Mortality > Table
Death Rates Table
County |
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tennessee | No | 142.7 (141.2, 144.3) | N/A | 6,603 | falling | -1.2 (-1.4, -1.1) |
United States | No | 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) | N/A | 283,896 | falling | -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7) |
Pickett County | Yes | 100.2 (59.2, 164.3) | 95 (8, 95) | 5 | stable | -0.5 (-2.4, 1.5) |
Williamson County | Yes | 107.1 (99.3, 115.5) | 94 (87, 95) | 142 | falling | -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2) |
Moore County | Yes | 110.6 (69.8, 169.3) | 93 (6, 95) | 5 | falling | -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3) |
Bledsoe County | Yes | 120.4 (92.1, 156.8) | 92 (14, 95) | 13 | falling | -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1) |
Loudon County | Yes | 120.6 (106.5, 136.5) | 91 (48, 95) | 61 | falling | -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6) |
Fayette County | No | 122.8 (105.8, 142.3) | 90 (41, 95) | 40 | falling | -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4) |
Hamilton County | No | 123.7 (117.7, 130.0) | 89 (73, 93) | 335 | falling | -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1) |
Haywood County | No | 125.6 (100.2, 156.3) | 88 (20, 95) | 18 | stable | -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3) |
Wilson County | No | 126.2 (115.9, 137.3) | 87 (56, 93) | 114 | falling | -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7) |
Trousdale County | No | 129.7 (89.9, 182.1) | 86 (2, 95) | 7 | stable | -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3) |
Carter County | No | 131.9 (117.2, 148.3) | 85 (32, 94) | 63 | stable | -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2) |
Sequatchie County | No | 132.4 (103.5, 168.0) | 84 (9, 95) | 15 | stable | 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9) |
Jefferson County | No | 132.8 (117.5, 149.9) | 83 (30, 93) | 57 | falling | -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3) |
Cannon County | No | 133.7 (103.5, 171.0) | 82 (8, 95) | 14 | stable | 0.3 (-0.9, 1.4) |
Rutherford County | No | 134.2 (126.0, 142.8) | 81 (47, 90) | 207 | falling | -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8) |
Davidson County | No | 134.4 (129.2, 139.8) | 80 (57, 87) | 517 | falling | -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6) |
Cumberland County | No | 135.2 (121.1, 150.9) | 79 (30, 93) | 83 | falling | -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1) |
Knox County | No | 135.2 (129.4, 141.3) | 78 (52, 87) | 422 | falling | -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8) |
Hancock County | No | 135.6 (93.9, 192.9) | 77 (1, 95) | 7 | stable | 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7) |
Jackson County | No | 136.0 (105.9, 174.5) | 76 (7, 95) | 14 | stable | -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5) |
Obion County | No | 136.5 (116.2, 159.7) | 75 (16, 94) | 35 | falling | -4.8 (-9.1, -0.2) |
Hamblen County | No | 137.1 (122.5, 153.2) | 74 (27, 92) | 67 | falling | -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3) |
Van Buren County | No | 138.1 (94.8, 199.5) | 73 (1, 95) | 7 | falling | -1.9 (-3.6, -0.2) |
Blount County | No | 138.2 (128.0, 149.0) | 72 (33, 89) | 146 | falling | -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1) |
Hardin County | No | 138.3 (116.5, 163.7) | 71 (12, 94) | 31 | stable | -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8) |
Marion County | No | 138.7 (117.2, 163.5) | 70 (13, 94) | 31 | stable | -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0) |
Lewis County | No | 140.1 (107.9, 180.3) | 69 (3, 95) | 14 | stable | -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5) |
Sumner County | No | 141.2 (131.9, 151.0) | 68 (34, 86) | 177 | falling | -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2) |
Anderson County | No | 141.3 (127.9, 156.0) | 67 (25, 90) | 88 | falling | -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2) |
