Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Death Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate†
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Tennessee *** 5.8 (5.6, 6.1) N/A 465 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
United States *** 5.3 (5.2, 5.3) N/A 20,288 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.3, -2.1)
Henderson County *** 8.7 (5.0, 14.3) 1 (1, 41) 3
*
*
Hawkins County *** 8.5 (5.9, 12.1) 2 (1, 34) 7
*
*
Loudon County *** 8.5 (5.9, 12.0) 3 (1, 34) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 1.0)
Monroe County *** 8.3 (5.3, 12.4) 4 (1, 40) 5 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.2)
Carroll County *** 8.0 (4.6, 13.2) 5 (1, 41) 3
*
*
Greene County *** 7.9 (5.5, 11.0) 6 (1, 36) 8 rising rising trend 12.0 (1.0, 24.2)
Jefferson County *** 7.5 (4.9, 11.1) 7 (1, 40) 5
*
*
Rhea County *** 7.5 (4.3, 12.4) 8 (1, 41) 3
*
*
Anderson County *** 7.4 (5.3, 10.2) 9 (1, 38) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Cocke County *** 7.4 (4.4, 11.9) 10 (1, 41) 4
*
*
Cheatham County *** 7.1 (4.0, 11.9) 11 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Coffee County *** 7.0 (4.5, 10.4) 12 (1, 41) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Knox County *** 7.0 (6.0, 8.1) 13 (4, 28) 37 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Washington County *** 6.9 (5.2, 9.0) 14 (2, 37) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Bedford County *** 6.8 (4.1, 10.8) 15 (1, 41) 4
*
*
Sullivan County *** 6.7 (5.3, 8.4) 16 (2, 36) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Henry County *** 6.7 (3.9, 11.1) 17 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Lawrence County *** 6.4 (3.8, 10.3) 18 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Hamblen County *** 6.3 (4.2, 9.3) 19 (1, 41) 6
*
*
Roane County *** 6.3 (4.0, 9.5) 20 (1, 41) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.4)
Hamilton County *** 6.2 (5.3, 7.4) 21 (6, 34) 29 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Tipton County *** 6.2 (3.7, 9.7) 22 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Maury County *** 6.2 (4.2, 8.8) 23 (2, 41) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Sevier County *** 6.1 (4.2, 8.6) 24 (2, 41) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.9)
Dickson County *** 6.1 (3.6, 9.7) 25 (1, 42) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.4)
Robertson County *** 5.8 (3.6, 9.0) 26 (2, 42) 4 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.2)
Blount County *** 5.6 (4.2, 7.4) 27 (6, 41) 10 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Campbell County *** 5.5 (3.1, 9.3) 28 (2, 42) 3 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -0.8)
Carter County *** 5.5 (3.5, 8.3) 29 (4, 42) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Bradley County *** 5.4 (3.8, 7.6) 30 (5, 41) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.2)
Rutherford County *** 5.4 (4.2, 6.9) 31 (9, 41) 14 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.4, -1.5)
Sumner County *** 5.4 (4.1, 7.0) 32 (8, 41) 11 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -0.8)
McMinn County *** 5.3 (3.2, 8.3) 33 (4, 42) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.4)
Shelby County *** 5.1 (4.5, 5.8) 34 (19, 39) 48 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.4)
Davidson County *** 5.0 (4.3, 5.9) 35 (18, 40) 33 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.8)
Gibson County *** 5.0 (2.9, 8.2) 36 (4, 42) 3
*
*
Montgomery County *** 4.8 (3.3, 6.6) 37 (10, 42) 7 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.0)
Wilson County *** 4.3 (2.9, 6.2) 38 (15, 42) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -1.0)
Putnam County *** 4.3 (2.6, 6.7) 39 (10, 42) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.7)
Williamson County *** 4.2 (3.1, 5.6) 40 (20, 42) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.4, -0.4)
Madison County *** 4.1 (2.6, 6.1) 41 (14, 42) 5 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.4, -2.2)
Cumberland County *** 2.5 (1.5, 4.5) 42 (36, 42) 3 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.8, -1.1)
Benton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bledsoe County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cannon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dyer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fentress County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Giles County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grainger County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lauderdale County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McNairy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Obion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Overton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Unicoi County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Weakley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/29/2022 2:37 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of estimates:
Benton, Bledsoe, Cannon, Chester, Claiborne, Clay, Crockett, DeKalb, Decatur, Dyer, Fayette, Fentress, Franklin, Giles, Grainger, Grundy, Hancock, Hardeman, Hardin, Haywood, Hickman, Houston, Humphreys, Jackson, Johnson, Lake, Lauderdale, Lewis, Lincoln, Macon, Marion, Marshall, McNairy, Meigs, Moore, Morgan, Obion, Overton, Perry, Pickett, Polk, Scott, Sequatchie, Smith, Stewart, Trousdale, Unicoi, Union, Van Buren, Warren, Wayne, Weakley, White

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top