Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Tennessee by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee N/A No 927.0 (918.9, 935.3) N/A 10,119 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
United States N/A No 844.0 (842.9, 845.1) N/A 441,232 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Overton County Rural No 1,279.4 (1,128.5, 1,444.8) 1 (1, 34) 54 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.6)
Gibson County Urban No 1,208.5 (1,106.3, 1,317.5) 2 (1, 36) 104 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Lauderdale County Rural No 1,199.3 (1,046.9, 1,367.7) 3 (1, 62) 46 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Chester County Urban No 1,187.7 (1,015.1, 1,381.2) 4 (1, 67) 34 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.6)
Hardeman County Rural No 1,162.1 (1,023.3, 1,314.6) 5 (1, 63) 52 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Cheatham County Urban No 1,161.0 (1,034.0, 1,299.2) 6 (1, 53) 66 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.4)
Clay County Rural No 1,151.2 (941.8, 1,393.4) 7 (1, 87) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.6)
Houston County Rural No 1,149.0 (924.9, 1,410.9) 8 (1, 90) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Trousdale County Urban No 1,139.8 (892.4, 1,434.1) 9 (1, 91) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Lake County Rural No 1,137.9 (865.3, 1,468.7) 10 (1, 94) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.7)
Carroll County Rural No 1,134.2 (1,010.6, 1,268.8) 11 (1, 67) 62 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Tipton County Urban No 1,131.1 (1,029.7, 1,239.7) 12 (1, 55) 96 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.4)
Van Buren County Rural No 1,124.8 (881.5, 1,414.6) 13 (1, 94) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.2)
Polk County Urban No 1,119.6 (965.4, 1,291.2) 14 (1, 77) 39 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Crockett County Urban No 1,115.3 (937.9, 1,316.5) 15 (1, 85) 28 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.4)
Lewis County Rural No 1,103.2 (925.7, 1,304.8) 16 (1, 86) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Warren County Rural No 1,101.7 (992.7, 1,219.3) 17 (1, 66) 76 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Smith County Urban No 1,101.2 (940.4, 1,281.7) 18 (1, 83) 35 falling falling trend -2.2 (-8.2, -0.2)
McNairy County Rural No 1,087.7 (962.3, 1,225.0) 19 (1, 78) 56 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
DeKalb County Rural No 1,086.2 (935.4, 1,254.3) 20 (1, 85) 38 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Dickson County Urban No 1,076.5 (976.9, 1,183.5) 21 (3, 68) 89 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Stewart County Urban No 1,074.7 (899.7, 1,273.6) 22 (1, 89) 27 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Putnam County Rural No 1,068.6 (987.7, 1,154.3) 23 (5, 63) 132 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Union County Urban No 1,064.5 (912.8, 1,234.1) 24 (1, 86) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Unicoi County Urban No 1,059.5 (920.9, 1,212.9) 25 (1, 87) 42 falling falling trend -1.5 (-7.4, -0.3)
Bedford County Rural No 1,056.9 (950.5, 1,171.9) 26 (4, 76) 75 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Cannon County Urban No 1,056.7 (881.3, 1,256.7) 27 (1, 90) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.1)
Fentress County Rural No 1,054.1 (911.6, 1,212.7) 28 (2, 86) 41 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Humphreys County Rural No 1,051.9 (906.9, 1,213.6) 29 (1, 88) 38 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Grainger County Urban No 1,051.7 (918.4, 1,198.8) 30 (2, 85) 48 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.2)
McMinn County Rural No 1,047.9 (961.4, 1,140.0) 31 (6, 68) 109 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.1, 0.6)
Decatur County Rural No 1,046.4 (876.0, 1,240.2) 32 (1, 91) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Marshall County Rural No 1,045.0 (922.6, 1,179.1) 33 (2, 83) 55 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Johnson County Rural No 1,042.6 (903.5, 1,196.9) 34 (1, 87) 41 stable stable trend -0.8 (-9.3, 0.2)
Rhea County Rural No 1,032.7 (918.1, 1,157.7) 35 (4, 84) 61 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Hawkins County Urban No 1,031.5 (949.2, 1,119.0) 36 (8, 74) 119 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.5)
Greene County Rural No 1,026.3 (952.9, 1,103.7) 37 (10, 70) 149 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Wayne County Rural No 1,025.4 (870.2, 1,200.4) 38 (2, 90) 31 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.1)
Cocke County Rural No 1,025.4 (920.3, 1,139.2) 39 (5, 82) 73 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Montgomery County Urban No 1,023.8 (959.6, 1,091.2) 40 (12, 68) 200 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Benton County Rural No 1,023.5 (879.9, 1,183.8) 41 (2, 89) 37 falling falling trend -9.3 (-17.1, -0.3)
Macon County Urban No 1,023.4 (880.4, 1,182.8) 42 (3, 90) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Weakley County Rural No 1,021.3 (908.0, 1,144.7) 43 (4, 86) 60 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Hickman County Urban No 1,017.8 (883.3, 1,167.1) 44 (3, 89) 43 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Dyer County Rural No 1,015.6 (906.7, 1,134.0) 45 (5, 84) 64 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Jackson County Rural No 1,015.6 (844.2, 1,211.7) 46 (1, 93) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.6)
