Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas *** 146.5 (145.8, 147.1) N/A 40,467 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.8, -1.6)
United States *** 152.4 (152.3, 152.6) N/A 598,381 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Polk County *** 243.8 (225.4, 263.2) 1 (1, 14) 149 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Anderson County *** 237.2 (220.8, 254.5) 2 (1, 14) 159 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Delta County *** 235.1 (187.2, 292.9) 3 (1, 151) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.2)
Baylor County *** 234.7 (182.2, 300.8) 4 (1, 174) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Hamilton County *** 221.8 (185.7, 263.8) 5 (1, 110) 31 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9)
Stonewall County *** 220.6 (143.3, 335.9) 6 (1, 239) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Foard County *** 210.7 (119.0, 353.9) 7 (1, 242) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.6)
Trinity County *** 209.5 (184.1, 238.2) 8 (1, 95) 55 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
McCulloch County *** 208.2 (172.5, 250.1) 9 (1, 162) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Motley County *** 205.6 (120.8, 340.5) 10 (1, 242) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.5)
Donley County *** 203.5 (149.5, 273.5) 11 (1, 239) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Martin County *** 201.6 (150.5, 264.2) 12 (1, 234) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Knox County *** 199.9 (149.3, 264.4) 13 (1, 234) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Liberty County *** 198.4 (184.9, 212.6) 14 (6, 70) 171 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Coleman County *** 198.2 (166.1, 236.1) 15 (1, 177) 29 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Matagorda County *** 197.5 (179.2, 217.2) 16 (4, 98) 90 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Morris County *** 196.7 (168.3, 229.1) 17 (2, 168) 37 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Cottle County *** 195.1 (122.1, 306.3) 18 (1, 243) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Mitchell County *** 194.4 (156.1, 239.5) 19 (1, 214) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Jim Hogg County *** 193.7 (144.6, 254.3) 20 (1, 236) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
DeWitt County *** 193.1 (171.0, 217.6) 21 (4, 141) 58 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Nolan County *** 191.4 (164.3, 222.0) 22 (3, 181) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Hill County *** 191.2 (174.4, 209.4) 23 (6, 122) 101 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Kleberg County *** 188.8 (167.0, 212.5) 24 (5, 157) 56 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Lee County *** 187.8 (163.3, 215.3) 25 (4, 171) 44 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Wichita County *** 187.2 (177.4, 197.5) 26 (11, 84) 282 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.1, 2.0)
Orange County *** 186.7 (175.0, 199.1) 27 (11, 96) 194 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Coryell County *** 186.6 (171.1, 203.1) 28 (9, 128) 111 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Shelby County *** 185.5 (165.0, 208.1) 29 (6, 155) 61 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Young County *** 184.7 (161.7, 210.4) 30 (5, 175) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Hutchinson County *** 183.7 (160.8, 209.2) 31 (6, 172) 48 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Robertson County *** 183.5 (158.9, 211.1) 32 (5, 189) 43 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Coke County *** 183.3 (139.8, 241.1) 33 (1, 239) 12 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Potter County *** 183.1 (172.2, 194.5) 34 (14, 106) 217 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Montague County *** 183.0 (161.4, 207.0) 35 (6, 180) 56 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Duval County *** 182.1 (152.3, 216.6) 36 (4, 202) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Wheeler County *** 181.6 (140.6, 232.2) 37 (1, 233) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Dawson County *** 181.3 (151.4, 215.7) 38 (4, 204) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Panola County *** 181.0 (160.5, 203.8) 39 (7, 169) 59 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Wise County *** 181.0 (167.3, 195.5) 40 (12, 132) 137 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Goliad County *** 180.7 (145.9, 222.3) 41 (3, 230) 21 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Sherman County *** 180.5 (122.9, 257.0) 42 (1, 242) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.9)
