, 49.7) 91 (80, 93) 157 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -1.7)
Sequatchie County Urban Yes 60.5 (44.4, 81.1) 60 (5, 93) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.5)
Shelby County Urban Yes 56.2 (54.1, 58.5) 80 (56, 82) 544 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6)
Smith County Urban Yes 64.8 (50.6, 82.2) 44 (5, 92) 16 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.1)
Stewart County Urban Yes 67.8 (50.6, 89.9) 36 (2, 93) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.2)
Sullivan County Urban Yes 65.9 (60.5, 71.7) 40 (19, 69) 122 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Sumner County Urban Yes 53.8 (49.4, 58.5) 83 (53, 90) 118 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Tipton County Urban Yes 57.5 (49.6, 66.4) 75 (27, 91) 41 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Trousdale County Urban Yes 67.9 (48.6, 93.0) 35 (1, 93) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.5)
Unicoi County Urban Yes 66.7 (51.4, 86.0) 38 (3, 93) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.5)
Union County Urban Yes 70.1 (55.2, 88.2) 28 (2, 89) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.2)
Washington County Urban Yes 56.4 (50.9, 62.4) 78 (37, 89) 84 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Williamson County Urban Yes 27.9 (25.1, 30.9) 94 (93, 94) 78 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.2, -2.1)
Wilson County Urban Yes 43.4 (39.0, 48.3) 93 (82, 93) 73 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.4)
Bedford County Rural Yes 58.1 (49.1, 68.4) 71 (20, 92) 31 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Benton County Rural Yes 92.6 (72.6, 117.1) 3 (1, 65) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Bledsoe County Rural Yes 44.7 (32.5, 61.3) 92 (35, 94) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Carroll County Rural Yes 69.0 (56.0, 84.3) 31 (4, 87) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Claiborne County Rural Yes 77.5 (64.4, 92.7) 13 (1, 71) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.1)
Clay County Rural Yes 62.1 (40.4, 93.3) 57 (1, 94) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.0)
Cocke County Rural Yes 71.1 (60.1, 83.8) 26 (5, 79) 34 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Coffee County Rural Yes 64.9 (56.1, 74.9) 43 (12, 86) 42 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Cumberland County Rural Yes 60.2 (51.6, 70.2) 61 (20, 90) 44 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.1)
DeKalb County Rural Yes 63.7 (50.3, 80.0) 48 (7, 92) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Decatur County Rural Yes 62.1 (43.2, 87.4) 56 (2, 93) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Dyer County Rural Yes 71.5 (60.2, 84.6) 25 (4, 79) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Fentress County Rural Yes 63.0 (48.0, 81.6) 52 (5, 93) 14 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Franklin County Rural Yes 56.9 (47.3, 68.0) 77 (21, 93) 28 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Giles County Rural Yes 61.3 (49.5, 75.3) 58 (11, 93) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Greene County Rural Yes 59.4 (51.9, 67.8) 66 (24, 89) 51 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Grundy County Rural Yes 75.6 (56.4, 99.8) 18 (1, 92) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 2.1)
Hancock County Rural Yes 94.8 (65.9, 133.9) 2 (1, 86) 8
*
*
Hardeman County Rural Yes 65.3 (52.3, 80.8) 41 (5, 92) 19 falling falling trend -3.4 (-15.4, -0.8)
Hardin County Rural Yes 73.0 (59.4, 89.2) 22 (3, 82) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Haywood County Rural Yes 84.4 (66.8, 105.8) 7 (1, 70) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Henderson County Rural Yes 82.5 (68.1, 99.2) 10 (1, 62) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Henry County Rural Yes 66.1 (54.7, 79.4) 39 (8, 88) 27 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Houston County Rural Yes 83.8 (59.7, 115.9) 8 (1, 90) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.8)
Humphreys County Rural Yes 68.7 (54.0, 86.7) 33 (3, 91) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Jackson County Rural Yes 69.6 (51.1, 93.9) 30 (1, 93) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.2)
Johnson County Rural Yes 79.3 (62.7, 99.7) 12 (1, 79) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Lake County Rural Yes 57.9 (36.9, 88.9) 73 (3, 94) 5 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.6)
Lauderdale County Rural Yes 68.7 (55.4, 84.6) 32 (4, 89) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.6)
Lawrence County Rural Yes 63.4 (53.5, 74.8) 50 (12, 89) 32 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Lewis County Rural Yes 73.4 (53.9, 98.4) 21 (1, 93) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.5)
Lincoln County Rural Yes 61.2 (50.4, 73.8) 59 (13, 92) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Marshall County Rural Yes 62.3 (51.5, 75.0) 53 (11, 92) 25 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.2)
McMinn County Rural Yes 65.1 (55.9, 75.6) 42 (12, 85) 40 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
McNairy County Rural Yes 62.3 (49.9, 77.2) 54 (7, 92) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Meigs County Rural Yes 87.6 (66.7, 113.8) 5 (1, 75) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.3)
Monroe County Rural Yes 77.4 (66.3, 89.9) 14 (2, 60) 41 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Moore County Rural Yes 56.3 (33.3, 90.7) 79 (1, 94) 4
*
*
Obion County Rural Yes 63.5 (52.0, 77.1) 49 (9, 91) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Overton County Rural Yes 87.1 (71.0, 106.1) 6 (1, 53) 23 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.1)
Perry County Rural Yes 58.3 (38.9, 85.5) 70 (2, 94) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Putnam County Rural Yes 58.4 (51.0, 66.7) 68 (25, 90) 47 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Rhea County Rural Yes 80.6 (67.8, 95.4) 11 (1, 61) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Scott County Rural Yes 75.0 (60.5, 92.2) 19 (1, 81) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.3)
Sevier County Rural Yes 63.0 (56.4, 70.3) 51 (19, 82) 73 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Van Buren County Rural Yes 77.2 (51.3, 114.2) 16 (1, 93) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.3)
Warren County Rural Yes 64.4 (53.9, 76.5) 46 (10, 88) 29 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Wayne County Rural Yes 73.7 (57.4, 93.9) 20 (1, 88) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Weakley County Rural Yes 62.2 (50.3, 76.2) 55 (8, 92) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
White County Rural Yes 63.7 (51.8, 77.9) 47 (8, 92) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Pickett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/06/2024 10:11 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top