Henry County Rural No 1,015.0 (912.6, 1,125.7) 47 (6, 84) 73 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Obion County Rural No 1,013.8 (903.0, 1,134.5) 48 (5, 84) 62 falling falling trend -1.2 (-5.0, -0.6)
Robertson County Urban No 1,011.9 (924.1, 1,105.7) 49 (8, 79) 103 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Lawrence County Rural No 1,009.3 (910.0, 1,116.5) 50 (8, 82) 76 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Henderson County Rural No 1,005.9 (885.4, 1,138.1) 51 (4, 89) 51 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Claiborne County Rural No 1,004.6 (892.8, 1,126.6) 52 (4, 87) 61 falling falling trend -1.5 (-6.7, -0.6)
Grundy County Rural No 994.4 (833.5, 1,177.6) 53 (2, 93) 27 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Hamblen County Urban No 985.8 (905.0, 1,071.9) 54 (14, 82) 111 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Scott County Rural No 983.7 (841.2, 1,143.4) 55 (4, 91) 35 falling falling trend -12.2 (-19.6, -2.8)
Pickett County Rural No 983.5 (757.3, 1,255.7) 56 (1, 95) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.9)
Coffee County Rural No 970.8 (884.7, 1,062.9) 57 (15, 85) 94 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Monroe County Rural No 970.3 (881.7, 1,065.5) 58 (14, 86) 91 falling falling trend -2.8 (-12.0, -0.7)
White County Rural No 956.0 (841.5, 1,081.6) 59 (8, 91) 51 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Sevier County Rural No 956.0 (892.4, 1,022.9) 60 (25, 82) 176 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Rutherford County Urban No 950.8 (903.7, 999.7) 61 (33, 79) 320 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Marion County Urban No 949.7 (835.7, 1,074.8) 62 (10, 92) 52 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.1)
Meigs County Rural No 942.9 (771.8, 1,140.3) 63 (4, 95) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Lincoln County Rural No 941.0 (838.9, 1,052.0) 64 (15, 91) 63 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Sullivan County Urban No 940.1 (894.2, 987.8) 65 (39, 81) 316 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.9)
Anderson County Urban No 930.8 (862.0, 1,003.7) 66 (29, 88) 138 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Washington County Urban No 929.3 (874.5, 986.5) 67 (38, 85) 219 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.7)
Bradley County Urban No 927.2 (864.5, 993.2) 68 (35, 87) 165 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.2)
Morgan County Urban No 923.2 (785.3, 1,078.2) 69 (9, 94) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Giles County Rural No 909.8 (804.3, 1,025.4) 70 (19, 94) 55 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Hancock County Rural No 908.3 (695.5, 1,166.1) 71 (1, 95) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Haywood County Rural No 903.9 (763.5, 1,062.7) 72 (9, 94) 30 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Sumner County Urban No 899.8 (851.5, 950.2) 73 (48, 88) 266 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.2, 5.1)
Madison County Urban No 896.6 (832.2, 964.6) 74 (39, 90) 147 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Jefferson County Urban No 896.0 (817.2, 980.4) 75 (36, 91) 97 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.2)
Shelby County Urban No 893.8 (869.8, 918.3) 76 (60, 83) 1,094 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -2.1)
Campbell County Urban No 892.5 (800.4, 992.3) 77 (31, 93) 70 falling falling trend -4.8 (-12.9, -1.1)
Wilson County Urban No 882.8 (826.5, 941.8) 78 (48, 90) 191 falling falling trend -1.7 (-4.2, -1.2)
Maury County Urban No 882.4 (816.4, 952.3) 79 (44, 91) 138 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Blount County Urban No 881.9 (831.6, 934.5) 80 (53, 90) 234 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.8)
Carter County Urban No 881.3 (807.9, 959.6) 81 (42, 92) 107 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.2, -1.2)
Knox County Urban No 867.2 (837.0, 898.2) 82 (65, 88) 636 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.3)
Roane County Urban No 855.2 (782.3, 933.1) 83 (50, 93) 103 falling falling trend -2.6 (-6.2, -1.5)
Cumberland County Rural No 852.7 (793.2, 915.5) 84 (56, 93) 156 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Fayette County Urban No 850.0 (763.5, 943.5) 85 (44, 94) 73 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.6)
Davidson County Urban No 843.9 (816.0, 872.6) 86 (72, 90) 717 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.9)
Franklin County Rural No 817.4 (732.2, 909.8) 87 (56, 95) 68 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Hamilton County Urban No 812.9 (781.6, 845.1) 88 (78, 93) 519 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
Perry County Rural No 806.1 (627.2, 1,020.4) 89 (17, 95) 14 falling falling trend -23.3 (-38.8, -3.3)
Loudon County Urban No 794.4 (729.2, 863.8) 90 (70, 95) 112 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Sequatchie County Urban No 757.7 (626.5, 908.3) 91 (47, 95) 24 falling falling trend -5.4 (-15.1, -1.2)
Williamson County Urban No 757.0 (714.2, 801.7) 92 (84, 95) 242 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 4.2)
Hardin County Rural No 753.6 (659.8, 857.1) 93 (66, 95) 47 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Bledsoe County Rural No 703.2 (568.0, 860.7) 94 (61, 95) 19 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Moore County Rural No 638.6 (463.3, 858.2) 95 (54, 95) 9 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top