Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Pancreas, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Tennessee N/A *** 11.4 (11.1, 11.8) N/A 1,002 stable stable trend 0.2 (0.0, 0.3)
United States N/A *** 11.2 (11.1, 11.2) N/A 46,760 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.2, 0.3)
Warren County Rural *** 8.4 (5.3, 12.9) 72 (17, 72) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.5)
Henderson County Rural *** 8.4 (4.8, 13.9) 71 (11, 72) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.8)
Jefferson County Urban *** 8.7 (6.1, 12.2) 70 (23, 72) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.7)
Grainger County Urban *** 9.3 (5.5, 15.4) 69 (7, 72) 4
*
*
Cheatham County Urban *** 9.4 (6.0, 14.4) 68 (9, 72) 5
*
*
Hawkins County Urban *** 9.6 (6.8, 13.2) 67 (16, 72) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 2.3)
Williamson County Urban *** 9.6 (8.0, 11.4) 66 (31, 72) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 1.1)
Sullivan County Urban *** 9.8 (8.1, 11.7) 65 (27, 72) 25 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.4)
Fentress County Rural *** 10.0 (5.7, 17.3) 64 (4, 72) 3
*
*
McMinn County Rural *** 10.1 (7.2, 13.8) 63 (13, 72) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.3)
Carter County Urban *** 10.1 (7.4, 13.7) 62 (15, 72) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Unicoi County Urban *** 10.1 (5.7, 17.5) 61 (3, 72) 3
*
*
Lawrence County Rural *** 10.2 (6.9, 14.6) 60 (9, 72) 6
*
*
Bradley County Urban *** 10.2 (8.0, 12.9) 59 (18, 72) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.7)
Roane County Urban *** 10.3 (7.6, 14.0) 58 (12, 72) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.8)
Rutherford County Urban *** 10.4 (8.8, 12.2) 57 (24, 70) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Hardin County Rural *** 10.4 (6.8, 15.9) 56 (6, 72) 5
*
*
Sevier County Rural *** 10.4 (8.2, 13.2) 55 (17, 72) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.5)
Blount County Urban *** 10.5 (8.6, 12.7) 54 (20, 71) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Hamilton County Urban *** 10.6 (9.3, 12.0) 53 (26, 69) 53 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Anderson County Urban *** 10.6 (8.1, 13.8) 52 (13, 72) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.9)
Cumberland County Rural *** 10.7 (8.3, 13.9) 51 (12, 71) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 1.4)
Davidson County Urban *** 10.8 (9.7, 11.9) 50 (28, 65) 76 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
White County Rural *** 10.9 (6.7, 17.0) 49 (3, 72) 4
*
*
Lauderdale County Rural *** 11.0 (6.3, 18.0) 48 (2, 72) 3 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.9)
Knox County Urban *** 11.0 (9.8, 12.3) 47 (23, 64) 63 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 1.0)
Loudon County Urban *** 11.1 (8.2, 14.9) 46 (8, 72) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.8)
Maury County Urban *** 11.1 (8.7, 14.1) 45 (10, 71) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 2.4)
Washington County Urban *** 11.2 (9.1, 13.6) 44 (15, 70) 21 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.9)
Wilson County Urban *** 11.2 (9.1, 13.7) 43 (13, 69) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.6)
Monroe County Rural *** 11.5 (8.1, 16.0) 42 (5, 72) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.9)
Shelby County Urban *** 11.5 (10.6, 12.5) 41 (23, 58) 117 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Dickson County Urban *** 11.7 (8.2, 16.2) 40 (5, 72) 8
*
*
Obion County Rural *** 11.7 (7.7, 17.5) 39 (2, 72) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.6)
Weakley County Rural *** 11.8 (7.6, 17.6) 38 (3, 72) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 3.0)
Fayette County Urban *** 12.0 (8.5, 16.7) 37 (4, 72) 8
*
*
Madison County Urban *** 12.0 (9.4, 15.1) 36 (7, 69) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Cocke County Rural *** 12.0 (8.3, 17.1) 35 (3, 72) 7
*
*
Franklin County Rural *** 12.1 (8.5, 16.9) 34 (4, 72) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.3)
Lincoln County Rural *** 12.3 (8.1, 18.0) 33 (2, 72) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 3.3)
Campbell County Urban *** 12.5 (8.7, 17.6) 32 (2, 71) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 3.0)
Sumner County Urban *** 12.5 (10.6, 14.7) 31 (9, 63) 31 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 2.1)
Marion County Urban *** 12.7 (8.3, 18.9) 30 (1, 72) 5
*
*
Rhea County Rural *** 12.9 (8.7, 18.7) 29 (2, 72) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 3.4)
Smith County Urban *** 13.1 (7.6, 21.4) 28 (1, 72) 4
*
*
Greene County Rural *** 13.1 (10.3, 16.7) 27 (4, 67) 15 stable stable trend 14.9 (-0.6, 28.9)
Henry County Rural *** 13.2 (9.1, 18.9) 26 (2, 72) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.4)
Hamblen County Urban *** 13.2 (10.0, 17.3) 25 (3, 68) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 2.2)
Marshall County Rural *** 13.5 (8.9, 19.7) 24 (1, 72) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.7)
Giles County Rural *** 13.6 (8.9, 20.1) 23 (1, 72) 6
*
*
Benton County Rural *** 13.6 (8.2, 22.2) 22 (1, 72) 4
*
*
Robertson County Urban *** 13.6 (10.3, 17.8) 21 (2, 67) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.9)
Dyer County Rural *** 13.8 (9.4, 19.7) 20 (1, 71) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Coffee County Rural *** 13.8 (10.3, 18.2) 19 (2, 68) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.5)
Hickman County Urban *** 14.0 (8.7, 21.5) 18 (1, 72) 5
*
*
Polk County Urban *** 14.1 (8.4, 22.8) 17 (1, 72) 4
*
*
Carroll County Rural *** 14.1 (9.0, 21.1) 16 (1, 72) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.8)
Tipton County Urban *** 14.1 (10.4, 18.9) 15 (1, 68) 10
*
*
Hardeman County Rural *** 14.2 (9.1, 21.5) 14 (1, 72) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 2.0)
Montgomery County Urban *** 15.0 (12.4, 17.9) 13 (2, 48) 25 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.7, 5.0)
Putnam County Rural *** 15.1 (11.8, 19.1) 12 (1, 57) 15 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.5, 3.8)
DeKalb County Rural *** 15.1 (9.2, 23.7) 11 (1, 72) 4
*
*
Claiborne County Rural *** 15.3 (10.5, 21.7) 10 (1, 69) 7
*
*
Overton County Rural *** 15.4 (9.7, 23.5) 9 (1, 71) 5
*
*
McNairy County Rural *** 15.4 (10.4, 22.3) 8 (1, 71) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.1, 3.5)
Haywood County Rural *** 15.5 (9.3, 24.8) 7 (1, 72) 4
*
*
Gibson County Urban *** 15.8 (11.8, 21.0) 6 (1, 60) 10 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.4, 10.0)
Bedford County Rural *** 16.3 (11.9, 21.9) 5 (1, 60) 9
*
*
Jackson County Rural *** 16.6 (9.2, 28.8) 4 (1, 72) 3
*
*
Johnson County Rural *** 18.0 (11.6, 27.4) 3 (1, 68) 5
*
*
Grundy County Rural *** 18.9 (11.0, 30.8) 2 (1, 71) 4
*
*
Crockett County Urban *** 19.5 (11.6, 31.5) 1 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Bledsoe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cannon County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 3:59 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top