Mortality > Table
Death Rates Table
County |
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tennessee | No | 142.7 (141.2, 144.3) | N/A | 6,603 | falling | -1.2 (-1.4, -1.1) |
United States | No | 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) | N/A | 283,896 | falling | -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7) |
Obion County | No | 136.5 (116.2, 159.7) | 75 (16, 94) | 35 | falling | -4.8 (-9.1, -0.2) |
Moore County | Yes | 110.6 (69.8, 169.3) | 93 (6, 95) | 5 | falling | -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3) |
Shelby County | No | 145.0 (140.6, 149.6) | 59 (39, 73) | 836 | falling | -1.9 (-2.4, -1.4) |
Van Buren County | No | 138.1 (94.8, 199.5) | 73 (1, 95) | 7 | falling | -1.9 (-3.6, -0.2) |
Davidson County | No | 134.4 (129.2, 139.8) | 80 (57, 87) | 517 | falling | -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6) |
Hawkins County | No | 160.7 (143.7, 179.4) | 30 (5, 78) | 72 | stable | -1.7 (-3.8, 0.3) |
Williamson County | Yes | 107.1 (99.3, 115.5) | 94 (87, 95) | 142 | falling | -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2) |
Hamilton County | No | 123.7 (117.7, 130.0) | 89 (73, 93) | 335 | falling | -1.3 (-1.6, -1.1) |
Bledsoe County | Yes | 120.4 (92.1, 156.8) | 92 (14, 95) | 13 | falling | -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1) |
Loudon County | Yes | 120.6 (106.5, 136.5) | 91 (48, 95) | 61 | falling | -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6) |
Rutherford County | No | 134.2 (126.0, 142.8) | 81 (47, 90) | 207 | falling | -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8) |
Cocke County | No | 144.4 (125.2, 166.2) | 61 (12, 92) | 43 | falling | -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5) |
Fayette County | No | 122.8 (105.8, 142.3) | 90 (41, 95) | 40 | falling | -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4) |
Trousdale County | No | 129.7 (89.9, 182.1) | 86 (2, 95) | 7 | stable | -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3) |
Wilson County | No | 126.2 (115.9, 137.3) | 87 (56, 93) | 114 | falling | -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7) |
Jefferson County | No | 132.8 (117.5, 149.9) | 83 (30, 93) | 57 | falling | -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3) |
Knox County | No | 135.2 (129.4, 141.3) | 78 (52, 87) | 422 | falling | -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8) |
Fentress County | No | 150.9 (123.5, 183.6) | 43 (3, 93) | 23 | stable | -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2) |
Hamblen County | No | 137.1 (122.5, 153.2) | 74 (27, 92) | 67 | falling | -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3) |
Marion County | No | 138.7 (117.2, 163.5) | 70 (13, 94) | 31 | stable | -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0) |
Maury County | No | 145.3 (132.0, 159.6) | 56 (19, 87) | 93 | falling | -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3) |
Decatur County | No | 145.3 (112.1, 187.0) | 55 (2, 95) | 15 | stable | -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1) |
Lincoln County | No | 143.5 (123.7, 166.0) | 63 (11, 93) | 39 | falling | -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2) |
Robertson County | No | 143.3 (127.8, 160.3) | 64 (18, 90) | 64 | falling | -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1) |
Cheatham County | No | 166.4 (143.9, 191.6) | 20 (2, 81) | 42 | stable | -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1) |
Cumberland County | No | 135.2 (121.1, 150.9) | 79 (30, 93) | 83 | falling | -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1) |
Jackson County | No | 136.0 (105.9, 174.5) | 76 (7, 95) | 14 | stable | -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5) |
Lake County | No | 167.6 (117.5, 237.0) | 18 (1, 95) | 8 | stable | -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8) |
McMinn County | No | 144.4 (128.1, 162.4) | 62 (15, 91) | 61 | falling | -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2) |
Polk County | No | 165.6 (135.6, 201.3) | 21 (1, 90) | 23 | stable | -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2) |
