Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Breast, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 20.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee No 22.1 (21.4, 22.7) 913 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
United States No 20.9 (20.8, 21.0) 41,135 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Blount County Yes 13.5 (10.2, 17.6) 12 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.4, -1.7)
Bedford County Yes 15.2 (9.4, 23.4) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.9, 0.3)
Jefferson County Yes 15.3 (10.1, 22.5) 6
*
*
Hamblen County Yes 16.4 (11.5, 22.8) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
Rhea County Yes 16.4 (9.8, 26.3) 4
*
*
Lawrence County Yes 16.6 (10.6, 25.0) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.4, 0.2)
Cumberland County Yes 16.6 (11.5, 23.7) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.1)
Coffee County Yes 17.0 (11.4, 24.5) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.0, -0.1)
Sumner County Yes 17.6 (14.1, 21.7) 18 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.4)
Greene County Yes 17.6 (12.8, 24.0) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
Campbell County Yes 18.0 (11.6, 27.1) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.3, 0.1)
Loudon County Yes 18.3 (12.8, 25.9) 8 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Madison County Yes 18.9 (14.3, 24.5) 12 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Wilson County Yes 19.1 (14.8, 24.4) 14 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
Williamson County Yes 19.2 (15.7, 23.4) 21 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -0.8)
Giles County Yes 19.4 (11.5, 31.2) 4 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.9, -0.4)
Cheatham County Yes 19.5 (12.0, 30.1) 4 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.6, -1.2)
McMinn County Yes 19.6 (13.7, 27.6) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.8)
Washington County Yes 19.6 (15.5, 24.6) 16 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.1)
Sullivan County Yes 19.7 (16.4, 23.7) 26 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -0.9)
Dyer County Yes 19.8 (12.9, 29.3) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.7)
Lauderdale County Yes 19.8 (11.2, 32.8) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 0.7)
Putnam County Yes 19.9 (14.6, 26.7) 10 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.5)
Dickson County Yes 20.2 (13.8, 28.7) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.1, 0.0)
Franklin County Yes 20.3 (13.5, 29.6) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Maury County Yes 20.4 (15.4, 26.7) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Hawkins County No 20.7 (15.1, 28.2) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.7)
Warren County No 20.8 (13.8, 30.4) 6
*
*
Marshall County No 20.9 (12.6, 32.8) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.7)
Rutherford County No 21.0 (17.6, 24.8) 28 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.1)
Knox County No 21.0 (18.6, 23.6) 59 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Carroll County No 21.1 (13.4, 32.4) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.3)
Roane County No 21.6 (15.5, 29.7) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Sevier County No 21.7 (16.7, 27.8) 14 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Weakley County No 22.0 (13.8, 33.6) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.7)
Hamilton County No 22.4 (19.7, 25.5) 53 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.4)
Carter County No 22.7 (16.9, 30.2) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.4)
Anderson County No 22.8 (17.4, 29.5) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Davidson County No 23.0 (20.8, 25.4) 83 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Marion County No 23.1 (14.5, 35.6) 5
*
*
Monroe County No 23.2 (15.9, 32.9) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.5)
Tipton County No 23.3 (16.6, 31.9) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
Montgomery County No 23.4 (18.6, 28.9) 17 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Fentress County No 23.5 (13.2, 39.9) 3
*
*
Gibson County No 23.5 (16.7, 32.4) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.1)
Bradley County No 24.6 (19.4, 30.9) 16 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Henry County No 24.6 (16.6, 35.9) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.4, 0.5)
Fayette County No 24.7 (17.0, 35.2) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.6)
Robertson County No 25.2 (18.6, 33.4) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.1)
Lincoln County No 26.1 (17.6, 37.8) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.1)
Cocke County No 26.2 (17.7, 37.6) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.5)
Hardeman County No 26.7 (16.4, 41.7) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.8, 1.5)
Humphreys County No 26.8 (15.7, 43.8) 4
*
*
Grainger County No 27.8 (16.7, 44.1) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.1)
Claiborne County No 27.9 (18.5, 40.7) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.2, 2.3)
Obion County No 28.0 (18.9, 40.4) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.3)
Benton County No 28.1 (15.7, 47.7) 3
*
*
Haywood County No 28.4 (16.6, 45.9) 4
*
*
Shelby County No 28.5 (26.5, 30.6) 154 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.0)
McNairy County No 28.9 (18.2, 43.8) 5
*
*
Scott County No 30.7 (18.8, 47.7) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.3)
Grundy County No 31.2 (17.3, 53.3) 3
*
*
Henderson County No 32.3 (21.6, 46.9) 6
*
*
White County No 32.9 (22.0, 47.9) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.0, 0.8)
Hickman County No 37.7 (24.7, 55.6) 6
*
*
Bledsoe County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cannon County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Overton County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Unicoi County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/16/2019 8:35 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top