Bowie County *** 180.5 (169.6, 192.0) 43 (13, 118) 211 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Lamar County *** 180.3 (166.2, 195.5) 44 (13, 138) 125 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Kaufman County *** 180.2 (169.3, 191.6) 45 (18, 119) 216 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Leon County *** 179.1 (157.1, 203.9) 46 (6, 184) 52 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Jackson County *** 178.5 (152.5, 208.0) 47 (6, 198) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Aransas County *** 177.9 (159.6, 198.2) 48 (10, 168) 79 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Fannin County *** 177.8 (161.0, 196.0) 49 (12, 161) 85 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Navarro County *** 177.2 (162.5, 193.0) 50 (15, 154) 110 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Falls County *** 177.1 (153.5, 203.7) 51 (6, 198) 42 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Sabine County *** 177.0 (150.4, 208.4) 52 (4, 204) 38 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Kimble County *** 176.8 (134.6, 230.9) 53 (1, 233) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Hemphill County *** 176.5 (123.5, 244.9) 54 (1, 240) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Johnson County *** 176.0 (167.3, 185.1) 55 (24, 121) 318 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Hunt County *** 175.8 (164.9, 187.3) 56 (22, 132) 201 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Limestone County *** 175.5 (155.0, 198.2) 57 (9, 185) 56 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Bosque County *** 175.3 (153.8, 199.6) 58 (9, 189) 54 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Jasper County *** 175.2 (158.7, 193.2) 59 (12, 169) 87 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Somervell County *** 174.8 (142.0, 213.6) 60 (2, 224) 21 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
San Patricio County *** 174.8 (161.4, 189.0) 61 (17, 148) 130 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Galveston County *** 174.8 (168.6, 181.1) 62 (33, 105) 644 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Henderson County *** 174.6 (164.0, 185.8) 63 (20, 136) 219 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Grayson County *** 174.3 (165.4, 183.5) 64 (28, 129) 301 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Gaines County *** 174.0 (145.1, 206.6) 65 (5, 219) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Ector County *** 173.7 (163.5, 184.4) 66 (23, 137) 224 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Stephens County *** 173.7 (143.0, 209.7) 67 (4, 231) 24 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Eastland County *** 173.5 (151.6, 198.1) 68 (8, 202) 49 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Cass County *** 173.0 (156.2, 191.4) 69 (14, 176) 82 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Upshur County *** 172.8 (157.3, 189.7) 70 (17, 169) 95 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Real County *** 172.3 (125.3, 235.3) 71 (1, 239) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Haskell County *** 172.1 (135.6, 217.2) 72 (3, 233) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.8)
Grimes County *** 172.0 (153.1, 192.8) 73 (11, 184) 64 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Refugio County *** 171.6 (138.2, 211.8) 74 (4, 231) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Hansford County *** 171.1 (127.3, 225.4) 75 (1, 239) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Taylor County *** 171.0 (161.6, 180.8) 76 (34, 142) 258 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Franklin County *** 170.8 (141.9, 204.5) 77 (5, 229) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Hardeman County *** 170.4 (124.6, 229.5) 78 (2, 241) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Uvalde County *** 170.3 (150.5, 192.1) 79 (11, 196) 56 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Upton County *** 169.8 (115.7, 240.7) 80 (1, 242) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.8)
Gregg County *** 169.6 (160.1, 179.6) 81 (36, 148) 244 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Bell County *** 169.3 (162.6, 176.2) 82 (42, 129) 502 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Brown County *** 169.2 (153.7, 185.9) 83 (22, 183) 92 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Hockley County *** 169.1 (147.0, 193.6) 84 (8, 211) 43 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Lynn County *** 168.8 (128.7, 218.3) 85 (3, 238) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Brooks County *** 168.7 (132.0, 213.0) 86 (3, 235) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Callahan County *** 168.0 (143.3, 196.2) 87 (10, 214) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Palo Pinto County *** 167.8 (150.1, 187.3) 88 (17, 193) 69 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Blanco County *** 167.8 (141.8, 198.2) 89 (10, 222) 32 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Runnels County *** 167.0 (139.2, 199.5) 90 (7, 229) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Clay County *** 166.8 (139.2, 199.3) 91 (9, 226) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Swisher County *** 166.8 (132.5, 208.1) 92 (5, 236) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Freestone County *** 166.6 (145.4, 190.4) 93 (13, 213) 46 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Scurry County *** 166.4 (141.8, 194.3) 94 (11, 219) 33 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Bee County *** 166.3 (146.6, 187.9) 95 (14, 209) 53 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Schleicher County *** 166.0 (111.5, 239.9) 96 (1, 242) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.7)