Anderson County | No | 141.3 (127.9, 156.0) | 67 (25, 90) | 88 | falling | -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2) |
Franklin County | No | 141.5 (122.7, 162.7) | 65 (13, 93) | 45 | stable | -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1) |
Marshall County | No | 145.5 (124.1, 169.9) | 54 (7, 93) | 34 | stable | -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0) |
Montgomery County | No | 148.7 (137.2, 160.8) | 46 (19, 81) | 130 | falling | -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2) |
Morgan County | No | 148.0 (120.0, 181.4) | 49 (3, 94) | 21 | stable | -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5) |
Sumner County | No | 141.2 (131.9, 151.0) | 68 (34, 86) | 177 | falling | -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2) |
Bedford County | No | 152.4 (133.3, 173.7) | 42 (8, 88) | 47 | stable | -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2) |
Blount County | No | 138.2 (128.0, 149.0) | 72 (33, 89) | 146 | falling | -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1) |
Bradley County | No | 145.2 (133.0, 158.3) | 57 (22, 87) | 110 | stable | -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0) |
Campbell County | No | 165.5 (145.4, 188.0) | 22 (3, 80) | 52 | stable | -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2) |
Carter County | No | 131.9 (117.2, 148.3) | 85 (32, 94) | 63 | stable | -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2) |
Coffee County | No | 150.9 (133.9, 169.5) | 44 (10, 87) | 60 | stable | -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2) |
Giles County | No | 141.4 (120.1, 165.9) | 66 (11, 93) | 33 | stable | -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1) |
Haywood County | No | 125.6 (100.2, 156.3) | 88 (20, 95) | 18 | stable | -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3) |
Henry County | No | 148.2 (128.4, 170.7) | 48 (9, 91) | 44 | stable | -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1) |
Pickett County | Yes | 100.2 (59.2, 164.3) | 95 (8, 95) | 5 | stable | -0.5 (-2.4, 1.5) |
Tipton County | No | 160.0 (142.3, 179.5) | 34 (6, 81) | 61 | stable | -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1) |
White County | No | 145.8 (123.4, 171.7) | 53 (7, 93) | 32 | stable | -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4) |
Dyer County | No | 162.8 (141.5, 186.6) | 25 (3, 83) | 44 | stable | -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3) |
Humphreys County | No | 152.8 (124.8, 186.0) | 40 (2, 94) | 22 | stable | -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5) |
Lawrence County | No | 154.4 (135.5, 175.6) | 37 (6, 86) | 50 | stable | -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2) |
Lewis County | No | 140.1 (107.9, 180.3) | 69 (3, 95) | 14 | stable | -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5) |
Putnam County | No | 144.4 (130.1, 160.0) | 60 (20, 89) | 78 | stable | -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2) |
Roane County | No | 148.5 (132.6, 166.1) | 47 (14, 87) | 70 | stable | -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1) |
Sullivan County | No | 147.5 (138.1, 157.5) | 51 (24, 79) | 200 | stable | -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0) |
Carroll County | No | 185.8 (160.8, 214.1) | 6 (1, 58) | 42 | stable | -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2) |
DeKalb County | No | 156.0 (129.0, 187.9) | 36 (1, 92) | 24 | stable | -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7) |
Rhea County | No | 163.3 (141.0, 188.7) | 24 (2, 85) | 40 | stable | -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4) |
Unicoi County | No | 154.2 (126.5, 187.4) | 38 (2, 93) | 24 | stable | -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6) |
Clay County | No | 148.7 (109.3, 201.3) | 45 (1, 95) | 10 | stable | -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2) |
Hickman County | No | 169.0 (141.6, 200.6) | 16 (1, 85) | 29 | stable | -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8) |