Giles County | No | 141.4 (120.1, 165.9) | 66 (11, 93) | 33 | stable | -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1) |
Franklin County | No | 141.5 (122.7, 162.7) | 65 (13, 93) | 45 | stable | -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1) |
Robertson County | No | 143.3 (127.8, 160.3) | 64 (18, 90) | 64 | falling | -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1) |
Lincoln County | No | 143.5 (123.7, 166.0) | 63 (11, 93) | 39 | falling | -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2) |
McMinn County | No | 144.4 (128.1, 162.4) | 62 (15, 91) | 61 | falling | -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2) |
Cocke County | No | 144.4 (125.2, 166.2) | 61 (12, 92) | 43 | falling | -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5) |
Putnam County | No | 144.4 (130.1, 160.0) | 60 (20, 89) | 78 | stable | -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2) |
Shelby County | No | 145.0 (140.6, 149.6) | 59 (39, 73) | 836 | falling | -1.9 (-2.4, -1.4) |
Washington County | No | 145.2 (134.2, 156.9) | 58 (24, 84) | 137 | stable | -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5) |
Bradley County | No | 145.2 (133.0, 158.3) | 57 (22, 87) | 110 | stable | -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0) |
Maury County | No | 145.3 (132.0, 159.6) | 56 (19, 87) | 93 | falling | -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3) |
Decatur County | No | 145.3 (112.1, 187.0) | 55 (2, 95) | 15 | stable | -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1) |
Marshall County | No | 145.5 (124.1, 169.9) | 54 (7, 93) | 34 | stable | -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0) |
White County | No | 145.8 (123.4, 171.7) | 53 (7, 93) | 32 | stable | -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4) |
Union County | No | 146.7 (119.3, 179.2) | 52 (4, 94) | 21 | stable | 0.1 (-0.9, 1.0) |
Sullivan County | No | 147.5 (138.1, 157.5) | 51 (24, 79) | 200 | stable | -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0) |
Madison County | No | 147.9 (135.2, 161.7) | 50 (18, 84) | 105 | stable | 1.2 (-1.4, 3.8) |
Morgan County | No | 148.0 (120.0, 181.4) | 49 (3, 94) | 21 | stable | -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5) |
Henry County | No | 148.2 (128.4, 170.7) | 48 (9, 91) | 44 | stable | -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1) |
Roane County | No | 148.5 (132.6, 166.1) | 47 (14, 87) | 70 | stable | -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1) |
Montgomery County | No | 148.7 (137.2, 160.8) | 46 (19, 81) | 130 | falling | -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2) |
Clay County | No | 148.7 (109.3, 201.3) | 45 (1, 95) | 10 | stable | -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2) |
Coffee County | No | 150.9 (133.9, 169.5) | 44 (10, 87) | 60 | stable | -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2) |
Fentress County | No | 150.9 (123.5, 183.6) | 43 (3, 93) | 23 | stable | -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2) |
Bedford County | No | 152.4 (133.3, 173.7) | 42 (8, 88) | 47 | stable | -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2) |
Sevier County | No | 152.5 (139.7, 166.3) | 41 (14, 80) | 113 | stable | -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4) |
Humphreys County | No | 152.8 (124.8, 186.0) | 40 (2, 94) | 22 | stable | -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5) |
Grainger County | No | 153.7 (128.7, 182.9) | 39 (4, 92) | 29 | stable | 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0) |
Unicoi County | No | 154.2 (126.5, 187.4) | 38 (2, 93) | 24 | stable | -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6) |
Lawrence County | No | 154.4 (135.5, 175.6) | 37 (6, 86) | 50 | stable | -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2) |
DeKalb County | No | 156.0 (129.0, 187.9) | 36 (1, 92) | 24 | stable | -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7) |
Warren County | No | 158.8 (138.8, 181.3) | 35 (4, 86) | 47 | stable | 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0) |