Floyd County *** 165.9 (127.5, 213.3) 97 (4, 238) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Edwards County *** 165.2 (105.6, 253.6) 98 (1, 243) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.1)
Wilbarger County *** 164.8 (138.4, 195.2) 99 (11, 229) 29 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Bastrop County *** 164.7 (153.0, 177.0) 100 (35, 179) 159 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Gonzales County *** 164.7 (143.0, 188.8) 101 (14, 216) 43 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Parker County *** 164.4 (155.3, 173.8) 102 (47, 165) 260 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Chambers County *** 164.3 (146.0, 184.2) 103 (20, 209) 63 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Victoria County *** 164.2 (153.4, 175.7) 104 (40, 177) 177 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Hardin County *** 164.2 (150.9, 178.4) 105 (28, 188) 117 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Childress County *** 164.0 (126.3, 209.9) 106 (4, 238) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Harrison County *** 163.9 (151.7, 176.8) 107 (36, 178) 140 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Wharton County *** 163.5 (148.1, 180.1) 108 (24, 196) 87 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Hopkins County *** 163.5 (147.5, 180.8) 109 (25, 199) 79 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Lampasas County *** 163.3 (142.9, 186.1) 110 (18, 209) 48 stable stable trend 4.1 (-12.9, 24.4)
Jones County *** 163.1 (140.6, 188.4) 111 (12, 216) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Winkler County *** 163.0 (123.7, 210.5) 112 (4, 240) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
San Augustine County *** 162.6 (133.9, 197.1) 113 (8, 229) 25 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Newton County *** 162.6 (137.7, 191.1) 114 (11, 227) 33 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Oldham County *** 162.2 (94.9, 260.8) 115 (1, 243) 4
*
*
Caldwell County *** 162.2 (146.0, 179.8) 116 (26, 202) 76 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Van Zandt County *** 162.2 (149.7, 175.6) 117 (37, 190) 130 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Burleson County *** 162.1 (141.2, 185.6) 118 (19, 216) 46 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Rusk County *** 162.0 (148.4, 176.6) 119 (36, 188) 108 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Angelina County *** 161.9 (151.1, 173.3) 120 (47, 180) 171 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Gray County *** 161.8 (141.2, 184.8) 121 (18, 215) 45 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Deaf Smith County *** 161.5 (136.2, 190.2) 122 (11, 228) 30 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Marion County *** 161.5 (134.4, 193.5) 123 (10, 230) 29 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Hale County *** 160.5 (142.3, 180.5) 124 (26, 215) 57 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Ellis County *** 160.1 (151.5, 169.0) 125 (58, 176) 277 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Red River County *** 159.8 (136.1, 187.5) 126 (15, 225) 34 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Brazoria County *** 159.6 (153.4, 165.9) 127 (76, 163) 540 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Jefferson County *** 159.5 (152.9, 166.2) 128 (79, 163) 466 falling falling trend -5.5 (-9.8, -1.1)
Briscoe County *** 159.4 (101.7, 250.5) 129 (1, 243) 5
*
*
Milam County *** 158.7 (140.7, 178.7) 130 (27, 217) 59 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Wood County *** 158.7 (145.5, 173.0) 131 (39, 199) 124 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Titus County *** 158.2 (139.8, 178.4) 132 (22, 215) 55 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Cooke County *** 158.2 (143.4, 174.3) 133 (32, 206) 87 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Camp County *** 158.2 (132.0, 188.5) 134 (9, 231) 27 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Armstrong County *** 158.1 (104.0, 239.1) 135 (1, 242) 5
*
*
Houston County *** 158.1 (139.9, 178.3) 136 (27, 215) 58 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Zavala County *** 157.8 (127.7, 193.0) 137 (9, 236) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Crane County *** 157.7 (109.3, 219.9) 138 (1, 242) 7 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
Rains County *** 157.6 (132.5, 187.0) 139 (14, 231) 31 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Madison County *** 156.8 (130.4, 187.0) 140 (13, 235) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Yoakum County *** 156.8 (120.0, 201.1) 141 (5, 240) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Lavaca County *** 155.8 (136.7, 177.2) 142 (30, 221) 52 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Nacogdoches County *** 155.5 (142.6, 169.4) 143 (54, 207) 111 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.2, -1.4)
Hood County *** 155.3 (144.0, 167.4) 144 (65, 201) 155 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Lubbock County *** 155.2 (148.9, 161.8) 145 (91, 179) 459 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Kerr County *** 155.2 (143.8, 167.5) 146 (65, 202) 154 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Cherokee County *** 154.9 (141.6, 169.2) 147 (50, 210) 104 rising rising trend 10.8 (3.4, 18.8)
