Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Pancreas, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
sort alphabetically by name descending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Tennessee N/A *** 11.4 (11.1, 11.8) N/A 1,002 stable stable trend 0.2 (0.0, 0.3)
United States N/A *** 11.2 (11.1, 11.2) N/A 46,760 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.2, 0.3)
Anderson County Urban *** 10.6 (8.1, 13.8) 52 (13, 72) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.9)
Bedford County Rural *** 16.3 (11.9, 21.9) 5 (1, 60) 9
*
*
Benton County Rural *** 13.6 (8.2, 22.2) 22 (1, 72) 4
*
*
Blount County Urban *** 10.5 (8.6, 12.7) 54 (20, 71) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Bradley County Urban *** 10.2 (8.0, 12.9) 59 (18, 72) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.7)
Campbell County Urban *** 12.5 (8.7, 17.6) 32 (2, 71) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 3.0)
Carroll County Rural *** 14.1 (9.0, 21.1) 16 (1, 72) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.8)
Carter County Urban *** 10.1 (7.4, 13.7) 62 (15, 72) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Cheatham County Urban *** 9.4 (6.0, 14.4) 68 (9, 72) 5
*
*
Claiborne County Rural *** 15.3 (10.5, 21.7) 10 (1, 69) 7
*
*
Cocke County Rural *** 12.0 (8.3, 17.1) 35 (3, 72) 7
*
*
Coffee County Rural *** 13.8 (10.3, 18.2) 19 (2, 68) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.5)
Crockett County Urban *** 19.5 (11.6, 31.5) 1 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Cumberland County Rural *** 10.7 (8.3, 13.9) 51 (12, 71) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 1.4)
Davidson County Urban *** 10.8 (9.7, 11.9) 50 (28, 65) 76 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
DeKalb County Rural *** 15.1 (9.2, 23.7) 11 (1, 72) 4
*
*
Dickson County Urban *** 11.7 (8.2, 16.2) 40 (5, 72) 8
*
*
Dyer County Rural *** 13.8 (9.4, 19.7) 20 (1, 71) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Fayette County Urban *** 12.0 (8.5, 16.7) 37 (4, 72) 8
*
*
Fentress County Rural *** 10.0 (5.7, 17.3) 64 (4, 72) 3
*
*
Franklin County Rural *** 12.1 (8.5, 16.9) 34 (4, 72) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.3)
Gibson County Urban *** 15.8 (11.8, 21.0) 6 (1, 60) 10 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.4, 10.0)
Giles County Rural *** 13.6 (8.9, 20.1) 23 (1, 72) 6
*
*
Grainger County Urban *** 9.3 (5.5, 15.4) 69 (7, 72) 4
*
*
Greene County Rural *** 13.1 (10.3, 16.7) 27 (4, 67) 15 stable stable trend 14.9 (-0.6, 28.9)
Grundy County Rural *** 18.9 (11.0, 30.8) 2 (1, 71) 4
*
*
Hamblen County Urban *** 13.2 (10.0, 17.3) 25 (3, 68) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 2.2)
Hamilton County Urban *** 10.6 (9.3, 12.0) 53 (26, 69) 53 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Hardeman County Rural *** 14.2 (9.1, 21.5) 14 (1, 72) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 2.0)
Hardin County Rural *** 10.4 (6.8, 15.9) 56 (6, 72) 5
*
*
Hawkins County Urban *** 9.6 (6.8, 13.2) 67 (16, 72) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 2.3)
Haywood County Rural *** 15.5 (9.3, 24.8) 7 (1, 72) 4
*
*
Henderson County Rural *** 8.4 (4.8, 13.9) 71 (11, 72) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.8)
Henry County Rural *** 13.2 (9.1, 18.9) 26 (2, 72) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.4)
Hickman County Urban *** 14.0 (8.7, 21.5) 18 (1, 72) 5
*
*
Jackson County Rural *** 16.6 (9.2, 28.8) 4 (1, 72) 3
*
*
Jefferson County Urban *** 8.7 (6.1, 12.2) 70 (23, 72) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.7)
Johnson County Rural *** 18.0 (11.6, 27.4) 3 (1, 68) 5
*
*
Knox County Urban *** 11.0 (9.8, 12.3) 47 (23, 64) 63 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 1.0)
Lauderdale County Rural *** 11.0 (6.3, 18.0) 48 (2, 72) 3 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.9)
Lawrence County Rural *** 10.2 (6.9, 14.6) 60 (9, 72) 6
*
*
Lincoln County Rural *** 12.3 (8.1, 18.0) 33 (2, 72) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 3.3)
Loudon County Urban *** 11.1 (8.2, 14.9) 46 (8, 72) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.8)
Madison County Urban *** 12.0 (9.4, 15.1) 36 (7, 69) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Marion County Urban *** 12.7 (8.3, 18.9) 30 (1, 72) 5
*
*
Marshall County Rural *** 13.5 (8.9, 19.7) 24 (1, 72) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.7)
Maury County Urban *** 11.1 (8.7, 14.1) 45 (10, 71) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 2.4)
McMinn County Rural *** 10.1 (7.2, 13.8) 63 (13, 72) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.3)
McNairy County Rural *** 15.4 (10.4, 22.3) 8 (1, 71) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.1, 3.5)
Monroe County Rural *** 11.5 (8.1, 16.0) 42 (5, 72) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.9)
Montgomery County Urban *** 15.0 (12.4, 17.9) 13 (2, 48) 25 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.7, 5.0)
Obion County Rural *** 11.7 (7.7, 17.5) 39 (2, 72) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.6)
Overton County Rural *** 15.4 (9.7, 23.5) 9 (1, 71) 5
*
*
Polk County Urban *** 14.1 (8.4, 22.8) 17 (1, 72) 4
*
*
Putnam County Rural *** 15.1 (11.8, 19.1) 12 (1, 57) 15 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.5, 3.8)
Rhea County Rural *** 12.9 (8.7, 18.7) 29 (2, 72) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 3.4)
Roane County Urban *** 10.3 (7.6, 14.0) 58 (12, 72) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.8)
Robertson County Urban *** 13.6 (10.3, 17.8) 21 (2, 67) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.9)
Rutherford County Urban *** 10.4 (8.8, 12.2) 57 (24, 70) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Sevier County Rural *** 10.4 (8.2, 13.2) 55 (17, 72) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.5)
Shelby County Urban *** 11.5 (10.6, 12.5) 41 (23, 58) 117 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Smith County Urban *** 13.1 (7.6, 21.4) 28 (1, 72) 4
*
*
Sullivan County Urban *** 9.8 (8.1, 11.7) 65 (27, 72) 25 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.4)
Sumner County Urban *** 12.5 (10.6, 14.7) 31 (9, 63) 31 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 2.1)
Tipton County Urban *** 14.1 (10.4, 18.9) 15 (1, 68) 10
*
*
Unicoi County Urban *** 10.1 (5.7, 17.5) 61 (3, 72) 3
*
*
Warren County Rural *** 8.4 (5.3, 12.9) 72 (17, 72) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.5)
Washington County Urban *** 11.2 (9.1, 13.6) 44 (15, 70) 21 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.9)
Weakley County Rural *** 11.8 (7.6, 17.6) 38 (3, 72) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 3.0)
White County Rural *** 10.9 (6.7, 17.0) 49 (3, 72) 4
*
*
Williamson County Urban *** 9.6 (8.0, 11.4) 66 (31, 72) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 1.1)
Wilson County Urban *** 11.2 (9.1, 13.7) 43 (13, 69) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.6)
Bledsoe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cannon County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/24/2025 9:54 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top