Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 161.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas Yes 151.7 (151.0, 152.4) N/A 39,448 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.8, -1.6)
United States Yes 158.3 (158.2, 158.5) N/A 593,921 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.5)
Harris County Yes 149.4 (147.5, 151.2) 182 (154, 189) 5,490 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.8, -1.9)
Dallas County Yes 154.2 (151.8, 156.7) 159 (134, 175) 3,320 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Tarrant County Yes 155.1 (152.4, 157.9) 157 (128, 173) 2,679 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
Bexar County Yes 149.7 (147.1, 152.3) 180 (146, 192) 2,613 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
Travis County Yes 128.4 (124.9, 131.9) 225 (204, 230) 1,137 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
El Paso County Yes 137.5 (133.8, 141.3) 214 (182, 219) 1,061 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
Collin County Yes 123.6 (119.9, 127.4) 230 (211, 235) 923 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Hidalgo County Yes 116.4 (112.8, 120.0) 234 (222, 238) 812 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Montgomery County Yes 155.4 (150.5, 160.5) 155 (115, 185) 810 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Denton County Yes 132.8 (128.4, 137.3) 220 (191, 225) 784 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Fort Bend County Yes 123.7 (119.4, 128.1) 229 (210, 235) 715 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Galveston County No 184.3 (177.8, 191.0) 43 (24, 92) 636 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Williamson County Yes 133.3 (128.5, 138.4) 218 (189, 227) 592 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Nueces County Yes 149.7 (144.2, 155.4) 178 (133, 198) 575 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Brazoria County No 166.8 (160.3, 173.5) 114 (68, 154) 528 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Cameron County Yes 125.8 (120.9, 130.8) 228 (202, 234) 512 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Jefferson County No 170.8 (164.0, 177.8) 100 (54, 144) 488 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Bell County No 173.9 (166.8, 181.1) 86 (43, 129) 481 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Lubbock County Yes 156.6 (150.1, 163.3) 149 (107, 186) 444 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
McLennan County Yes 158.9 (152.1, 166.0) 140 (97, 180) 420 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
Smith County Yes 126.9 (120.8, 133.2) 226 (199, 234) 338 stable stable trend 4.3 (-3.1, 12.1)
Johnson County No 182.2 (173.0, 191.8) 54 (21, 113) 307 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Grayson County No 171.4 (162.4, 180.9) 95 (42, 150) 281 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Wichita County No 188.2 (178.3, 198.6) 33 (13, 100) 277 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.6, 6.4)
Webb County Yes 136.4 (129.1, 144.1) 216 (166, 228) 267 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Ellis County No 166.5 (157.4, 176.1) 116 (59, 165) 264 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Parker County No 169.1 (159.5, 179.2) 105 (48, 162) 246 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Gregg County No 175.3 (165.5, 185.5) 81 (33, 141) 246 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
Taylor County No 165.4 (156.1, 175.1) 122 (60, 172) 245 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Comal County Yes 145.9 (137.6, 154.6) 193 (132, 216) 241 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Guadalupe County Yes 153.4 (144.7, 162.5) 165 (106, 201) 239 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Ector County No 174.0 (163.7, 184.8) 84 (29, 147) 221 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Hays County Yes 140.8 (132.3, 149.7) 205 (144, 222) 221 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Midland County Yes 152.2 (143.1, 161.8) 170 (108, 206) 218 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.2)
Henderson County No 178.7 (167.8, 190.2) 67 (19, 135) 215 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Potter County No 182.8 (171.8, 194.2) 51 (14, 126) 215 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Hunt County No 195.6 (183.7, 208.0) 18 (9, 90) 211 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Randall County Yes 147.7 (138.7, 157.0) 189 (120, 214) 211 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Brazos County Yes 142.2 (133.6, 151.2) 200 (140, 222) 209 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Tom Green County Yes 155.5 (146.0, 165.4) 154 (89, 199) 209 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Bowie County No 183.2 (172.0, 194.9) 47 (17, 130) 208 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Kaufman County No 180.1 (168.8, 191.9) 63 (19, 135) 201 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Orange County No 195.8 (183.6, 208.5) 17 (7, 86) 199 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Angelina County No 171.7 (160.4, 183.6) 94 (33, 159) 176 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Victoria County No 167.2 (156.1, 178.9) 111 (42, 179) 174 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Liberty County No 200.0 (186.1, 214.7) 14 (5, 85) 164 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Bastrop County No 177.1 (164.4, 190.5) 71 (21, 152) 156 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Anderson County No 226.6 (210.5, 243.6) 5 (1, 25) 151 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.4)