Archer County *** 154.7 (125.3, 190.0) 148 (10, 237) 20 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
San Jacinto County *** 154.3 (137.6, 172.8) 149 (37, 218) 68 falling falling trend -7.2 (-10.2, -4.1)
McLennan County *** 154.0 (147.4, 160.8) 150 (101, 185) 424 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Crosby County *** 153.7 (116.6, 199.8) 151 (6, 241) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Frio County *** 153.6 (128.9, 181.5) 152 (16, 236) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Karnes County *** 153.1 (128.0, 182.0) 153 (17, 236) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Jim Wells County *** 152.8 (137.0, 169.9) 154 (47, 219) 71 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Burnet County *** 152.5 (139.6, 166.4) 155 (60, 210) 112 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
Ward County *** 152.5 (123.2, 186.7) 156 (11, 237) 19 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Llano County *** 152.2 (134.5, 172.4) 157 (40, 224) 73 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Calhoun County *** 152.2 (132.3, 174.5) 158 (23, 229) 43 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Lamb County *** 152.1 (126.4, 181.7) 159 (13, 236) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Tarrant County *** 150.7 (148.1, 153.3) 160 (132, 175) 2,799 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
Crockett County *** 149.9 (102.5, 213.1) 161 (3, 243) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Guadalupe County *** 149.7 (141.5, 158.4) 162 (96, 203) 251 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Jack County *** 149.7 (119.0, 186.6) 163 (12, 239) 17 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Mills County *** 149.6 (113.7, 196.1) 164 (10, 240) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Kinney County *** 149.4 (107.0, 205.8) 165 (4, 242) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Tom Green County *** 149.1 (139.9, 158.8) 166 (89, 206) 203 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Midland County *** 149.0 (140.1, 158.2) 167 (100, 206) 221 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
La Salle County *** 148.8 (112.2, 193.9) 168 (7, 241) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Tyler County *** 148.7 (130.5, 169.2) 169 (42, 229) 50 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Dallas County *** 148.0 (145.7, 150.4) 170 (144, 183) 3,356 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Cochran County *** 148.0 (96.9, 218.2) 171 (1, 243) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Austin County *** 147.6 (130.9, 165.9) 172 (59, 226) 61 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Howard County *** 147.4 (130.5, 165.9) 173 (55, 228) 57 stable stable trend -8.1 (-23.8, 10.8)
Throckmorton County *** 147.3 (92.9, 236.0) 174 (1, 243) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Wilson County *** 146.7 (133.0, 161.4) 175 (79, 222) 89 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Waller County *** 146.6 (131.2, 163.3) 176 (66, 226) 70 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Dallam County *** 146.2 (106.1, 195.9) 177 (6, 241) 9 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.8)
Bandera County *** 146.0 (128.5, 165.7) 178 (54, 231) 58 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Moore County *** 145.3 (121.9, 171.8) 179 (29, 238) 28 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Colorado County *** 145.3 (127.0, 165.8) 180 (53, 235) 49 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Montgomery County *** 145.2 (140.7, 149.8) 181 (142, 199) 839 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Bexar County *** 144.7 (142.2, 147.2) 182 (155, 194) 2,669 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
Andrews County *** 144.5 (118.1, 174.8) 183 (22, 239) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Erath County *** 144.2 (128.5, 161.4) 184 (68, 229) 63 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Washington County *** 143.4 (129.1, 159.1) 185 (85, 227) 80 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Maverick County *** 143.1 (128.8, 158.5) 186 (88, 229) 75 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Dickens County *** 143.0 (90.2, 220.7) 187 (2, 243) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Mason County *** 143.0 (105.4, 192.8) 188 (6, 242) 12 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Val Verde County *** 142.8 (128.6, 158.2) 189 (81, 228) 75 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Walker County *** 142.7 (130.4, 155.7) 190 (92, 223) 104 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Nueces County *** 142.4 (137.1, 147.8) 191 (149, 206) 568 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Rockwall County *** 142.3 (131.4, 153.8) 192 (104, 221) 133 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Hartley County *** 142.1 (103.8, 190.4) 193 (8, 242) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.0)
Comal County *** 141.9 (134.1, 150.0) 194 (131, 217) 264 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Harris County *** 141.6 (139.8, 143.3) 195 (166, 200) 5,550 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.9)