Lauderdale County | No | 182.9 (154.8, 215.1) | 10 (1, 74) | 31 | stable | -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6) |
Macon County | No | 160.1 (132.9, 191.6) | 33 (2, 90) | 25 | stable | -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6) |
Monroe County | No | 161.7 (142.7, 182.9) | 27 (4, 82) | 58 | stable | -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4) |
Stewart County | No | 160.8 (126.7, 202.5) | 29 (1, 93) | 16 | stable | -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3) |
Washington County | No | 145.2 (134.2, 156.9) | 58 (24, 84) | 137 | stable | -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5) |
Claiborne County | No | 166.5 (143.4, 192.7) | 19 (2, 84) | 40 | stable | -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6) |
Hardin County | No | 138.3 (116.5, 163.7) | 71 (12, 94) | 31 | stable | -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8) |
Sevier County | No | 152.5 (139.7, 166.3) | 41 (14, 80) | 113 | stable | -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4) |
Gibson County | No | 172.8 (154.3, 193.2) | 13 (2, 62) | 66 | stable | 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5) |
Grainger County | No | 153.7 (128.7, 182.9) | 39 (4, 92) | 29 | stable | 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0) |
Henderson County | No | 161.4 (136.9, 189.4) | 28 (2, 88) | 33 | stable | 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7) |
Scott County | No | 193.9 (163.8, 228.4) | 2 (1, 56) | 30 | stable | 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8) |
Weakley County | No | 162.1 (139.3, 187.9) | 26 (3, 87) | 39 | stable | 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5) |
Greene County | No | 160.3 (145.5, 176.3) | 32 (7, 72) | 93 | stable | 0.1 (-0.6, 0.7) |
Hancock County | No | 135.6 (93.9, 192.9) | 77 (1, 95) | 7 | stable | 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7) |
Johnson County | No | 181.9 (149.5, 220.5) | 11 (1, 88) | 26 | stable | 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1) |
Smith County | No | 163.9 (134.0, 199.1) | 23 (1, 90) | 22 | stable | 0.1 (-1.0, 1.1) |
Union County | No | 146.7 (119.3, 179.2) | 52 (4, 94) | 21 | stable | 0.1 (-0.9, 1.0) |
Wayne County | No | 160.6 (130.1, 197.8) | 31 (1, 92) | 21 | stable | 0.2 (-0.6, 0.9) |
Cannon County | No | 133.7 (103.5, 171.0) | 82 (8, 95) | 14 | stable | 0.3 (-0.9, 1.4) |
Dickson County | No | 178.7 (159.3, 200.0) | 12 (1, 54) | 64 | stable | 0.3 (-0.3, 1.0) |
Hardeman County | No | 193.2 (163.8, 227.0) | 3 (1, 59) | 34 | stable | 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3) |
Overton County | No | 197.2 (168.1, 230.7) | 1 (1, 56) | 35 | stable | 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2) |
Perry County | No | 184.7 (137.1, 245.5) | 8 (1, 92) | 11 | stable | 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7) |
Sequatchie County | No | 132.4 (103.5, 168.0) | 84 (9, 95) | 15 | stable | 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9) |
Grundy County | No | 182.9 (146.7, 226.6) | 9 (1, 83) | 19 | stable | 0.4 (-0.8, 1.5) |
Meigs County | No | 168.8 (131.7, 214.4) | 17 (1, 92) | 15 | stable | 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5) |
Warren County | No | 158.8 (138.8, 181.3) | 35 (4, 86) | 47 | stable | 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0) |
Chester County | No | 169.4 (137.9, 206.6) | 15 (1, 91) | 21 | stable | 0.6 (-0.7, 2.0) |
McNairy County | No | 172.8 (147.3, 201.9) | 14 (1, 80) | 36 | stable | 0.6 (-0.2, 1.3) |
Houston County | No | 185.4 (140.1, 242.9) | 7 (1, 92) | 12 | stable | 0.8 (-0.4, 2.1) |
Crockett County | No | 189.7 (152.2, 234.4) | 5 (1, 80) | 19 | stable | 1.1 (0.0, 2.3) |
Benton County | No | 189.8 (157.8, 227.8) | 4 (1, 67) | 27 | rising | 1.2 (0.1, 2.2) |
Madison County | No | 147.9 (135.2, 161.7) | 50 (18, 84) | 105 | stable | 1.2 (-1.4, 3.8) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/29/2024 10:57 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/29/2024 10:57 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.