Hood County Yes 156.8 (145.3, 169.1) 148 (76, 203) 148 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.5)
Kerr County Yes 150.1 (138.7, 162.4) 177 (93, 217) 144 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Polk County No 232.5 (215.0, 251.1) 3 (1, 21) 143 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Harrison County No 167.8 (155.2, 181.3) 109 (39, 184) 136 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
San Patricio County No 182.9 (169.0, 197.6) 49 (13, 138) 132 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Wise County No 180.4 (166.4, 195.3) 60 (15, 149) 129 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Lamar County No 183.4 (169.0, 198.7) 45 (12, 141) 124 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Rockwall County Yes 145.8 (134.2, 158.0) 194 (106, 222) 124 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Van Zandt County Yes 153.0 (140.6, 166.2) 167 (86, 215) 119 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Hardin County No 168.5 (154.7, 183.2) 107 (28, 191) 115 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Wood County Yes 147.0 (134.4, 160.7) 191 (100, 224) 113 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Burnet County Yes 159.6 (146.2, 174.2) 136 (53, 209) 110 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Nacogdoches County Yes 157.5 (144.2, 171.7) 146 (56, 209) 108 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.3, -1.6)
Coryell County No 182.2 (166.5, 198.9) 55 (11, 152) 103 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Navarro County No 172.4 (157.5, 188.3) 92 (24, 182) 103 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Walker County Yes 148.7 (135.8, 162.6) 184 (91, 223) 102 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Rusk County Yes 153.9 (140.4, 168.3) 161 (67, 216) 99 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Upshur County No 180.4 (164.2, 197.8) 62 (11, 160) 96 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Brown County No 183.2 (166.7, 200.9) 46 (9, 159) 96 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Cherokee County Yes 138.7 (125.9, 152.4) 211 (124, 232) 90 stable stable trend 3.0 (-7.9, 15.3)
Hill County No 172.3 (156.2, 189.8) 93 (20, 188) 89 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Matagorda County No 191.5 (173.3, 211.0) 26 (6, 137) 86 stable stable trend 5.3 (-0.3, 11.2)
Wharton County No 166.9 (151.1, 183.9) 113 (32, 206) 85 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Medina County Yes 143.8 (130.2, 158.5) 196 (94, 228) 85 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Cass County No 184.5 (166.8, 203.9) 42 (8, 159) 84 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Jasper County No 173.2 (156.6, 191.2) 89 (15, 188) 84 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Aransas County No 188.5 (169.9, 208.9) 32 (7, 145) 83 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Hopkins County No 178.2 (161.2, 196.6) 68 (12, 174) 83 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Washington County Yes 151.3 (136.4, 167.5) 172 (76, 223) 81 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Atascosa County Yes 153.7 (138.8, 169.7) 163 (62, 221) 81 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Cooke County Yes 151.7 (137.0, 167.7) 171 (58, 222) 81 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Wilson County Yes 139.6 (125.8, 154.6) 209 (115, 233) 78 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Fannin County No 166.8 (150.4, 184.7) 115 (19, 203) 78 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Kendall County Yes 140.9 (126.9, 156.3) 204 (117, 233) 77 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Caldwell County No 173.2 (155.8, 191.9) 90 (17, 190) 76 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Gillespie County Yes 141.3 (126.2, 158.2) 202 (99, 233) 75 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Maverick County Yes 143.8 (129.3, 159.4) 197 (97, 231) 73 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.4)
Starr County Yes 132.1 (118.8, 146.5) 221 (139, 236) 73 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Llano County Yes 150.4 (133.0, 170.4) 176 (54, 230) 70 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Waller County Yes 158.8 (142.1, 176.9) 142 (30, 218) 70 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2)
Val Verde County Yes 134.7 (120.8, 149.8) 217 (127, 235) 69 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Palo Pinto County No 173.5 (155.1, 193.7) 87 (16, 199) 68 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
San Jacinto County No 166.4 (148.4, 186.3) 117 (20, 212) 68 falling falling trend -8.5 (-13.2, -3.6)