Smith County *** 140.6 (134.3, 147.1) 196 (150, 214) 392 rising rising trend 7.4 (3.5, 11.4)
Garza County *** 140.5 (101.2, 190.2) 197 (8, 242) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.6)
Hall County *** 140.4 (95.8, 202.5) 198 (6, 243) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.1)
Dimmit County *** 139.7 (111.0, 173.9) 199 (15, 240) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Hays County *** 139.5 (131.5, 147.9) 200 (140, 221) 245 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Randall County *** 138.7 (130.3, 147.5) 201 (142, 222) 210 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Atascosa County *** 138.6 (124.9, 153.5) 202 (101, 233) 77 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Reagan County *** 137.7 (85.7, 208.4) 203 (2, 243) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 1.0)
Medina County *** 136.8 (123.9, 150.7) 204 (117, 231) 86 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Irion County *** 136.0 (77.2, 230.4) 205 (1, 243) 3
*
*
Starr County *** 135.9 (122.6, 150.3) 206 (119, 235) 77 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.7)
Sutton County *** 135.8 (94.2, 191.4) 207 (8, 243) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Comanche County *** 135.3 (114.1, 159.9) 208 (64, 238) 31 falling falling trend -5.1 (-8.8, -1.3)
San Saba County *** 134.4 (102.2, 175.2) 209 (11, 242) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Parmer County *** 134.1 (103.9, 170.3) 210 (23, 241) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
El Paso County *** 133.7 (130.1, 137.3) 211 (184, 219) 1,067 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Castro County *** 132.7 (100.5, 172.2) 212 (17, 242) 12 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.7)
Williamson County *** 132.6 (128.0, 137.3) 213 (182, 222) 662 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Bailey County *** 132.4 (97.8, 175.5) 214 (13, 242) 10 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Concho County *** 131.2 (89.1, 189.9) 215 (10, 243) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Terry County *** 130.5 (105.3, 160.2) 216 (46, 241) 19 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Brazos County *** 130.4 (122.5, 138.8) 217 (167, 231) 207 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Gillespie County *** 129.8 (115.4, 145.9) 218 (127, 238) 71 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Webb County *** 128.7 (121.8, 135.9) 219 (183, 231) 268 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Fisher County *** 127.3 (91.7, 175.7) 220 (17, 243) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Shackelford County *** 125.9 (85.2, 182.5) 221 (10, 243) 6 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.2)
Denton County *** 125.6 (121.7, 129.7) 222 (201, 231) 842 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Willacy County *** 125.5 (105.5, 148.2) 223 (105, 241) 28 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Kendall County *** 125.3 (112.6, 139.1) 224 (164, 239) 75 falling falling trend -5.7 (-8.9, -2.5)
Lipscomb County *** 124.5 (80.9, 184.8) 225 (10, 243) 5 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.2)
Travis County *** 124.0 (120.7, 127.4) 226 (206, 231) 1,190 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.3, -2.0)
Fayette County *** 123.3 (109.0, 139.4) 227 (158, 240) 58 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Reeves County *** 122.9 (98.8, 151.2) 228 (78, 242) 18 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Live Oak County *** 122.1 (100.0, 148.3) 229 (113, 241) 22 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Collin County *** 121.2 (117.8, 124.7) 230 (210, 235) 1,012 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Cameron County *** 120.9 (116.3, 125.7) 231 (206, 236) 514 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Ochiltree County *** 118.8 (88.4, 155.8) 232 (49, 243) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Pecos County *** 117.6 (95.0, 144.0) 233 (130, 242) 19 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.8)
Brewster County *** 116.4 (92.3, 146.0) 234 (104, 242) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Collingsworth County *** 116.4 (72.9, 178.6) 235 (11, 243) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Menard County *** 116.4 (73.0, 186.6) 236 (10, 243) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.7)
Fort Bend County *** 116.1 (112.2, 120.1) 237 (216, 238) 761 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.6)
Carson County *** 114.8 (85.0, 153.3) 238 (64, 243) 10 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Hidalgo County *** 113.8 (110.3, 117.3) 239 (220, 239) 837 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Zapata County *** 109.0 (85.3, 137.2) 240 (127, 243) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Jeff Davis County *** 81.0 (49.1, 157.3) 241 (92, 243) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.4)
Hudspeth County *** 75.0 (44.6, 119.3) 242 (191, 243) 4
*
*
Presidio County *** 70.0 (49.0, 98.4) 243 (229, 243) 8 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.1, -2.1)
Borden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/25/2021 3:22 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top