Tipton County | No | 160.0 (142.3, 179.5) | 34 (6, 81) | 61 | stable | -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1) |
Macon County | No | 160.1 (132.9, 191.6) | 33 (2, 90) | 25 | stable | -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6) |
Greene County | No | 160.3 (145.5, 176.3) | 32 (7, 72) | 93 | stable | 0.1 (-0.6, 0.7) |
Wayne County | No | 160.6 (130.1, 197.8) | 31 (1, 92) | 21 | stable | 0.2 (-0.6, 0.9) |
Hawkins County | No | 160.7 (143.7, 179.4) | 30 (5, 78) | 72 | stable | -1.7 (-3.8, 0.3) |
Stewart County | No | 160.8 (126.7, 202.5) | 29 (1, 93) | 16 | stable | -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3) |
Henderson County | No | 161.4 (136.9, 189.4) | 28 (2, 88) | 33 | stable | 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7) |
Monroe County | No | 161.7 (142.7, 182.9) | 27 (4, 82) | 58 | stable | -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4) |
Weakley County | No | 162.1 (139.3, 187.9) | 26 (3, 87) | 39 | stable | 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5) |
Dyer County | No | 162.8 (141.5, 186.6) | 25 (3, 83) | 44 | stable | -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3) |
Rhea County | No | 163.3 (141.0, 188.7) | 24 (2, 85) | 40 | stable | -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4) |
Smith County | No | 163.9 (134.0, 199.1) | 23 (1, 90) | 22 | stable | 0.1 (-1.0, 1.1) |
Campbell County | No | 165.5 (145.4, 188.0) | 22 (3, 80) | 52 | stable | -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2) |
Polk County | No | 165.6 (135.6, 201.3) | 21 (1, 90) | 23 | stable | -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2) |
Cheatham County | No | 166.4 (143.9, 191.6) | 20 (2, 81) | 42 | stable | -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1) |
Claiborne County | No | 166.5 (143.4, 192.7) | 19 (2, 84) | 40 | stable | -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6) |
Lake County | No | 167.6 (117.5, 237.0) | 18 (1, 95) | 8 | stable | -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8) |
Meigs County | No | 168.8 (131.7, 214.4) | 17 (1, 92) | 15 | stable | 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5) |
Hickman County | No | 169.0 (141.6, 200.6) | 16 (1, 85) | 29 | stable | -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8) |
Chester County | No | 169.4 (137.9, 206.6) | 15 (1, 91) | 21 | stable | 0.6 (-0.7, 2.0) |
McNairy County | No | 172.8 (147.3, 201.9) | 14 (1, 80) | 36 | stable | 0.6 (-0.2, 1.3) |
Gibson County | No | 172.8 (154.3, 193.2) | 13 (2, 62) | 66 | stable | 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5) |
Dickson County | No | 178.7 (159.3, 200.0) | 12 (1, 54) | 64 | stable | 0.3 (-0.3, 1.0) |
Johnson County | No | 181.9 (149.5, 220.5) | 11 (1, 88) | 26 | stable | 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1) |
Lauderdale County | No | 182.9 (154.8, 215.1) | 10 (1, 74) | 31 | stable | -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6) |
Grundy County | No | 182.9 (146.7, 226.6) | 9 (1, 83) | 19 | stable | 0.4 (-0.8, 1.5) |
Perry County | No | 184.7 (137.1, 245.5) | 8 (1, 92) | 11 | stable | 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7) |
Houston County | No | 185.4 (140.1, 242.9) | 7 (1, 92) | 12 | stable | 0.8 (-0.4, 2.1) |
Carroll County | No | 185.8 (160.8, 214.1) | 6 (1, 58) | 42 | stable | -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2) |
Crockett County | No | 189.7 (152.2, 234.4) | 5 (1, 80) | 19 | stable | 1.1 (0.0, 2.3) |
Benton County | No | 189.8 (157.8, 227.8) | 4 (1, 67) | 27 | rising | 1.2 (0.1, 2.2) |
Hardeman County | No | 193.2 (163.8, 227.0) | 3 (1, 59) | 34 | stable | 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3) |
Scott County | No | 193.9 (163.8, 228.4) | 2 (1, 56) | 30 | stable | 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8) |
Overton County | No | 197.2 (168.1, 230.7) | 1 (1, 56) | 35 | stable | 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/18/2024 9:06 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/18/2024 9:06 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.