Jim Wells County Yes 149.3 (133.5, 166.5) 183 (76, 226) 67 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Milam County No 185.6 (165.9, 207.4) 39 (6, 167) 67 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Chambers County No 184.6 (164.3, 206.6) 41 (7, 170) 65 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Fayette County Yes 147.9 (131.7, 166.0) 187 (69, 227) 65 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Howard County No 165.9 (147.7, 185.6) 121 (21, 208) 63 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Grimes County No 176.0 (156.4, 197.6) 77 (9, 191) 62 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Limestone County No 187.3 (166.2, 210.5) 36 (6, 170) 60 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Panola County No 194.0 (172.0, 218.2) 21 (3, 148) 59 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Hale County No 165.3 (146.8, 185.5) 123 (23, 207) 59 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Shelby County No 182.5 (162.1, 205.0) 53 (7, 183) 59 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Erath County Yes 137.8 (122.2, 155.0) 213 (117, 234) 58 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Austin County Yes 146.1 (129.1, 164.7) 192 (69, 231) 57 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Montague County No 195.6 (173.0, 220.6) 19 (3, 139) 57 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Houston County Yes 153.2 (135.2, 173.2) 166 (43, 226) 55 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
DeWitt County No 188.0 (166.0, 212.5) 34 (5, 166) 55 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Bandera County Yes 150.5 (131.9, 171.6) 175 (48, 232) 54 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Bosque County No 176.5 (155.3, 200.3) 75 (10, 200) 54 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Kleberg County No 179.4 (158.4, 202.4) 64 (8, 185) 54 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Tyler County No 167.5 (147.6, 189.6) 110 (16, 217) 54 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Leon County No 192.9 (169.5, 219.1) 24 (3, 161) 53 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Uvalde County Yes 161.1 (141.9, 182.4) 133 (25, 220) 53 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Colorado County Yes 158.9 (139.5, 180.5) 141 (23, 225) 52 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Trinity County No 204.9 (179.5, 233.6) 11 (2, 134) 52 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Lavaca County Yes 156.1 (136.8, 177.7) 151 (32, 223) 51 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Titus County Yes 151.2 (133.0, 171.2) 173 (46, 229) 51 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Eastland County No 179.1 (157.1, 203.8) 66 (8, 195) 51 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Gray County No 182.8 (160.8, 207.2) 50 (5, 189) 51 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Hutchinson County No 191.0 (167.6, 216.8) 29 (4, 167) 50 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Bee County Yes 159.0 (139.5, 180.4) 138 (28, 222) 49 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Young County No 175.7 (153.6, 200.5) 79 (10, 203) 47 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Lampasas County No 171.4 (149.7, 195.5) 97 (11, 205) 47 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Calhoun County No 168.1 (146.9, 191.8) 108 (13, 217) 46 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Freestone County No 165.0 (143.8, 188.6) 124 (15, 220) 46 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Gonzales County No 175.4 (152.8, 200.5) 80 (9, 206) 45 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Burleson County Yes 154.2 (133.6, 177.5) 160 (33, 232) 42 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Robertson County No 181.4 (156.9, 208.9) 57 (6, 198) 41 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Hockley County No 166.3 (144.1, 191.1) 119 (12, 218) 41 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Jones County No 179.3 (155.3, 206.1) 65 (7, 201) 41 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Lee County No 180.6 (156.2, 208.1) 58 (7, 205) 41 stable stable trend 6.4 (-1.9, 15.5)
Sabine County No 193.5 (165.5, 226.2) 22 (2, 175) 40 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Falls County No 173.3 (149.8, 199.7) 88 (8, 211) 40 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Morris County No 202.3 (173.6, 235.0) 13 (1, 162) 38 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Callahan County No 190.0 (163.2, 220.4) 30 (2, 191) 38 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Red River County No 177.6 (152.1, 206.8) 70 (6, 212) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Nolan County No 181.6 (155.5, 211.2) 56 (4, 202) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Jackson County No 187.5 (160.3, 218.2) 35 (4, 197) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Comanche County Yes 150.8 (128.4, 176.7) 174 (34, 234) 34 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Marion County No 191.3 (162.2, 225.2) 27 (2, 202) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Scurry County No 169.4 (144.4, 197.6) 104 (9, 221) 33 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Rains County No 183.6 (155.1, 216.7) 44 (3, 205) 33 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Moore County No 171.4 (145.5, 200.4) 96 (9, 221) 32 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Wilbarger County No 185.2 (156.7, 217.6) 40 (3, 200) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Newton County No 164.5 (138.6, 194.2) 126 (10, 228) 31 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.0, -2.8)
Deaf Smith County No 166.4 (140.6, 195.5) 118 (9, 227) 30 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Clay County No 180.4 (151.7, 213.8) 61 (4, 217) 29 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Hamilton County No 205.2 (171.3, 245.1) 10 (1, 180) 29 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.7)
Dawson County No 194.6 (164.0, 229.5) 20 (1, 189) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Willacy County Yes 126.5 (106.4, 149.4) 227 (128, 240) 28 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Camp County No 171.2 (143.3, 203.3) 99 (6, 229) 28 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Runnels County No 174.8 (146.3, 208.0) 82 (5, 223) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Coleman County No 191.1 (158.8, 229.3) 28 (1, 203) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Gaines County No 177.0 (147.8, 210.1) 72 (5, 222) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Karnes County Yes 156.9 (131.2, 186.4) 147 (17, 233) 27 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Duval County No 182.6 (152.6, 217.2) 52 (3, 214) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Blanco County Yes 148.0 (121.6, 179.2) 186 (25, 237) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Madison County Yes 158.4 (131.8, 188.9) 145 (12, 234) 25 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Lamb County Yes 152.9 (126.9, 182.9) 168 (19, 235) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Franklin County No 162.1 (133.6, 195.5) 131 (9, 232) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Andrews County No 162.8 (134.7, 194.8) 127 (11, 234) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
San Augustine County No 162.3 (133.6, 196.8) 128 (10, 232) 24 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Live Oak County Yes 133.0 (109.9, 160.3) 219 (61, 239) 24 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Stephens County No 172.7 (142.7, 207.9) 91 (4, 229) 24 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Ward County No 186.2 (153.7, 223.6) 38 (2, 217) 24 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Frio County Yes 131.7 (108.4, 158.4) 223 (82, 240) 23 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
McCulloch County No 175.8 (144.1, 213.5) 78 (4, 229) 23 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Archer County No 165.9 (135.2, 202.4) 120 (7, 234) 21 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Terry County Yes 147.3 (120.3, 178.8) 190 (19, 238) 21 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Reeves County Yes 141.2 (114.9, 171.7) 203 (35, 239) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Refugio County No 178.0 (143.8, 219.0) 69 (3, 226) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Somervell County No 168.5 (135.8, 207.4) 106 (3, 234) 19 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Zavala County No 161.7 (130.6, 197.9) 132 (5, 236) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Goliad County No 170.6 (137.0, 211.1) 102 (4, 232) 19 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Haskell County No 199.1 (159.9, 246.7) 15 (1, 211) 19 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Dimmit County Yes 149.7 (120.1, 184.5) 179 (11, 239) 18 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Mitchell County No 189.7 (152.3, 233.8) 31 (1, 220) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Delta County No 231.4 (184.1, 288.5) 4 (1, 163) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Pecos County Yes 110.5 (88.4, 136.5) 237 (155, 242) 17 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.9, -2.0)
Brewster County Yes 115.6 (91.2, 145.5) 235 (121, 241) 16 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Wheeler County No 211.0 (167.1, 264.1) 8 (1, 210) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Jack County Yes 147.8 (116.9, 184.8) 188 (14, 238) 16 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.6)
Swisher County Yes 148.7 (117.1, 187.1) 185 (12, 239) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Brooks County No 165.0 (129.3, 208.1) 125 (6, 236) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Crosby County No 198.1 (154.1, 251.3) 16 (1, 224) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Zapata County Yes 112.9 (88.2, 142.2) 236 (133, 242) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.9)
Castro County Yes 155.6 (121.2, 197.2) 153 (7, 239) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
San Saba County Yes 155.8 (119.7, 200.7) 152 (7, 239) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Childress County No 162.1 (124.5, 207.9) 130 (3, 238) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Floyd County Yes 161.1 (123.4, 207.6) 134 (3, 239) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Baylor County No 204.4 (154.9, 267.7) 12 (1, 231) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Carson County Yes 152.7 (116.9, 197.2) 169 (7, 239) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Donley County No 239.7 (181.0, 314.0) 2 (1, 190) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
Kimble County Yes 159.4 (120.2, 210.3) 137 (4, 238) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Ochiltree County Yes 140.1 (107.2, 179.7) 206 (21, 241) 13 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Parmer County Yes 120.4 (91.8, 155.1) 231 (72, 242) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Winkler County No 174.0 (132.5, 224.0) 85 (2, 236) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.7)
Yoakum County Yes 159.0 (120.7, 205.1) 139 (6, 239) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Knox County No 208.4 (156.8, 273.5) 9 (1, 223) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Coke County No 176.2 (132.8, 234.5) 76 (1, 238) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Fisher County Yes 154.4 (116.1, 204.8) 158 (6, 240) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Mason County Yes 137.1 (101.7, 184.6) 215 (12, 241) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
Real County No 177.0 (130.7, 239.1) 73 (1, 236) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Hardeman County No 182.9 (135.8, 243.2) 48 (1, 236) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Kinney County No 180.5 (132.5, 242.8) 59 (1, 238) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Garza County No 174.6 (130.3, 229.3) 83 (1, 238) 11 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.5)
Bailey County Yes 139.1 (103.5, 183.2) 210 (12, 241) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Jim Hogg County No 171.3 (126.6, 227.0) 98 (2, 239) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Lynn County Yes 142.0 (105.3, 188.1) 201 (7, 241) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Mills County Yes 116.4 (84.5, 159.0) 233 (49, 242) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.5)
Hansford County Yes 158.7 (116.9, 211.0) 144 (3, 240) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Concho County No 176.7 (128.0, 240.2) 74 (1, 238) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Dallam County Yes 149.6 (107.6, 201.7) 181 (6, 240) 9 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Hall County No 166.9 (118.4, 232.2) 112 (1, 240) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Hartley County Yes 131.7 (94.7, 178.9) 222 (16, 242) 8 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.2, -0.1)
La Salle County Yes 107.2 (76.5, 146.3) 238 (83, 242) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.7)
Martin County Yes 153.5 (108.6, 210.4) 164 (3, 241) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.6)
Presidio County Yes 70.8 (49.4, 99.4) 241 (231, 242) 8 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.8, -2.5)
Crane County No 170.6 (119.9, 235.0) 101 (1, 240) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
Shackelford County Yes 156.2 (109.8, 218.3) 150 (3, 241) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.8)
Schleicher County No 193.0 (133.6, 271.2) 23 (1, 238) 7 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 3.3)
Hemphill County No 162.2 (112.3, 227.0) 129 (1, 241) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.6)
Sutton County Yes 139.9 (96.3, 197.8) 208 (4, 242) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.1)
Sherman County No 192.2 (131.5, 272.2) 25 (1, 239) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.3)
Cottle County No 249.5 (167.7, 368.1) 1 (1, 232) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.2)
Crockett County Yes 138.5 (92.8, 199.7) 212 (5, 242) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.1)
Upton County Yes 153.8 (102.9, 221.3) 162 (2, 241) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.7)
Edwards County No 170.3 (110.9, 257.9) 103 (1, 241) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.5)
Armstrong County No 187.2 (121.6, 281.2) 37 (1, 240) 6
*
*
Collingsworth County Yes 143.5 (94.8, 210.4) 198 (3, 242) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Cochran County Yes 143.3 (93.3, 212.4) 199 (2, 242) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.3)
Menard County Yes 131.0 (83.0, 205.6) 224 (4, 242) 5 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.2)
Jeff Davis County Yes 98.5 (62.7, 168.9) 240 (39, 242) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.9)
Motley County No 212.9 (130.3, 344.9) 7 (1, 241) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.8)
Briscoe County Yes 160.0 (101.0, 252.9) 135 (1, 242) 5
*
*
Reagan County Yes 145.7 (91.6, 218.8) 195 (1, 242) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.7)
Dickens County Yes 119.5 (74.4, 188.1) 232 (13, 242) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.6)
Lipscomb County Yes 102.7 (63.6, 158.2) 239 (25, 242) 4 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.5, -1.3)
Throckmorton County Yes 158.8 (96.6, 255.5) 143 (1, 242) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.5)
Foard County No 213.7 (125.0, 350.1) 6 (1, 241) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.1, 2.7)
Stonewall County Yes 155.2 (94.5, 253.0) 156 (1, 242) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.5)
Hudspeth County Yes 70.6 (39.7, 117.3) 242 (200, 242) 3
*
*
Irion County Yes 140.0 (78.8, 237.5) 207 (1, 242) 3
*
*
Borden County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/07/2020 6:15 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top